Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Барахолка Кулфидж вуф

@qulfij

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002447988932
TypeChannel
Username@qulfij
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qulfij

Growth

1379 Aug 2026, 06:48 — 137 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:28 — 137 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:4810 Aug 2026, 00:28
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:28137no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:48137first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.8%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
148
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held15 (23 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total886
Reactions total270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

634 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 530081660485712456313721.6%
custom 530797986298255483113621.5%
custom 53034799398471817599214.5%
🍓7411.7%
custom 5409177182331218478558.68%
custom 5220117798612673005436.78%
🥰396.15%
custom 5332407742881631797182.84%
custom 5471901915514150951172.68%
custom 522229211721630812391.42%
60.946%
custom 593609796507140422430.473%
custom 529673812109271692520.315%
20.315%
🤗10.158%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 634reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qulfij. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC107 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

чуть чуть задержался с постом ну ничоу, набросал что то на быструю руку ахаха в дальнейшем планирую улучшаться в качестве скетчей

custom 547190191551415095117custom 530081660485712456310🍓542custom 52967381210927169252custom 53034799398471817591custom 54091771823312184781

1 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC124 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

угадайте кто поддался изменениям в очередной раз. наша злюся 😁

custom 530797986298255483121custom 540917718233121847812custom 522011779861267300511🍓4custom 530081660485712456342custom 52222921172163081232custom 53034799398471817591

1 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC107 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026

в тт в сторис я закидывал зарисовку со Стэном одну, это ещё рисуется, так что ждите ехехе

custom 530081660485712456310🍓6custom 53034799398471817596custom 52201177986126730052custom 53079798629825548311

1 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC112 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

я не умер, я пахал ахаха зато появилось свободное время порисовать, хоть и с непривычки рисую уже по другому, не пугайтесь 🥺

🥰21🍓11custom 53034799398471817598custom 53008166048571245637custom 52201177986126730052custom 54091771823312184781

20 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC194 views53 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я всё ещё надеюсь в скором времени что то запостить из артов, пока что занимаюсь этим и играю в томодачи

custom 540917718233121847818custom 530347993984718175913custom 52201177986126730059custom 53079798629825548316🍓3custom 52222921172163081232custom 53008166048571245632

17 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC242 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026

немного я заработался, скоро будут зарисовки новые 🥰

custom 530797986298255483118custom 530081660485712456312custom 53034799398471817596🍓4custom 52222921172163081232custom 52201177986126730051

8 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC327 views60 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

опять щп, делюсь весёлым событием вчера я отмечал др своей друни Jude, и такую открытку ей нарисовал 🤗 мы смотрели совместно фильм Бейскетбол, вот так и проводят время художники стайлы 🥤

🍓23custom 530797986298255483115🥰11custom 52201177986126730054custom 53034799398471817593custom 53008166048571245632🤗1custom 53324077428816317971

6 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC300 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026

внезапный вброс этот скетч получился самым захейченным Х) по крайней мере, я ещё не видел такого, чтобы мне столько писали недовольства в личке. и причём причины у всех разные: кому-то не понравилось, как я изобразил стэна, кто-то посчитал, что рисовать агнст не совсем в моём стиле, а кто-то прикопался к тому, что я сигарету неправильно нарисовал, ахаха... хотя это скетч на быструю руку, в целом я мог допускать анат

custom 530081660485712456319custom 533240774288163179714custom 53079798629825548317custom 53034799398471817593🍓2🥰1custom 52201177986126730051

5 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC244 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

я кстати жив простите что пропадаю, в личной жизни разбираюсь с делами и это отражается на моем настроении, вот и грустные стайлы 😔

custom 530797986298255483121custom 53008166048571245637custom 53034799398471817597custom 52201177986126730053custom 59360979650714042243🍓2custom 54091771823312184782custom 53324077428816317971

28 Jun 2026, 20:59 UTC279 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026

пока что на этом закончу, если ещё накопятся вопросы - обязательно отвечу!! спасибо вам за уделённое время <)

custom 530347993984718175916🍓8🥰6custom 54091771823312184782custom 52201177986126730051

28 Jun 2026, 20:02 UTC291 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

анонка 🤗 http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=z54q4at ради интереса открою

custom 530081660485712456323custom 54091771823312184787custom 53034799398471817596🍓2custom 53324077428816317971

27 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC293 views44 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

всем приветули я чуть чуть клемаюсь после диплома, потихоньку начинаю активничать 🤗 ждите стайлов кстати, я небольшой скетч для вас отложил, но никак не выкладывал пхазп

custom 530797986298255483121custom 530081660485712456311custom 52201177986126730056custom 52222921172163081232custom 53034799398471817592🍓1custom 53324077428816317971

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @qulfij. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 666,886 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Барахолка Кулфидж вуф” (@qulfij), 137 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qulfij.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.