Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бросаю дизайн

@quitdesign

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001855109446
TypeChannel
Username@quitdesign
DescriptionРефлексия и философствование на тему всего с попыткой приземлить это на диджитал, дизайн и продукты. Автор @dimovniko
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/quitdesign

Growth

1318 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 131 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:46 — 131 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:189 Aug 2026, 00:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:46131no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:18131first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
20
Links
122

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3035.3%
🔥2225.9%
2124.7%
🤔67.06%
🤯55.88%
🤣11.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @quitdesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 May 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 12:05 UTC96 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Эппл в последние годы уже не про хороший UX, а про украшательства. Но тут они пришли к классической проблеме — мешающие анимации. В бете новой оси при скачивании приложения у тебя возникает окошко для подтверждения. НО ты должен дождаться конца этой долбанной анимации и только потом два раза кликнуть на кнопку включения. Иначе скачивание тупо не начнется. Подобная шляпа встречается у касс самообслуживания в маке. Т

👍3🤣1

16 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хорошая объяснялка, актуальна не только "эппл убила стартапы", но и для "зачем мне делать продукт, если есть чатгпт".

👍1

16 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @your_pet_projectPhoto

Про WWDC и новую iOS На этой неделе была презентация новой iOS, на которой Apple традиционно показала новую версию OS. Починили старые баги, добавили новых, ну и естественно завезли пачку фич. Например, камеру сделали умной. Теперь если ты наводишь на кусок торта камера предложит тебе записать калории в приложении Fitness. На этом моменте все авторы AI сканеров калорий в сторе напряглись, ведь теперь появлися но

2👍2

10 Jun 2026, 08:41 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хороший пример как можно рекламировать Алису ту же, которая КАЖДЫЙ РАЗ ВКЛЮЧАЕТСЯ ВО ВРЕМЯ РЕКЛАМ

🤯5👍2

5 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC126 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tatarroutinePhoto

оммаж работе Ивана

🔥5👍32

29 May 2026, 10:46 UTC136 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Открытые гайдлайны для создания безопасных водительских продуктов Хочу поделиться большой новостью — мы собрали воедино большой гайдлайн, который поможет продактам, дизайнерам и разработчикам, которые создают продукты, которыми могут пользоваться водители. Мы решили сделать этот гайд полностью открытым — внести вклад в безопасность на дорогах. К сожалению, полностью быть уверенными что пользователи перестанут пользо

🔥6👍1

26 May 2026, 06:49 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Уделяя внимание деталям, не забывай про общую картинку Вчера Ferrari представили свою первую полностью электрическую модель — Luce. И это... плохо. Мне не совсем понятно для кого это. Либо дело в новом молодом поколении, которому уже нафиг не нужны спорткары, либо у красных потенциальные финансовые проблемы в ближайшем будущем (опять же из-за возможности потерять рынок). Но суть моего поста не в этом. Модель показы

🤔4👍1

25 May 2026, 10:24 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Назрел ребрендинг AI Сейчас маркет-нормалом стала метафора Мэджик ✨ для любых AI-штук. В момент когда они только появлялись это действительно воспринималась как магия. Но прошло уже пару лет и это стало данностью. А метафора осталась. И на подходе уже AGI. Какой метафорой на ваш взгляд можно описать AI?

👍1

24 May 2026, 09:42 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как теоретически может поменяться разработка продуктов Внутри себя уже долгое количество времени пытаюсь понять как будет трансформироваться продуктовая разработка с распространением ИИ. Первая мысль, которая посещала — это жёсткий T-shape для уже существующих ролей. Будто роли останутся такими же, просто количество «голов» кратно уменьшится. Будто специалисты будут играть роль арт-директоров, хэдов и лидов, а место

3

18 May 2026, 09:03 UTC113 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Про логику правил Мир — сложная многогранная штука. Для того чтобы в нём не помереть (во всяком случае не сразу), люди придумали много правил. Но в какой-то момент правила становятся на столько ритуальными, что люди за ними перестают видеть истинную логику. Возьмём этикет. Например, по этикету нельзя ставить локти на стол. Почему? Потому что давно европейская буржуазия и всякого рода рыцари устраивали пирушки в мес

🔥5👍4

17 May 2026, 11:24 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На днях Питер Штайнбергер, создатель OpenClaw (хайпанувший проект для запуска ИИ-агентов) показал расход своей команды из 6 человек в месяц на токены. Их там на 1,6 млн долларов. Сразу понабежали в тредик люди с комментариями в стиле «да на эти деньги можно было нанять команду разработки». Да, можно было, но люди не совсем понимают экономику таких штук. Главное что сейчас даёт использование ИИ в разработке — скорост

👍4🤔2🔥1

16 May 2026, 13:20 UTC95 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У вас неправильный зелёный В старых городах на Золотом кольце стало больше попадаться восстановленных зданий с темно-зелёными крышами. Почему именно зелёными? Потому что раньше крыши домов оббивались медными пластинами, которые со временем окислялись и становились зеленоватыми. По этой же причине статуя Свободы зеленоватая. Но проблема в том что в ТЗ на восстановление чётко указано — крыша должна быть зелёной. И то

4👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @quitdesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,088,696 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бросаю дизайн” (@quitdesign), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quitdesign.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.