Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -10,576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152,721–171,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 13:57
158,737
+69
9 Nov 2026, 16:50
158,668
+84
8 Nov 2026, 12:06
158,584
+272
7 Nov 2026, 04:15
158,312
+130
6 Nov 2026, 00:20
158,182
+91
5 Nov 2026, 03:11
158,091
+106
4 Nov 2026, 04:29
157,985
+76
3 Nov 2026, 06:00
157,909
+112
2 Nov 2026, 07:25
157,797
+97
1 Nov 2026, 07:48
157,700
+67
31 Oct 2026, 10:31
157,633
+62
30 Oct 2026, 10:06
157,571
+39
29 Oct 2026, 07:56
157,532
-5
28 Oct 2026, 05:35
157,537
+10
27 Oct 2026, 04:57
157,527
-21
26 Oct 2026, 07:07
157,548
+48
25 Oct 2026, 03:46
157,500
-25
24 Oct 2026, 03:20
157,525
+13
23 Oct 2026, 06:01
157,512
+8
22 Oct 2026, 09:26
157,504
first reading
Engagement
178 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.78%
avg views ÷ 158,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,300
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.613%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
178 (21 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
765,590
Reactions total
4,695
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,180
Videos
≈61
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
12,188 reactions across 172 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,243
75.8%
🔥
750
6.15%
❤🔥
357
2.93%
👍
343
2.81%
💯
245
2.01%
🤯
244
2.00%
🤔
243
1.99%
⚡
179
1.47%
👏
165
1.35%
👌
162
1.33%
😢
157
1.29%
✍
65
0.533%
😁
35
0.287%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (12.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نداء لمختبري المبكر 🚨
قبل ما ننزل ملف التسريبات
شاكين أن فيه نموذجين للاختبار مو واحد
بسبب كثرة كلام الطلاب واختلافهم
لذلك أي سؤال شفتوه تسرب بمصادر ثانية وجاكم بصيغة أخرى متأكدين منها، او سؤال ما تسرب وما شابه، أرسلوه لنا على البوت 👇
@YellowqtBOT
وصلوا الرسالة لكل الطلاب 🔴
وشكرا لتعاونكم 💛
الله يرزق القبول لكل من يرسل لنا 🥰
#التسريب رقم 6 🔥
من سلسلة تسريبات دورة التحصيلي الجديدة 💥
◉ بعض المزايا الجديدة الي بتكون في الموقع
1️⃣ تصميم جديد وحديث وتجربة مستخدم أسطورية
2️⃣ نظام فلاش كاردز (بطاقات مراجعة)
3️⃣ نظام لإضافة أصدقاء للمذاكرة سويةً
4️⃣ تقسيم مقاطع التأسيس والتجميعات حسب الفكرة/السؤال لتسهيل التنقل داخل المقطع
5️⃣ ليدربورد تنافسي
وغيرها من المزايا الي تنتظركم 😉💛
انتظرونا في تسريبات أُخرى 😉
يلو نحو المئوية 💯👑
والمضحك جدًا اللي يقولون جانا من فلان وما جانا من يلو، أو يلو ما يجي منه ذاكروا من فلان ⁉️
نبشركم أن يلو أشمل مصدر ومافيه أي سؤال "حقيقي" أو معلومة موجودة بمصادر أخرى وماهي موجودة بيلو 💛
يلو لحد الآن أعلى مصدر في عدد المئويات بالاعتيادي والقبولات بالمبكر ولله الفضل والمنة والحمد ⭐
عموما الحملة واضحة وصريحة وبنقفل الموضوع على كذا، وبإذن الله ملف التسريبات بينزل بكرة 👌
يلو نحو المئوية 💛💯
يلو نحو البترول 🫡 🇸🇦
وجب التوضيح 😇⛔️
كما ذكرنا سابقًا أن "اختبار المبكر يجي تقريبًا 3 أقسام نسخ لصق (50 - 60 سؤال كمجموع) والباقي أغلبه نفس الأفكار والجديد قليل" ...
وهذا فعلًا اللي حصل وورد ولله الحمد، و90% من المختبرين أكدوا ذلك، وشفنا التسريبات تؤكد ذلك أيضًا، فهذه أصبحت حقيقة وليست رأي لأن النموذج موحد للجميع!
طيب بخصوص اللي يقولون ما خرج من يلو، وهذا فعلًا الكلام صحيح، ما خرج من يلو مو معناها الاختبار كله نسخ لصق! معناها أن الاخت…
#التسريب رقم 5 وأخيرا 🔥
من سلسلة تسريبات دورة التحصيلي الجديدة 💥
🟣 معلمين مادة الكيمياء 😍
1️⃣ ملك الكيمياء ومحبوب الجميع الأستاذ هايزنبيرغ "علاء سحلول"
2️⃣ والأستاذ القدير المعروف لا يعرف محمد زيادة
3️⃣ الأستاذة المبدعة والمتألقة منار العطاس
أقوى وأفضل معلمين المجال بلا منافس مع يلو بفضل الله 😎
بنعلن عن باقي المواد بتسريبات أخرى 😉
يلو نحو المئوية 💯👑
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @qtahsili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@qtahsili edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @qtahsili as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
7
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
7
vacant every time we have ever looked
@qtahsili named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@coeeeeq named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@coeiiii named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@dralaa2033 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@em7ksau named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@i4nxe named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@ialbraa named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@ie_ie8 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
محمد تحصيلي @moh_5519 · 120,829 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
الكنز | تحصيلي 2026 @AlKanz1 · 62,004 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
تحصيلي أ.غشام @Ghasham22 · 132,841 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
آرام التعليمية للخريجين (القناة) @araam_edu · 39,357 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
تسريبات سايفر 2026 @CypherDojo · 205,530 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
منارة | manarah @qadrat_a · 86,778 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
تسريبات سايفر 2026 @ufnvt · 31,858 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 4 September 2026
أ. فيصل باسل 👨🏻💻 قدرات وتحصيلي @faisaleducation · 41,812 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
تسريبات تحصيلي @tahsele_0 · 142,504 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
المعاصر قدرات وتحصيلي - عماد الجزيري @vip_qustion · 336,225 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
كمي فرسان @gg_mmd · 32,229 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
قناة تجميعات ستيب STEP الحساني @step_alhassani · 388,500 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
بنوك مصباح | قدرات - الأقسام الأكثر تكرارًا يوميًا @M9BA7Q3 · 81,492 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
المنصف في القدرات @MahmoudMonsef · 293,650 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
سحاب للقدرات ☁️ @Sahab_q1 · 70,606 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
الشركة العربية للأستثمار @ksaaic · 39,935 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
التحصيلي والقدرات مع فرح ابراهيم @fr007y2021 · 18,426 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
تجارب طلاب المعاصر @Almoaser · 68,618 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
قناة تحصيلي وتد 💯⚡️ @WTD_tahsiliQ · 35,734 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
منصة وي كان ستيب WE CAN @EnglearningSt · 25,265 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
مُعين🔆|جامعي @H2_GG · 65,315 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منصة يَلو - تحصيلي” (@qtahsili), 158,737 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qtahsili.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.