Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝕽𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 (( 𝖁𝐀𝐍𝐄.

Channel

𝕽𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 (( 𝖁𝐀𝐍𝐄.

@r0m1ldaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003197429629
TypeChannel
Username@r0m1ldaa
Created1 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/r0m1ldaa

Growth

2211 Aug 2026, 20:01 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:12 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 20:0111 Aug 2026, 22:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:1222no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:0122first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 1 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊1317.8%
🔥1216.4%
🙏1115.1%
💘811.0%
68.22%
68.22%
❤‍🔥68.22%
💋68.22%
🍓45.48%
🆒11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 7 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @r0m1ldaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 November 2025 to 28 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Mar 2026, 14:44 UTC228 viewsread 11 August 2026

я теперь типа снова холостяк

Signed

12 Mar 2026, 18:47 UTC289 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пролистывая ветхие страницы её дневника можно найти страницу, которая совсем не похожа на остальные. Изначально, она была вырвана, после скомкана, а весь текст перечеркнут. Но, по-прежнему оставался читаемым. По первым словам было легко догадаться, что запись была о любви. Признание? Фразы были раскиданы по странице и на обратной стороне, но собрать в один текст было достаточно просто. Запись была о чувствах, которые

💋5💘542🍓2🙏2🔥1🕊1

Signed

12 Mar 2026, 18:47 UTC180 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

« 𝐖𝐓𝐅, 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓¡? » 🤍 𝐃𝐄𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄. 🤍 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🚫 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🚫 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 #𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐒 #𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐄 #𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒

🕊2❤‍🔥1🔥1🙏1

Signed

24 Jan 2026, 18:21 UTC389 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

𝟏. 𝐅𝐈𝐄𝐑𝐓𝐄 — Гордыня. Гордыня – вера в свою исключительность и уникальность. Главная причина её проявления – внутренний страх. Это своеобразная защита личности от попыток со стороны окружающих унизить его достоинство. «С самого детства ей все твердили, что она не похожа на всех детей и ведет себя очень странно. Поступив в Хогвартс, Ромильда осталась при мнении, что ей нравится быть не такой, как все остальные студент

🔥32🙏21🍓1💘1🕊1🆒1

Signed

24 Jan 2026, 18:21 UTC278 views6 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

« 𝐖𝐓𝐅, 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓¡? » ➿ 𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐋𝐘 𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐒. ➿ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🚫 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🚫 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎𝐒 | #𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐒 | #𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍𝐒 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆: Данный пост является исключительно моей выдумкой. Если ваше мнение расходится с моим – это нормально. Приятного прочтения!

🔥2🕊2🙏2

Signed

15 Jan 2026, 18:05 UTC283 views12 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

𝕮𝐎𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐂𝐓 𝕾𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐓. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Безусловно всем, даже самому наивному и глупому человеку нужны друзья. Может быть, люди, которые думают так же, как и ты сам? 🌟 𝕮𝐎𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝕱𝐎𝐑 𝕰𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐘. 𝟎𝟏. Я – единственная Ромильда Вэйн в вашем коннекте, соответственно Вы – единственный каноннный персонаж у меня. 𝟎𝟐. Взаимный актив на дневниках друг друга, а именно: реакции, комментарии, репосты и прочее. 𝟎𝟑. Оригинальные персон

🕊621💘1🔥1🙏1

Signed

13 Jan 2026, 16:50 UTC222 views16 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Ромильда Вэйн — девушка, которую принято относить к кругу наивных людей. Каждый взгляд, невзначай брошенный в её сторону – очередной повод для переживаний, каждая улыбка - маска, за которой обычно прячется всё. Вэйн всегда верила во что-то более мучительное, чем любовь или ненависть. Она жила совсем в другом мире, не таком прогнившем, как ей казалось. Н

❤‍🔥5🔥4🙏3🍓1💋1💘1🕊1

Signed

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @r0m1ldaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 467,294 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕽𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐀 (( 𝖁𝐀𝐍𝐄.” (@r0m1ldaa), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/r0m1ldaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.