Channel
@r_antiwork
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
510subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657331448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r_antiwork |
| Created | 29 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r_antiwork |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 510 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 512 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 512 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 446 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Bernie Sanders Introduces Bill to Guarantee Paid Vacation for U.S. Workers https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-introduces-bill-to-guarantee-paid-vacation-for-u-s-workers/ https://redd.it/1vhap16 @r_antiwork
A heading for this meme https://redd.it/1vh82i8 @r_antiwork
Where is this all going? I hate to be so negative, but if the entire population doesn’t protest now, this is only going to get worse. We are being stripped away of things and they are being sold right back to us, we don’t sue anyone anymore, its gotten so out of hand that the companies are using legal fines as a way to get away with illegal data collection and violating rights. AI is already on the way to take your…
Manhattan UPS workers sleep in cafeteria, wander streets overnight under split-shift regime https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/08/06/nymh-a06.html https://redd.it/1vh4nwy @r_antiwork
manager asked me to make it look nice on a friday. i did it in eleven minutes. eleven minutes is now the expectation. i'm in ops. the deck was for a monday morning standup. she sent it at 4:52pm with a text - can you make this look nice before you go x. So i did it. dumped it in gamma, rewrote the headings myself because the generated ones are embarrassing, sent it back at 5:03. She replied oh amazing, that was quic…
This guy is such a scammer https://redd.it/1vh3gzh @r_antiwork
US Labour Participation Crisis: 720,000 Workers Exit Job Market as Tech Layoffs Fuel Dropout Trend https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/us-labour-market-crisis-tech-layoffs-1812799 https://redd.it/1vh200r @r_antiwork
The management here - I dont know how they will last 5+ years yet alone another 6months. https://redd.it/1vgi9k1 @r_antiwork
High Effort, No Reward: From Delhi to Seoul, Youth Have Had Enough https://www.truthdig.com/articles/high-effort-no-reward-from-delhi-to-seoul-youth-have-had-enough/ https://redd.it/1vgoq5j @r_antiwork
Piñata Economics remaster https://redd.it/1vgoyu7 @r_antiwork
So my boss is Super MAGA, and I am not sure what to do with my life. Hai Guyz, Been working for a small accounting firm. I've worked trades but it never worked out. Most of our clients are landlords and trust fund babies. My boss one time said ,"black people are too dumb to vote". He also accused others of having Trump Derangement syndrome. He seemed like a nice guy I they surface and even gave me a job in the fie…
Admin admitted she has no work. Dumb move? Union job, great pay, lots of PTO. Mandatory 2 days in office. Our secretary told the VP she has nothing to do on those days and offered to be "available if tasks come up" as a pitch for full WFH. VP said no. Rules are rules. But she said it out loud. She framed it as flexibility… isee it as admitting she's redundant. She should have kept up appearances, stretched her few…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @r_antiwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 696,981 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Antiwork” (@r_antiwork), 510 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_antiwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.