Channel
@qualitativeneo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
374subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001716849945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qualitativeneo |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qualitativeneo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 374 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 374 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
بفرست برای دوستان🌹 🪩Free Download Research Papers https://paperdownloader.com/ https://paperhub.ir/ https://sci.hubg.org/ https://sci-hub.ee https://sci-hub.es.ht https://sci-hub.is https://sci-hub.it.nf https://sci-hub.org.cn https://sci-hub.ren https://sci-hub.se https://sci-hub.shop https://sci-hub.st https://sci-hub.tf https://sci-hubtw.hkvisa.net https://sci-hub.mksa.top/ https://sci-hub.ru/ https://iranpaper.i…
🌟اگر موقع انجام یک کار اضطرابزا و سخت (مثل پایان نامه که احتمال کنار گذاشته شدنش بالا هست) برای فاصله گرفتن و اجتناب، یک پاداشی مثل اینستاگرام و وبگردی و سریال به مغزت بدی، به احتمال بیشتری کم کم اهمالکاری ایجاد و تثبیت میشود ✅چون یک چیز منفی و اذیت کننده را ازش میگیری و یک چیز مثبت و جذاب را بهش میدی ✅پس برای جلوگیری از ایجاد اجتناب و اهمالکاری، حتی اگر اون لحظه دست از کار کشیدیم و خواستیم استراحت کنیم، حداقل…
#نظر_شخصی 🔻مهمترین تجربه تلخی که از پایاننامه ها داشتم این بود که: ارائه یک پایاننامه ناقص و بد، خیلی بهتر از به تعویق افتادن و سنوات خوردن و تحت فشار بودن هست شما جلو برید، ادامه بدید، ایرادها را اساتید راهنما و داورها میگیرند و بعدش اصلاح میکنید، پایان نامه بخصوص در سطح ارشد ارزش خودخوری و اضطراب و اجتناب و حال بد را نداره، از طرفی هم الان نه اکثر داورها حوصله خواندن و ارزیابی کار را دارند، نه خیلیاشون سوادش ر…
🔻در نوشتن مقاله بخصوص برای ژورنالهای خارجی اگر قسمت روش یا متد را خوب و دقیق و طبق روال بنویسید شانس پذیرش را خیلی بالا میبرید، برای این کار چند نمونه مرتبط با مقاله خودتان از همان مجله ای که میخواهید سابمیت کنید را دانلود کنید و طبق اون بنویسید، در قسمت روش نیاز به هیچ خلاقیت و کار خاصی نیست فقط قراره بنویسید چکار کردید و ابزارتون چی بوده ولی خوب و دقیق و منظم نوشتنش خیلی پوینت مهمی هست.
نمونه رفرنس دهی با ونکوور
Voice message, posted without a caption
سلام عرض ادب شب بخیر برای نوشتن مقاله در قسمت رفرنس دهی یه سوال و ابهام پیش اومد. ظاهرا دونوع سَبک رفرنس دهی داریم که یکیش APA هست اون یکی ونکوور. جناب دکتر علیزاده محبت میکنید تفاوتشون رو توضیح بدید و اینکه باتوجه به کیفی بودن مقالاتِ ما،کدوم سبک بهتره و باید با کدوم سبک رفرنس دهی کنیم؟
بحران پایان نامه از جایی شروع میشه که میگیم «هنوز زوده و وقت زیاده»
پایاننامه و مقاله به زبانساده pinned a voice message
یک موتور جستجوی علمی که حاوی بیش از ۸۰ میلیون مقاله علمی منتشر شده در رشته ها و زمینه های مختلف است. تمام مقالات رایگان هستند و می تونید اونها رو در قالب PDF دانلود کنید. https://freefullpdf.com/#gsc.tab=0
این جواب یکی از داوران یکی از مجلات ISI به یکی از مقالاتم هست، من تا پارسال اصلا از چنین روشی اطلاع نداشتم، با یکی از بچه ها اتفاقی داشتیم سرچ میکردیم و یکم بلد شدیم، اون چون بیشتر سراغ کار را گرفت، فرستاد یک مجله خوب خارجی با IF بالا(بخاطر چنین رزومه ای هم به راحتی عضو هیئت علمی یکی از دانشگاههای شهر تهران شد)،ولی من مطمین نبودم بشه چاپش کرد و فرستادم به دو تا آی اس آی داخلی به شکل عجیبی هر جا فرستادیم جواب دادند و…
Minor revision This is a review article concerning the psychosocial experiences of people... . It is a well-structured and well-written manuscript. The reviewer #1 has some concerns that needs the authors’ attention. Other than that, I have no further comments, just two simple recommendations:
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qualitativeneo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
موافقید یک ویس درباره کلیت پایان نامه به زبان ساده بذارم؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2023 to 4 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پایاننامه و مقاله به زبانساده” (@qualitativeneo), 374 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qualitativeneo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.