Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quite Harbor

Channel

Quite Harbor

@quiteharbor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

678subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594478083
TypeChannel
Username@quiteharbor
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/quiteharbor

Growth

678689683.57 August 2026 — 689 subscribers7 August 2026 — 689 subscribers8 August 2026 — 688 subscribers16 August 2026 — 685 subscribers24 August 2026 — 678 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 676–691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 16:33678-7
16 Aug 2026, 13:55685-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:17688-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:33689no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:21689first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.82%
avg views ÷ 678 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 June 202531 July 2026)
Views total53
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4550.6%
🥰1618.0%
1112.4%
🐳1112.4%
🤩55.62%
👎11.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC142 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC/USDT 4H график идет на коррекцию к 68.000: после этого уже будем смотреть как отреагирует рынок. Зона 60.000 теперь является поддержкой. При дальнейшем падении будем смотреть на ее реакцию первую. Более глубокий анализ дал в закрытой группе. Канал | Инстаграм | Подписка

👍2

6 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC146 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🐳5🥰1

6 Jun 2026, 01:59 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все же BTC пошел дальше в тренде вниз 👇. Четко по тех анализу отрабатывая зоны ликвидности. Остальные причины указал на фото☝️. Глобальный тренд у нас идет от 126.000 вниз ⬇️ но стоит понимать что он глобальный и по этому будет идти еще какое-то время.

👍1

4 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTC127 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Btc/Usd 4h Итак вот мы и пришли в начало импульса от февраля месяца. Из неприятного последний импульс верх (1 фиббо на графике) мы пробили ниже начала входа. Это значит что импульса вверх в рамках текущей волны мы уже не получим. Получается у нас возможна только коррекция вверх, скорее всего к 69000 долларов и потом либо мы идем еще ниже, либо топчемся в боковом диапазоне до формирования потенциального паттерна на с

👍3🤩1

29 May 2026, 14:30 UTC140 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤑Проп-трейдинг: что это такое на личном опыте на примере проекта Upscale 🟣В последнее время всё чаще вижу, как трейдеры переходят в проп-трейдинг. Если коротко объяснять механику, то ты торгуешь не своими деньгами, а капиталом компании. Твоя задача - пройти челлендж с правилами по рискам и прибыли. Если справляешься - получаешь доступ к более крупному счёту и забираешь большую часть профита себе. По сути, это способ

👍32🐳2🤩1

29 May 2026, 13:59 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Btc/Usd 4h как писал выше что ожидаю падение, оно и пошло. Далее по плану смотреть зону 74000 долларов, пока она выступает сопротивлением и закрепление от нее не произошло. Тут есть вариант с плавным развитием падения дальше или мы резко пробьем зону и закрепимся на ней. Пока в любом случае немного покрутимся в диапазоне и пособирают стопы. Канал | Инстаграм | Подписка

🤩2

19 May 2026, 15:47 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Xau/Usd 1D недавно объяснял инвестору в Дублине, что надо было продавать золотые слитки по цене 4500-5000 за унцию, а не сидеть с ними дальше. Это большой график с момента последней коррекции в 2022 году и до момента сейчас. Считаю что ЗОЛОТО отыграло свой цикл, при этом дав хорошо заработать всем инвесторам и трейдерам. Лично я последние пару месяцев работал на XAU в шорт играя на понижении. И думаю что если цена с

3🥰3

19 May 2026, 15:37 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC/USDT 4H инструмент не смог закрепиться выше отмеченной синим области, о которой говорил в предыдущем посте. Это значит что локальный нисходящий тренд будет продолжаться. К тому же общий геополитический фон с Ираном толкает рынки вниз. Основная поддержка будет находиться по цене 74.000, но если данная область не удержит цену то актив пойдет дальше вниз 👇. Канал | Инстаграм | Подписка

👍4🐳2

17 May 2026, 19:52 UTC135 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC/USDT 4H видим довольно четко картину с флагом и нахождение цены внизу данного паттерна. Далее, скорее всего, пробой вверх и заключительная волна роста. Однако очень важной для нас остается зона цены 79400-79600❗️, так как это зеркальный уровень и рост возможен только при его пробитии и закреплении выше. В другом случае если цена будет консолидироваться внизу уровня, то мы увидим серию продаж вплоть до 75.000 за б

👍2🥰2

1 May 2026, 13:31 UTC184 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Short closed. Канал | Инстаграм | Подписка

👍3

27 Apr 2026, 22:57 UTC200 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Актуальный, небольшой обзор текущей ситуации BTC/USDT. Канал | Инстаграм | Подписка

👍1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quiteharbor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quite Harbor” (@quiteharbor), 678 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quiteharbor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.