Times like this make me miss when we had a clinical striker like Robbie Keane. He was scoring goals for fun and he was a very strong footballer. Now we are stuck with Richarlison and Solanke… I wish we can make Keane 20 years younger instead! https://redd.it/1vm7cmc @r_Tottenham

Channel
r/Tottenham Hotspurs
@r_Tottenham
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001517035291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r_Tottenham |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r_Tottenham |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 12 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 11 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 10 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.9%
- avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
WTF? "Djed Spence nears Tottenham exit with Inter in talks over £25.6m move" — what to make of this possibility, at that price? I mean, RDZ did say he only wants players who want to be with the club, so... https://redd.it/1vlsrbq @r_Tottenham
folarin balogun https://redd.it/1vlq2nj @r_Tottenham
Ticket prices for Charlton at home /r/coys/comments/1vlnpid/ticket_prices_for_charlton_at_home/ https://redd.it/1vlo977 @r_Tottenham
I can watch this over and over again https://redd.it/1vldu6d @r_Tottenham
スタジアムにいるアジア人ファン /r/coys/comments/1vc69rp/asian_fans_at_stadium/ https://redd.it/1vkxtma @r_Tottenham
Why are people pretending Savinho is better than Tel? https://redd.it/1vl0oeb @r_Tottenham
Micky!! Probably one of the best signings is him signing a new contract. https://redd.it/1vkvygm @r_Tottenham
[fabrizioromano] 🚨Cuti Romero is now one step away from Atletico Madrid. Tottenham have received a new offer, set to close at around €40 million. https://redd.it/1vktlmn @r_Tottenham
Spurs everytime Inter try and open talks for one of our players https://redd.it/1vkwigd @r_Tottenham
Plan of Attack: Spurs Transfer Targets https://thinkspurs.substack.com/p/plan-of-attack-spurs-transfer-targets?r=8ugi9e&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true https://redd.it/1vkpego @r_Tottenham
Who are these bomba signings It's been like two weeks and I'm dying of anticipation. I know Savinho is one of them, but who could the other be? Osihmen, Vlahovic??? https://redd.it/1vkmwp5 @r_Tottenham
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @r_Tottenham. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“r/Tottenham Hotspurs” (@r_Tottenham), 12 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r_Tottenham.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.