Channel
@quokkastake
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001606035808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quokkastake |
| Description | Quokka Stake is a validator on many chains. Stake with us and get our latest updates here! More about us: https://quokkastake.io RU community: t.me/quokkastake_ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quokkastake |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 70 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 38.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2024 to 10 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Neutron Goes Sovereign Today another Neutron upgrade happened, and it's quite historical. Previously, Neutron was an consumer ICS chain of Comos Hub set up as a top-N chain where N = 95, which means the validators of the Cosmos Hub who fall in the top-95% voting power have to validate the chain, otherwise they are going to get slashed. This update converted Neutron chain to a sovereign one, with its own validator se…
🔥3
Horcrux Double Sign Recently, a bug in Horcrux, a key management service, caused one validator to get tombstoned. The bug was discovered quite a while ago, but its probability was extremely rare. And just a few days ago, one validator hit exactly this rare condition, which caused them to sign the same block with two different votes, causing a double sign, a permanent ban from the active set and a 5% slash of all to…
❤3
Scam attack on Cosmos ecosystem We are currently seeing a DDoS attack on multiple Cosmos ecosystems chains (namely, at least Sentinel, Neutron, Cosmos Hub and Stargaze). There are some actors that are sending every person in a blockchain a smallest amount of tokens (like 0.000001 ATOM on Cosmos Hub) and attaching a memo promising a free airdrop. This is a common scam scenario, and everyone interacting with such a we…
❤2
Happy New Year! On behalf on Quokka Stake validator, we want to wish you a happy New Year, and for you to accomplish all of what you’ve been planning and wishing for! For this year and in the past, we’ve always been there for you and will continue being there and improving ourselves to ensure your tokens would never be unsafe! Here’s what we’ve done for this year: - launched a Penumbra validator - improved our inf…
❤1
Shutting down our Decentr validator We are planning to shut down our validator on Decentr chain due to its stagnation and unprofitability after 1st of December. Our plan is to unbond all of our self-stake, effectively leading to the validator to leave the active set. Delegators' stake won't be slashed, but once the validator would go inactive, the stakers would stop receiving rewards. If you are staking to us and …
👍2
Cosmoverse: A Journey Worth Having So we’re safe and sound getting home from Cosmoverse. It was really great experience to have, meeting people you’ve known for a long time by their Discord and Telegram usernames, seeing new and old projects, discussing various things and having a great time! Thanks to Sentinel, which provided us the opportunity to visit it and to represent it, and to organisers, we think they did …
❤2
Cosmoverse: Let The Travel Begin We are just departing to Cosmoverse, the biggest Cosmos event ever. If someone sees our fancy mascot, say hi to him! If someone is there and wants to meet up, let @freak12techno know. Cheers!
🔥3
Cosmos Hub: Introducing Permissionless ICS Today, another Cosmos Hub upgrade would be happening. This upgrade bumps ICS (Interchain Security) version to v6, specifically adding two new features: - introducing permissionless consumer chains launch (e.g. without the need for an on-chain proposal) - allowing inactive validators to be a part of a consumer active set For a full list of changes and a pre-governance discu…
👏1
Nomic upgrade and Ethereum There was a recent Nomic testnet upgrade and it brings something extra interesting! It introduces the support of EVM chains and Ethereum. That means that soon it will be possible to relay nBTC between Bitcoin and Ethereum or other EVM chains and use BTC in Ethereum DeFi protocols. All of this sounds extra promising, and we really hope to see it soon on mainnet! For more details, feel fre…
❤1🔥1
Astronomer - Your pocket Telegram explorer We have a new tool that we wrote that might be really useful. It's called astronomer and it allows you to interact with any cosmos-sdk blockchain via a Telegram bot. Currently, you can: - see your wallet balances, rewards and delegations - search for a validator - see chain params - see chain supply, bonded ratio and community pool Feel free to test it out here: @CosmosAs…
🔥1
Penumbra Public Node Deployed We've recently added a public infrastructure onto Penumbra chain: - https://grpc.penumbra.quokkastake.io/ - Penumbra gRPC interface - https://grpc.penumbra.quokkastake.io/app/ - Penumbra web app/wallet - https://rpc.penumbra.quokkastake.io - Tendermint RPC - https://app.penumbra.quokkastake.io - a "minifront", which is kind of an explorer for Penumbra. Additionally, we've build up a wr…
Governance introduced in Nomic Nomic chain has implemented some kind of temporary governance procedure in order to collect Nomic validators' votes on Osmosis Revenue Share proposal. You can check the proposal itself here. This governance structure is quite different from what cosmos-sdk has: - proposals are not stored on chain (we think it's for now, but will change later) - there's no way to create a proposal, on…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @quokkastake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,391,140 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quokka Stake” (@quokkastake), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quokkastake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.