Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اسئلة

@question00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001458809409
TypeChannel
Username@question00
Descriptionمتنسوش لو حد حابب يسأل او يقول حاجة يتفضل https://curiouscat.me/MATRIX_2025
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/question00

Growth

1926 Aug 2026, 22:52 — 192 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 192 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:527 Aug 2026, 06:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:47192no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:52192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,300
Videos
100
Links
320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1878.3%
😢313.0%
👍14.35%
😱14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2021 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2025, 18:34 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ربنا يوفقكم اينما و كيفما كنتم 🌿

6

28 Sept 2025, 18:33 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يارب اي انسان كان هنا في يوم من الايام تكون ايامه ابسط و ايسر دلوقتي عن وقتها

6

31 May 2022, 08:29 UTC480 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

. صباحك حُصري يولدي 🧡🥰 https://t.me/El_minshawy

1👍1

20 May 2022, 19:34 UTC592 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من الاسكرينات اللي لاقيتها معايا 🤍

5

10 Feb 2022, 23:46 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

رأيكم ؟

  1. اتفق مع الكلام في الاسكرين53%
  2. اعارضه44%
  3. عندى رأي تاني هبعته على صراحة9%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Feb 2022, 23:45 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 7 August 2026

استفتاء سريع مهم جدا 🙏 + لينك صراحة https://curiouscat.me/MATRIX_2025

7 Jan 2022, 23:48 UTCviews —

اسئلة pinned «لينك صراحة القديم اتقفل خلاص لوجود العديد المشاكل التقنية في التطبيق بالتالي اللي عنده اي استفسار يقدر يتواصل معانا إما عالماسنجر او عن طريق لينك صراحة الجديد https://curiouscat.me/MATRIX_2025 و ميزته انك بتلاقي الرد قدام عينك و كله بيقدر يشوف سؤالك…»

7 Jan 2022, 23:48 UTC634 viewsread 7 August 2026

لينك صراحة القديم اتقفل خلاص لوجود العديد المشاكل التقنية في التطبيق بالتالي اللي عنده اي استفسار يقدر يتواصل معانا إما عالماسنجر او عن طريق لينك صراحة الجديد https://curiouscat.me/MATRIX_2025 و ميزته انك بتلاقي الرد قدام عينك و كله بيقدر يشوف سؤالك و الرد عليه هناك و لو انت ليك حساب على التطبيق ده بيديك تنبيه ان تم الرد على سؤالك و طبعا نأسف على التأخير في الرد الموديول اللي فاتت و ده كان بسبب مشاكل تقنية و بسبب

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @question00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Feb 2022, 23:46 UTCFinal Results81 voters

رأيكم ؟

  1. اتفق مع الكلام في الاسكرين53%
  2. اعارضه44%
  3. عندى رأي تاني هبعته على صراحة9%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2021 to 28 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اسئلة” (@question00), 192 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/question00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.