Channel
@quantdrops
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
936subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001784076276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quantdrops |
| Description | Студент идущий за 100к$ банком По всем вопросам/реклама - @Diego4004 404_DAO - https://t.me/DAO_4004 Chat - https://t.me/+R9nxqim2-eM4ZWYy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quantdrops |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 936 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 936 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
35 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5220086947862574661 | 11 | 31.4% | |
| custom 5269460053651366623 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5271811599785534382 | 6 | 17.1% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я ухожу с этого канала чесно сказать канал меня заебал история с ним окончена, он был нашим дневником, мы его вели и развивали до тех пор пока наши дороги не разошлись, сейчас смысла в нем не вижу, да и кричать на всех углах что якобы я его спиздил, при том что первоначальный владелец и так весь живой трафик перетащил себе в канал, да и кинул меня в ЧС, ну такое себе Я перебрался в новый канал, пока что там особо н…
https://www.mexc.com/ru-RU/futures/ARK_USDT ебать
custom 52694600536513666232
Хорошо не жили, нехуй начинать😱 Сол по 80$ дайте И ЕТХ по 1800
🔥2
Сидел пердел и тут нашел пост что у Haha Wallet который я юзал для $MON появился чеккер проверить можете тут - https://www.haha.me/airdrop На аккаунты где был просто актив дали 3450 $HAHA Так же есть лиги, скорее всего за роли в дс: 🥉Bronze - 50k 🥈Silver - 250k 🥇Gold - 500k TGE q1 ждем, своих копеек 🔞
custom 52200869478625746611
Через 5 мин премаркет $MEGA на бинанс Рисует сейчас 1.5 млрд фдв что +50% для тех кто заносил в сейл Следим думаю уебут палку вниз на первой секунде
🔥3
🥹 INK запартнерились с OpenSea И в честь этого мы можем забрать памятную NFT, обычно они ничего не стоят и нихуя не дают, но можете забрать если делали их Guild и тд. Лично я уже почти год жду ретро, но что-то кракен никак не отпилит кусочек торта, ну я думаю в этом году они уже точно TGE, так что ждем ☕️
custom 52694600536513666232
Походу я один анлак, суккка ну хоть бы один дали жадные, в тп написали калабарду, что типо в зависимости от объема и разной активности система сама выдала и тд, сукаа у меня проебов на их бирже больше чем где либо, и что что я выносил те же деньги от туда сам факт пнл- значит комка должна быть у меня, кароче еще правда не все акки проверил, еще осталось пару штучек, буду серчить их в субботу, там просит лицо, а кенты…
custom 52694600536513666232
контора пидорасов, ни на один не дали суки блядь, я так надеялся, написал в ТП меня нахуй послали, кароче анлак остается сидеть смотреть как пацики в ДС флипают Че я так понял все смертные хуй сосут
Ну че ребятки лудо приключение 2.0 Вернули 0комсу на 30кк, это ж сколько можно напихать в карманы деняк ебанись, проверяйте акки, я сейчас сажусь проверять 100акков надеюсь хотя бы один будет без комсы Как прошуршу ферму дам знать
custom 52200869478625746613
Задумываюсь над ребрендингом фулл канала 🙃
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Крипта криптой, а у человека проблема, Толі син не хоче Толі син хоче
🔥4custom 52694600536513666232
Бля решил глянуть сколько стоит в Дубай к шлюхам поехать, ебать сам перелет в две стороны 1250$+, хата 7-10 дней до 1к$, ну клубы тусовки хоть раз в Дубае нужно там побывать + дохуя и шлюха самая элитная 400$, пиво на берегу моря 28$ за 0.5l Аренда гидрика 150$/h + аренда бибики от 150$ день за какую-то а6, а3, кароче если когда-то тут увидите фотки с дубайска, знайте я щаслив, а пока я кушаю яблочко и пью чайок
custom 52200869478625746614custom 52718115997855343822
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @quantdrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Задумываюсь над ребрендингом фулл канала 🙃
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 9 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,121,303 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QuantDrops ⚡️⚡️” (@quantdrops), 936 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantdrops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.