Channel
@qynbd666888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
295subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002868384861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qynbd666888 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 16 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qynbd666888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 295 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 295 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,118 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
19 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【评级分数】：9分 【时间】：8月7号 【位置】：君安店 【老师】：玲玲 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：活着 【环境】：优美 【满意程度】：9分 【服务详情】： 正好一年，我重新来到了情艺家 ，去年也是八月份，我写了我在情艺的第一份出击报告，https://t.me/qynbd666888/16 ， 怀念之感迸发而出，不扯蛋了，重新关注是在六号 正好更新了一个玲玲，她去年就也在情艺家，正是因为我想做时间长的会更主动玩的更开心一点，我便萌生出准备选她的想法一一可爱的长相，带着自然肉感的身材，看着就觉得格外舒服。提前问过客服，对方夸她服务好、性格也好，我便约了她。等待的时候心里又紧张又期待，手心都悄悄冒了汗。一眼就看到穿可爱小裙子的她，和之前接触过的风格完全不同，甜得让人眼前一亮。进门时她轻声问要不要换拖鞋，礼貌又周到，倒让我更不好意思了。我本就偏内向被动，为了缓解紧张，赶紧点了两杯果茶。她看到店里的猫眼睛一亮，她递过猫条…
【时间】：8.6 【位置】：西安路 【妹子】：惠子 【学生】：嘿哈 【价格】：1299 【环境】：他家很有氛围感而且很火爆 【热情程度】：8-9分 【个人卫生】：还是可以的 【流程小文】： 碰巧假期正好看到在大连群发的广告了，就去跑到西安路出击了，我先vv和结束后，出来看到坐在沙发上的惠子穿了个超短裤那一双大长腿很是诱人，买的火车票还有两个小时时间，就又点了惠子一个钟。 妹子说话很温柔，进屋后就随便选了个剧看，毕竟看剧不是主要目的，然后就一起躺下了，妹子主动的依偎在我怀里，相互聊了几句，就开始进入正题了，亲的时候感觉妹子很积极主动的在回应，但是毕竟刚接触这行，吻技还是有待提高，亲了一会就开始把玩妹子的大长腿，真是又细又长，皮肤也很好摸着很滑很嫩，用网上的梗说就是这腿不蹬三轮可惜了，妹子胸中规中矩感觉有 c或者 c+吧，这个判断的不太准，粉粉嫩嫩的，和她这个身材也挺搭很和谐，和惠子抱在一起的时候，妹子抱的很用力😂，整个过程中妹子配…
【时间】：7.30 【位置】：西安路店 【妹子】：悦悦 【学生】：zippy 【价格】：1299 【环境】：私密性高 【热情程度】：9 【综合评分】：9 【详细体验感受】：今天突然想试试女仆馆挑选了几家这个性价比还算不错到了以后会有人接待，今天我去时，选了一个妹妹，叫悦悦 穿着jk看着还不错就选她了 总体来说还不错 有种网恋 第一次见面的感觉随便摸随便亲 课表上有的都比有，大家关心的还是价格或者性价比的问题，这个我只能说仁者见仁 智者见智了，这个重在情绪价值，没有风尘气，像女朋友一样，年龄小颜值高，缺点就是没有什么9598的 但是在目前大连这个环境下 有个释放的门店已经很难得了 也不会有会所的服务，其实想像成许久未见的女友就行，陪你聊天陪你玩陪你闹 【是否推荐】：值得追求情绪价值的一试
❤1
【时间】：7.21 【位置】：西安路 【妹子】：包子 【学生】：keepp 【价格】：1299 【环境】：中规中矩吧 【热情程度】：8-9分 【个人卫生】：见面有淡淡的清香洗完澡过来的 【流程小文】：上次在大连群里看见情艺是去年的时候了，看见情艺重新做女仆店了，我火速联系客服要了出勤表和课表，决定看看情艺现在的质量，我刷到了包子，去找客服要了几张其他照片看一下是不是假货，确认没有问题也是直接下单。 包子到了以后经过我的身边的时候可以闻到她身上的淡淡的香味，不是香水的味道，像是自然的体香，问了以后她跟我说是洗完澡过来的，好评加分。 我个人比较喜欢舌吻亲嘴，到了房间以后把灯关掉就开始对妹妹发起攻势，刚刚开始还有点反抗，在我的手法和嘴法攻势下，最终还是选择了配合哈哈哈哈。后来实在是憋的有点难受，也是让她压在我身上给我打了出来🤤，后面到时间了也是很不舍得她，走的时候我送她到了楼下，给我我一个离别的拥抱结束了这次的相遇。 总结一下包子可能…
【评级分数】：10 【时间】：7月19号 【位置】：君安店 【老师】：vv 【套餐】：899 【学生】：逆战 【环境】：算干净的，垃圾桶里面没有垃圾 【满意程度】：9分 【服务详情】：今天想着闲来无事去出击一下，就刷到了情艺，客服问我喜欢哪个，第一眼我就看到了vv模卡是我喜欢的类型，来到情艺君安店后，妹妹开门带我上房间，第一次见面感觉是高冷的御姐，但经过时间检验，是个有点活泼的女孩子，很主动也很热情，因为我是i人有点紧张，她会主动缓解我的紧张，也会主动递水给我，跟她互动也是很舒服，很自在，服务当中也不会太急躁，调情手法让我很酥麻，让人欲罢不能，最喜欢的就是vv的摇摇车啦哈哈哈哈，摇在我心里了，该有的vv一样都不会落下，一套行云流水过后，时间过得很快就要走了，有点舍不得，vv真的是一个很有趣灵魂的妹妹，下次还会反的🤪
【时间】：2026-07-18 【老师】: 小爱 【留名】：kmiyimi 【人照】：10 【颜值】：10 【身材】：10 【服务】：10 【态度】：10 【环境】：10 【综合】：10 【过程】：体验太棒了，小爱太可爱了😘，声音软软的叫哥哥，长相非常漂亮颜值相当高，皮肤虽然没有特别白但很光滑，身材更是爆炸，小小的身高居然有D，妥妥的细枝接硕果，屁股也翘翘的，很难相信这些都出在一个人身上。性格也很好，情绪价值非常足，两个人聊天的话题都能接得住，偶尔还带点小傲娇。玩的时候各种姿势也都很配合，骑在我身上的时候，还主动扭屁股上下摩擦，感觉很爽。🐍的时候，没有异味，反而有点甜甜的，嘴里还会轻轻呻吟一下，听得我硬硬的。小爱还会说点土味情话，给我逗笑了。✈️的时候，小爱也没有嫌累。最后选了个小爱喜欢看的，俩个人一起看了一会儿，结束
❤1
【评级分数】：8分 【时间】：8月8号 【位置】：君安店 【老师】： 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：难受得很 【环境】：良好 【满意程度】：7分 【服务详情】：进门环境挺好 下午一点左右去的女孩的选择不是很多 但是想来都来了就选了一个 虽然颜值不是很符我口味但是服务确实好 基本都挺到位 给个建议多加点女孩可以选择
❤1
【评级分数】：9分 【时间】：8月1号 【位置】：星海店 【老师】：露露 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：活着 【环境】：优美 【满意程度】：9分 【服务详情】：妹子长得还行，身材比例很好，环境就是类似于公寓内私影，妹妹也挺会玩暧昧 给我弄的很火 但是这里没有很遗憾 其他都还好 情绪价值服务都还行 希望下次服务套餐可以增加多一点
❤2
【评级分数】：8分 【时间】：7月14号 【位置】：君安 【老师】：小爱 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：匿名 【环境】：挺好 【满意程度】：9分 【服务详情】：熊大，人照差不多。服务还行。说话有点机车，其他都挺到位，🐍💋不是很主动还过得去，主要是去的时候 妹子有点少，可能是下午两点刚开门妹子都没到 下次再去看看别的 这个挺满意
❤1
【评级分数】：9分 【时间】：7月13号 【位置】：君安 【老师】：桃子 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：匿名 【环境】：在装修去的别的地方 【满意程度】：9分 【服务详情】：老师长得挺好，到地儿之后情绪价值跟的很足很好，很会聊天拨动情绪。服务基本都挺到位 推荐一下
❤1
【评级分数】：7分 【时间】：7月10号 【位置】：君安 【老师】： 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】：匿名 【环境】：还行 【满意程度】：8分 【服务详情】：一看到老师就是觉得是我喜欢的甜妹类型，然后进来的时候会服务先给我浅浅的按摩一下放轻松，然后就开始选电影了。放电影之后就跟妹妹躺下了，跟妹妹聊天的时候涉及的范围很广，情绪价值给的很到位，都会找话题，聊得很开心，后面就是摸摸抱抱亲亲循序渐进了。
❤4
【评级分数】：8分 【时间】：7.9 【位置】：君安 【老师】： 【套餐】：套餐三 【学生】： 【环境】：还行 【满意程度】：8分 【服务详情】：挺嫩的，颜值可以的，看起来很正宗的一个大学生妹妹，看起来很有学生气息但是又有妩媚气质，妹妹说也是刚入行不久，熊可以亲可以舔，胸部摸起来饱满结实，不是那种软绵绵的手感，微微有点外扩。整体体验不错
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qynbd666888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,091 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“出击报告” (@qynbd666888), 295 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qynbd666888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.