🤡ФИФАргентина vs Негрейра😭 Матч века 🔥 Негрейра vs Инфантино — коррупционер vs коррупционер 😌
❤12💯4❤🔥2😁1

Channel
@rabcelona
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003779690674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rabcelona |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rabcelona |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 143 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 145 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 149 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 154 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 157 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 158 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,028 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269363739009784078 | 145 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5883990107576343242 | 101 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5249239777118558050 | 96 | 9.34% | |
| ❤ | 92 | 8.95% | |
| custom 5411232319887410993 | 82 | 7.98% | |
| custom 5233683302493228089 | 79 | 7.68% | |
| 🤡 | 58 | 5.64% | |
| custom 5269668694572702965 | 50 | 4.86% | |
| custom 5881957467058870993 | 48 | 4.67% | |
| custom 5897842884639463579 | 48 | 4.67% | |
| custom 5269604038135029388 | 47 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5328174528625419671 | 32 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5269269666341101006 | 27 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5269763042119293181 | 25 | 2.43% | |
| custom 5344054040625972953 | 17 | 1.65% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 1.46% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 0.973% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 0.875% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 0.875% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 0.778% | |
| 9 further kinds | 30 | 2.92% |
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,028 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤡ФИФАргентина vs Негрейра😭 Матч века 🔥 Негрейра vs Инфантино — коррупционер vs коррупционер 😌
❤12💯4❤🔥2😁1
🅰️АССИСТЫ НА ЧМ🏆 🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈 Гейдри + Хави + Иньеста: 2 ассиста 🅰️ 🇲🇦 Браим Диас: 4 ассиста 🅰️ Ставь «❤️», если баночник Реала > легенды ВАРсы
❤31💯3👍2🤡1
🏴 Беллингем: ⚽️ 4+1 🅰️ на ЧМ 🏳️🌈 Гейдри: 🏳️🌈 Ставь «❤️», если Беллингем трахер Очколонии 🏳️🌈
❤33👍2🔥1🤡1
Роналду против принцессы ФИФА 🏳️🌈
custom 532817452862541967132🤡2🤯2🔥1
🏳️🌈 Карьеру Песси можно подытожить так: • Гормоны (незаконны в любом виде спорта) • Скандал на Стэмфорд Бридж • 4 незаслуженных Золотых мяча • Копа Америка раз в 2 года (пока не выиграл) • Отбеливание прессы • Инфантино
custom 526976304211929318125custom 53799361816916507724
😭 Песси сегодня, когда не забил легчайший пенальти, подаренный его папой Инфантино:
custom 526936373900978407831❤3👍1
🏳️🌈 Давайте вспомним про величайшую легенду Очколонии, которая и принесла им тот самый "требл" 🏳️🌈
custom 526926966634110100627🔥2❤1
🇪🇦🏳️🌈 Финалы выигранные друг против друга 😭Месси: 1 финал 🏆 😎Роналду: 4 финала 🏆🏆🏆🏆 Ставь «🤩», если Роналду — отец Пессидога 🏳️🌈
custom 589784288463946357948
🤩 Винисиус сравнялся со Сроналдиньо по голам на ЧМ, сыграв в 2 раза меньше матчей 🤣 Ставь «🏳️🌈», если Сроналдиньо переоценён
custom 526966869457270296548🤡11custom 52696040381350293884🔥2
🏳️🌈 Кто-то ещё сомневается в том, что Бомжпорта - тупой даун? 😂
custom 526936373900978407836custom 52696040381350293887👍3🤣1
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🇵🇹 Бернарду Силва - новый владелец Рычагселоны 🏳️🌈 😂 Реал даже тут обоссал Варсу
custom 526936373900978407841custom 52696040381350293887🤡5🔥3🤣3💊1🖕1
🏳️🌈 Вы говорите, что Песси - чемпион мира. 🇦🇷 Но за всю историю ВАРгентина систематически не стыдясь покупала все свои кубки 😭 Сын Инфантино - это просто участник системы. Он выиграл Чемпионат мира за счёт 5-ти пенальти, которые ему подарила система ФИФА. 🏳️🌈 Также Песси преуспел украсть у Хамеса Родригеса MVP Чемпионата мира в 2014-м. 🏳️🌈 Система - это главная причина того, почему Португалия и Криштиану до си…
custom 526960403813502938826🖕7custom 52693637390097840785❤3🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rabcelona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНТИ БАБСЕЛОНА” (@rabcelona), 143 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rabcelona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.