Channel
@qqzlj66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
186subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004291387701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qqzlj66 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 24 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qqzlj66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 186 | +41 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 145 | +35 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 110 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 110 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,527 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐉 抓龙筋 vs 打飞机✈️ 看似相似，其实天差地别。 💧 目的不同 • ✈️ 打飞机：只是发泄，一时快感。 • 🐉 抓龙筋：调理气血、放松经络、养护前列腺。 一个是“泄”，一个是“养”。 ⚙️ 效果不同 • 打完飞机，人会空、累、乏。 • 做完抓龙筋，身体轻、气血顺、精神好。 一个让你虚， 一个让你稳。 💆♂️ 体验不同 打飞机是瞬间刺激，结束就没了。 抓龙筋是深层放松，越做越通透。 一个在耗能量， 一个在唤醒能量。 #沈阳 #抓龙筋 # 预约：@qqzlj6
❤1
哥哥周末愉快，🉑约🉑上门
哥哥早上好，🈶位🉑预约🉑上门
【评价时间】：2026-08-04 【老师名字】：琪琪 【学生名字】：kiA 【人照相似】：8 【身材评分】：9 【敏感程度】：10 【主动程度】：10 【敬业程度】：10 【综合评分】：9.9 【总分】：9.48 【出击描述】：第一次前高体验交给了老师，感觉十分新奇，被老师按的甚至想学小狗叫，大脑已经完全失控了。 人照方面，和图片不太一样，老师个子小小的一只，图片里看起来像是御姐类型，其实本人是偏可爱类型的，颜值很耐看，越看越漂亮。 手法方面没的说，满分一百打一百，这次我做的是699套餐，进门简单冲洗就开始按摩，按摩体验上就非常专业，可以说是目前为止所有体验过带按摩的老师中手法最好的 后面的抓龙筋、龟责、前高更是直接爽上天，手法专业，力度适中，过程中还会和你沟通，关注你的感受。体验满分的同时情绪价值也是满分。唯一美中不足的是我比较敏感，没挺多久就控制不住了，好希望能多爽一会。但是即使结束了，老师还会贴心的做善后工作，绝对满分的…
哥哥早上好，今日开课，🉑约🉑上门
【评价时间】：2026-08-03 【老师名字】：琪琪 【学生名字】：匿名 【人照相似】：10 【身材评分】：10 【敏感程度】：10 【主动程度】：10 【敬业程度】：10 【综合评分】：10 【总分】：10 【出击描述】：约的999课，老师非常认真，手法非常好，感觉打开了新世界😂，规则非常爽。下次有机会还会约 by：🌈沈阳丶全城热恋： @SYQCRL
开课，🉑预约🉑上门
哥哥晚上有位哦，🉑上门
开课了，🉑约🉑上门
【评价时间】：2026-07-30 【老师名字】：琪琪 【学生名字】：匿名 【人照相似】：10 【身材评分】：10 【敏感程度】：10 【主动程度】：10 【敬业程度】：10 【综合评分】：10 【总分】：10 【出击描述】：十分好评，老师最近刚来的，手法十分专业。 会完整走完整个流程，不会特意去看手机，沉浸感非常不错，时间上也不会特意去缩短，完事还有头疗，很舒服 做的699前高的，第一次感受到了前高的爽，下次试试999的。前半部分按摩也是十分专业，很舒缓疲惫，感觉能睡个好觉了。然后在导入的时候也很懂，有小要求也能配合。最后也不会特意为了释放而加快，而是寸止好几次到最爽时候才会释放，很有节奏。 总体来说非常好评了，很专业，体验感非常不错 by：🌈沈阳丶全城热恋： @SYQCRL
开课中.....欢迎哥哥预约
❤1
🈶位，🉑约哦
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @qqzlj66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 834,885 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“沈阳琪琪的龙筋频道” (@qqzlj66), 186 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqzlj66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.