Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рабочий коммунист

Channel

Рабочий коммунист

@rabochiykommunist1917

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

347subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002430305833
TypeChannel
Username@rabochiykommunist1917
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rabochiykommunist1917

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

268347307.57 August 2026 — 268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 268 subscribers15 August 2026 — 298 subscribers22 August 2026 — 315 subscribers30 August 2026 — 330 subscribers9 September 2026 — 336 subscribers16 September 2026 — 347 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 256–359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:16347+11
9 Sept 2026, 10:21336+6
30 Aug 2026, 09:25330+15
22 Aug 2026, 13:46315+17
15 Aug 2026, 19:03298+30
7 Aug 2026, 23:12268no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:17268first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17672.4%
💋249.88%
😁124.94%
🔥114.53%
❤83.29%
💊41.65%
🙈20.823%
🤬20.823%
⚡10.412%
😭10.412%
😱10.412%
🥴10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC161 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Рабочий коммунист✭☭

👍10🔥4💊3❤2💋1🥴1

27 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC115 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alliance_of_red_front_fightersPhoto

Энвер и Неджмие Ходжа. Фото было колоризировано нами. #окно_из_нынешнего_в_прошлое@alliance_of_red_front_fighters

👍11💋2🙈1

18 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC481 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выдержки из позорной речи вождя немецкой социал-демократии, Отто Вельса, от 23 марта 1933 года Доподлинно известно, что немецкая социал-демократия, будучи социальной опорой буржуазии в период Веймарской Республики, шла по оппортунистическому пути социального мира с буржуазией и союза с ней же. На этом пути она шла на тягчайшие преступления против рабочего класса, на расстрелы рабочих демонстраций, на подавление Про…

👍11💋1

12 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Венесуэльские ревизионисты были замечены с израильскими военными после капитуляции перед шантажом американских империалистов. Рабочий коммунист✭☭

👍5🤬1😱1

3 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC324 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рабочий коммунист✭☭

😁11👍3💋1🔥1😭1

28 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antirevision_1917File

File, posted without a caption

👍8💋1

28 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC227 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antirevision_1917Photo

«Об истории китайского ревизионизма» 🇨🇳 Издательством марксистско-ленинской литературы «8 Ноября» был выпущен в свет сборник из 3-х документов о китайском ревизионизме и «маоцзэдуниъидеях». Перевод на русский двух документов был осуществлён телеграм-каналом «Рабочий коммунист». Дизайн и вёрстка выполнены пролетарским медиа «Красная Молния». В сборник входят: — И. В. Ковалёв, «Записка на имя И. В. Сталина о некоторы…

👍7❤1💋1🔥1🤬1🙈1

21 Jun 2026, 08:12 UTC247 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alliance_of_red_front_fighters

Класс «в себе» и класс «для себя». Маркс и Энгельс показали, что пролетариат в своём развитии из класса «в себе» превращается в класс «для себя». Понятия «класс в себе» и «класс для себя» отражают различные ступени зрелости пролетариата, ступени роста его самосознания как самостоятельной политической силы. Потребовался целый исторический этап, чтобы пролетариат осознал свои интересы как непримиримо противоположные к…

👍10💋3

13 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC649 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Об интервью Пол Пота для делегации югославских журналистов от 17 марта 1978 года Интервью представляет из себя крайне интересный экземпляр того, каким образом Пол Пот подразумевал развитие Камбоджи, а также того, как он относился к такому ревизионистскому государству-агенту американского империализма, как Югославия. Нынче популярно мнение о том, будто бы Пол Пот получал финансирование и помощь от Китая, США, Югослав…

👍7💋2⚡1💊1

12 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC219 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lenpravda1917Photo

12 июня — День России: Праздник или поражение народа? 12 июня отмечается в России как День России, праздник, который стал символом независимости страны и стремлений к суверенитету. В 1990 году в этот день была принята Декларация о государственном суверенитете РСФСР. Данная декларация подписанная Борисом Ельцином провозглашала приоритет конституции РСФСР над конституцией СССР, что стало одним из первых шагов на пути …

👍10💋1

9 Jun 2026, 18:40 UTC368 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Граффити КПГ/МЛ на Берлинской стене, гласящее: «При Сталине здесь не было никакой стены!» Рабочий коммунист✭☭

👍17🔥5💋1

4 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC899 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Продолжение к посту: https://t.me/rabochiykommunist1917/558 Конкретные строчки, где Троцкий стоит за единый фронт в Германии и против единого фронта в Испании: 1. Немецкая катастрофа https://www.marxists.org/russkij/trotsky/works/trotm354.html В ней Троцкий пишет: «Никакая политика коммунистической партии не могла бы, разумеется, превратить социал-демократию в партию революции. Но не в этом и состояла цель (Выде…

👍8💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rabochiykommunist1917. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рабочий коммунист” (@rabochiykommunist1917), 347 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rabochiykommunist1917.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.