Channel
@gg_mmd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,563subscribers
-279 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001895953186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gg_mmd |
| Description | قروب المناقشة https://t.me/ggg_mg |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gg_mmd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 35,563 | -87 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 35,650 | -66 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 35,716 | -84 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 35,800 | -42 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 35,842 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
614 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 272 | 44.3% | |
| 😴 | 76 | 12.4% | |
| 🤡 | 70 | 11.4% | |
| 😐 | 52 | 8.47% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 6.35% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 6.03% | |
| 😭 | 25 | 4.07% | |
| 🙊 | 9 | 1.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.977% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 0.651% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.651% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.489% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.326% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.326% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.326% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.326% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.163% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-يجب على كل طالب التسجيل على قناة ”فرسان للقادرات“. سيتم نشر أحدث المعلومات حول التدريب والجدول الزمني وتفاصيل الدورة التدريبية الأخرى هناك. ‼️ -لا تنسى التسجيل حتى لا تفوتك معلومات مهمة عن تدريبك! 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/ttdpse_bot🤖❤️ https://t.me/ttdpse_bot🤖❤️ 🤖❤️https://t.me/ttdpse_bot
❤39😐22🤡14👍6🎃2👾1
قروب المناقشة تعالو @ggg_mg
❤5
@ttdpse نزلت كل البنوك الي تخصنا💎
❤9👍3
@ttdpse نزل بنك ٥١ هنا
❤5
قناة الملف والتحديثات (اضغط هنا ) قناة التسريبات ل يوم اختبارك (اضغط هنا) قناة المناقشة @ggg_mg
❤10👍1
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته اي مختبر ذاكر من ملفنا اتمنى يرسل درجته عشان نستمر والكل يشوف درجات طلابنا لابطال @tt6_q وفالكم اعلى الدرجات والمناصب في الدنيا والاخره
❤15👍1
كمي فرسان pinned «https://t.me/ttdpse هنا البنوك بتتحدث🙏»
https://t.me/ttdpse هنا البنوك بتتحدث🙏
❤9👍7❤🔥1
يله اصحى وحله ماياخذ معك نص ساعه الا وانت مخلص
❤16😴4🤡3👍2
اتوقع انه افضل بدايه مساء
❤12🤡5👍2
File, posted without a caption
❤23👍4🤡2😘2❤🔥1
يعني كل مازادت البنوك مثلا الحين يجيك ٦٠٪ اذا زادت ١٠٠٪
❤32🤡8❤🔥4😭4🎃2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gg_mmd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gg_mmd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كمي فرسان” (@gg_mmd), 35,563 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gg_mmd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.