Channel
@qqqee313
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
251subscribers
+238 since we began measuring on 11 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004322204863 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qqqee313 |
| Created | 10 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qqqee313 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 251 | +5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 246 | +89 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 157 | +144 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:22 | 13 | no change |
| 11 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 13 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 10 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (10 October 2026 – 11 October 2026) |
| Views total | 456 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🎰 福田甜饼 @qqqee333 半价优惠券 📮 参与条件： 🌏️ 归属地 广东 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-深圳18甜饼后宫🉑🐍69 🎫 加入-深圳·乱世俏佳人（备用群） 🎫 加入-深圳·乱世俏佳人 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 33 条 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 福田甜饼 @qqqee333 半价优惠券 限p × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 1：中奖者24小时内私聊老师兑奖； 2：开奖3天内没有兑奖的，则过期无效； 3：兑奖需要出击完提交详细报告：@Szqiaojiarenbg_bot 4：不去私聊管理 @bingmeishijiabing 回收 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年10月14日 13时20分00秒
#福田甜饼 10月11日荣登深圳学院名师榜👑 ❤️名师榜: @sz520 ❤️聊天群: @sz1314 ❤️ 郑重承诺: 高质量/真老师/真学生/活跃社区，若您在【深圳学院】联系的老师货不对板，被骗定金，群主: @sz333 担保赔付！每月赞助万元出击费🧧 立即加入 👆查看评价
认证视频哦 开课啦头课预约哦
【所在位置】：#福田 【老师艺名】：甜饼 【联系方式】：@qqqee333 【验证留名】：和登 【验证时间】：9月22号 【上课价位】：900 【人照几成】：8成 【颜值分数】：8分 【身材分数】：8分 【课表服务】：课表上 【态度分数】：8分 【优点缺点】：听话 【推荐程度】：8星 【体验细节】：按照老师指示来到课室，老师与照片8.5成像是，身材有肉，嫩妹般服务，胸状很好摸着手感极佳柔软舒爽，先传教士式后面就是各种姿势老师都很配合来一遍，间中🐍一下，🐍吻时表情楚楚可怜忍不住吻多数下，69无异味，叫得好好听，实在是受不了123啦最后顺利出水，整体来说我都很满意，好评推荐！ 深圳研究协会： https://t.me/bvcgzf588 研究协会严厉打击报告造假提交报告必须有相关约课记录 每提交一份真实有效报告，奖励50人品 ✍️报告提交点击[ @SZYJ2bot ]
🎰 福田 甜饼 半价抽奖（@qqqee333） 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-深圳乌鸦🐦⬛️の榜单轮播群 🎫 加入-深圳18甜饼后宫🉑🐍69 🎫 加入-深圳乌鸦🐦⬛️已认证榜单+优惠情报 🎫 加入-乌鸦成群🐦⬛️🐦⬛️嫩妹聊天吧 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 10 条 🎫 加入-深圳乌鸦のSex Note 🍌 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ ❤️半价优惠劵❤️ × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 中奖后3天联系老师出击（老师问题除外），出击后24小时发报告，否则拉黑。 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年10月14日 12时00分00秒
新人哥哥们多多关照哦 个人：@qqqee333 双向：@qqqee333bot
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @qqqee313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳18甜饼后宫🉑🐍69” (@qqqee313), 251 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqqee313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.