Channel
@quasarstaking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002184857851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quasarstaking |
| Description | Валидатор с ИИ поддержкой $ATOM $DGN $ELYS $SIDE $DVPN Ссылки: ИИ помощник - @QuasarValidatorBot Чат - @quasarvalidatorchat X - https://x.com/quasarstaking?s=21&t=93LIlmg YT - https://www.youtube.com/@QuasarValidator |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quasarstaking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 313 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 313 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
295 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 145 | 49.2% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 14.9% | |
| ⚡ | 38 | 12.9% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 12.5% | |
| 🤝 | 11 | 3.73% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 3.05% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.339% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.339% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.339% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Долгое время не было постов - новостей по Космосу нет 😢 Однако мы хотим обратить ваше внимание, что валидаторы Citadel.one и Cosmostation в скором времени прекращают свою работу, поэтому рекомендуем вам проверить ваши делегации и выбрать других валидаторов 💸 Мы же в свою очередь продолжаем ждать апдейтов и интересных новостей 👀
👍8👀3❤2🤝2
Cosmos Labs выкупили Mintscan и открыли подразделение в Южной Корее для расширения влияния в регионе 👀
👍13🔥4👀3✍2⚡1❤1
Появился очередной скам пропозал - голосуйте "No with veto" и не переходите по ссылкам!
👍5👀3⚡1❤1
Новостей почти нет, но небольшая сводка за последнее время есть 👇 • До 15 числа необходимо вывести все активы из сети Stargaze - после 15 мая нативная сеть остановится • Джае Квон выпустил большой пост о том, что прекращает употреблять и уходит в религию, а так же принес извинения перед ICL за нападки • Cosmos Rescue запустили свапалку - https://atomcircuit.net/ - с комиссий за свапы будет откупаться $ATOM • Робо…
👍5⚡4❤4
Не так давно в Космосе появилось голосование #1030 - это скам пропозал и мы голосуем “NO WITH VETO” Не переходите по ссылкам в данном пропозале и не голосуйте “YES”
👍6⚡4❤2🤝1
Мы голосуем “NO” по предложения Osmosis и вот почему 👀 1. Цена - Osmosis запрашивает непомерно высокую цену, которая выглядит сильно завышенной в текущих реалиях 2. ICL не планирует развивать DEX, поэтому деньги будут потрачены впустую 3. У Osmosis отличный продукт, но в текущем состоянии он не может конкурировать с топовыми DEX 4. Нет структурированного плана технической стороны миграции и дальнейшего развития …
👍10⚡4❤2🔥1
Появилось голосование по приобретению Osmosis 👇 https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/1029 Мы склоняемся к варианту “NO”, тк считаем данные траты слишком завышенными
👍6👌3🤝2❤1
AirDrop $GNOT 👀 Для проверки аллокации нужно ввести адрес Космоса на сайте - https://gno.land/r/gnoland/coins Критерии 👇 • Стейк Атома на момент снимка 20 мая 2022 года • бонус тем, кто голосовал “NO” или “NO WITH VETO” в #69 пропозале
👍4⚡2🔥2❤1
Новостей мало, но кое-что интересное есть 👀 Stargaze переехал на Cosmos и кто-то решил сделать дашборд с расчетами возврата инвестиций - выглядит очень забавно, а ознакомиться можно по ссылке 👇 https://stargaze-roi.cac-group.io/
👍5🔥3❤1
Новая драма вокруг сделки по Osmosis 👀 Не так давно Osmosis выступил с предложением о миграции на Cosmos (почитать можно тут), что изначально было воспринято с большим позитивом, так как собственный DEX для Космоса - очень важная и необходимая часть для будущего развития. Но в процессе обсуждения пропозала выяснился ряд неприятных обстоятельств 👇 • цена сделки - 23 млн $ • конвертация токена $OSMO на $ATOM на очен…
👍10🔥2❤1
Osmosis выступил с предложением полного переезда на Cosmos Hub 👀 https://x.com/osmosis/status/2031711362251178026?s=46&t=93LIlmgyfMouKjAWwEB7Fg Форум 👇 https://forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-draft-acquisition-and-merger-of-osmosis-into-the-cosmos-hub-aka-cosmosis/16717
👍11🔥8❤2
Япония и Космос - еще одна коллаборация? Появился пост о том, что банк Японии планирует протестировать использование блокчейна в рамках работы японской финансовой системы, но причем тут Космос? Магмар весь прошлый год совершал рабочие поездки в Японию, после которых делал небольшие намеки на то, что ведутся активные обсуждения об использовании стака Космоса для работы с банками и другими финансовыми организациями Я…
👍10❤5🔥2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quasarstaking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 489,770 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quasar Validator” (@quasarstaking), 313 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quasarstaking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.