—

Channel
شغمُوم .
@r8il8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,205subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001366327535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @r8il8 |
| Description | يالله إنك لا تخيّب هقوتي . @lE8ll |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/r8il8 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 27,205 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 27,205 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 217
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
أنا ما عمري جيت كلي إلا معك .
قهوني من خاثر حكاك يالذربَ اللعوب والله إن راسي على طعم نجواك يّخرم .
—
وأنا على شوفتك مُغرم وملهوف .
ودي بشوفك عسى حظي يبشرني بالموعد اللي من أعماقي تحريته .
—
أنا على نور وجهك ليلتي قمرا .
لا غاب نور القمر في عتمة الليل ينشاف نور البدر في وجه خلي .
—
عادك أنت العيد واغلا العايدين .
عيدي معك حب و غرام ومواصيل وعيدي مع باقي المخاليق واجب .
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @r8il8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@nunnp · 2,705#1
@alw_7 · 808#2
@sh7rea · 895#3
@x3zl_h · 4,307#4
@baatt_24 · 279#5
@Meshtaq_reashy · 660#6
@WAL1D · 423#7
@as_t_02 · 571#8
@i_o8e · 1,366#9
@VIP_I9_2 · 2,336#10
@U_W_55 · 1,987#11
@frensh_eeu · 3,677#12
@aah332 · 95 (as read 29 September 2026)#13
@P_503 · 1,272#14
@a3zaf9 · 968#15
@Qhttt_505 · 3,347 (as read 29 September 2026)#16
@twilightA · 1,113#17
@r2illp · 6,660#18
@i1ncm · 4,763#19
@t9iiG · 882#20
@Tloooss · 1,192#21
@mohx71 · 789#22
@Aajab25 · 6,961#23
@tweenties · 428#24
@NBII9 · 101#25
@qwetris · 3,605#26
@StudentsDM · 3,502#27
@RII_Fq · 3,727#28
@lixrul · 61#29
@Nufmbr · 847#30
@Gaaidaa · 690#31
@a_ktpasat · 660#32
@io_11y · 3,341#33
@AS505 · 5,605#34
@seyuoson · 2,303#35
@sf_59 · 3,884#36
@llol0lo · 1,193#37
@Aljazeei · 400#38
@paron77 · 4,306#39
@asdddag · 41#40
@ra7anerd · 4,690#41
@ScientificChannel_Nutrition1 · 1,274#42
@Quoranie · 699#43
@nourralhuda21102000 · 2,469#44
@thekksz · 2,630#45
@Baaaaaaaaf · 2,367#46
@ghidandark · 385#47
@douaa433 · 278#48
@llci4 · 1,399 (as read 29 September 2026)#49
@ymmk_drobee · 3,201#50
@indexmedicine7 · 7,235#51
@AhsaJobs · 10,368#52
@Waraqah24 · 67 (as read 29 September 2026)#53
@valentino_by_k · 219#54
@EJJJJ9 · 609#55
@politicalTA · 3,345 (as read 29 September 2026)#56
@arabbttck · 4,722#57
@ReferencesofNutrition · 4,948#58
@manai711 · 23#59
@QtrPn · 2,126#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yourheart3333 · 20,044
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شغمُوم .” (@r8il8), 27,205 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r8il8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.