Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for aisyah

Channel

aisyah

@quron_ila_nur

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001585178996
TypeChannel
Username@quron_ila_nur
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 26 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/quron_ila_nur

Growth

1212 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 12 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 05:06 — 12 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:0113 Aug 2026, 05:06
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:0612no change
12 Aug 2026, 16:0112first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2142.0%
😢1938.0%
👍714.0%
🥰36.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2022 to 27 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2022, 15:51 UTC≈1,270 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

• Расулуллоҳ, сизни кўргим келяпти🥺😢 ©️Ҳасанхон Яҳё Абдулмажид @quranuz_kanali Telegram | Instagram | Youtube | Facebook

😢21

23 Nov 2022, 15:21 UTC≈1,260 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @abdah_ayyubiyyahPhoto

Муьминни энг хурсанд қиладиган нарса, севган бирини Аллоҳга ибодат қилишини кўришликдир. Ҳасан Басрий |Фатҳул Бари|

😢2

4 Nov 2022, 01:43 UTC833 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Жаброил алайҳиссалом Қуръонни олиб тушгани учун фаришталарнинг афзали бўлди. – Қуръон Муҳаммад алайҳиссаломга нозил бўлгани учун у зот халойиқнинг саййиди бўлдилар. – Қуръон Муҳаммад умматига нозил бўлгани учун Муҳаммад уммати энг яхши уммат бўлди. – Қуръон Рамазон ойида нозил бўлгани учун Рамазон ойи энг яхши ой бўлди. – Қуръон Қадр кечаси нозил бўлгани учун Қадр кечаси энг яхши кеча бўлди. Энди шу Қуръон қалбимиз

3

26 Oct 2022, 03:00 UTC498 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @musslihacademyPhoto

Абдуллоҳ ибн Ҳубайб розияллоҳу анҳудан ривоят қилинади: «Биз зулматли ёмғирли кечада Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам намоз ўқиб беришлари учун у зотни ахтариб кўчага чиқдик. У зотни топганимизда, «Айт», дедилар. Мен ҳеч бир нарса айта олмадим. Сўнгра яна: «Айт», дедилар. Мен ҳеч нарса айта олмадим. Сўнгра яна: «Айт», дедилар. Мен: «Эй Расулуллоҳ, нимани айтаман?» дедим. Шунда Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалл

2

14 Oct 2022, 18:50 UTC331 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Шундай ҳақиқатлар борки, уларни инкор қилишнинг имкони йўқ... Намозсиз роҳат йўқ, ота-онага яхшиликсиз барака йўқ, Қуръон тиловатисиз қалб шодлиги йўқ. @quranuz_kanali

😢2

10 Oct 2022, 13:01 UTC345 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Қуръон – бу ҳаётдир! Ибн Масъуд розияллоҳу анҳу айтади: «Ким Аллоҳни қанчалик севишини билмоқчи бўлса, ўзининг Қуръонга муносабатини кўрсин. Ким Қуръонни яхши кўрса, демак, у Аллоҳни яхши кўради, чунки Қуръон Аллоҳнинг каломидир». @quranuz_kanali Telegram | Instagram | Youtube | Facebook

9 Oct 2022, 02:40 UTC282 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Eshik taqqilaganda ro'moliga yuguradigan qizlardan ajoyibi yo'q...)❤️

3

8 Oct 2022, 06:09 UTC273 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @to_booksworldPoll

Rosululloh sollallohu alayhi vasallamning doyalari Shifo roziyallohu anho qaysi sahobaning onasi edilar?

  1. Zubayr ibn Avvom roziyallohu anhu32%
  2. Sa'd ibn Abu Vaqqos roziyallohu anhu22%
  3. Abdurahmon ibn Avf roziyallohu anhu39%
  4. Sa'd ibn Zayd roziyallohu anhu8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

7 Oct 2022, 16:51 UTC221 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hazrat_booksVideo

Nimaga konsertlarga boriladi? @Hazrat_books – Aqlingni oziqlantir📚

😢2

3 Oct 2022, 06:13 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @to_booksworldPhoto

Китобнинг тўлиқ номи - «Нурул яқийн фи сийрати Саййидил мурсалийн». Бунинг маъноси - Пайғамбаримиз соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам сийратларига оид ишончли нур - сўнмас зиё. «Нурул яқийн» муаллифнинг илк ёзган китобидир. Муҳаммад Хузарий ушбу асарини ёшлигида, 1895 йили - эндигина 23 ёшга тўлганида таълиф қилган. Ушбу китоб илк бор ҳижрий 1315, мил. 1898 йили Мисрда «Ал-жомеа» босмахонасида чоп этилган. @to_booksworld📚

2

3 Oct 2022, 06:13 UTC155 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @to_booksworldPhoto

Китоб ўқишнинг таъмини билганлар билади-ки, китоб ўқиш денгиз сувини ичишга ўхшайди – ичганингиз сари чанқайсиз, чанқаганингиз сари ичасиз! Ҳикмет Анил Ўзтекин @to_booksworld📚

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quron_ila_nur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2022, 06:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz88 voters

Rosululloh sollallohu alayhi vasallamning doyalari Shifo roziyallohu anho qaysi sahobaning onasi edilar?

  1. Zubayr ibn Avvom roziyallohu anhu32%
  2. Sa'd ibn Abu Vaqqos roziyallohu anhu22%
  3. Abdurahmon ibn Avf roziyallohu anhu39%
  4. Sa'd ibn Zayd roziyallohu anhu8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2022 to 27 November 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,172,327 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aisyah” (@quron_ila_nur), 12 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quron_ila_nur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.