Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Eda ot DEEBshik

Channel

Eda ot DEEBshik

@qqDEEBshik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

339subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002261617644
TypeChannel
Username@qqDEEBshik
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qqDEEBshik

Growth

339340339.57 August 2026 — 340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 340 subscribers15 August 2026 — 339 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:16339-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:30340no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:17340first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

606 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥22937.8%
9916.3%
🔥9916.3%
🍓7211.9%
345.61%
🙏223.63%
custom 5960659074855998069213.47%
💋111.82%
🎄91.49%
💘91.49%
🎉10.165%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 606reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 7 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
41
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qqDEEBshik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 1 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 19:58 UTC≈11,000 views100 reactions41 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дисс, Клю.... вы так изменились ....

🔥63❤‍🔥21🙏103🍓3

29 Mar 2026, 08:52 UTC≈5,840 views140 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕ МОЙ ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИИИЯЯ!!!!!!! :DDDD люблю всех вас! спасибо что даже сейчас остаётесь со мной ❤️ я очень рада хоть что то пытаться для вас рисовать💋 Самый лучший подарок для такой маленькой гниды- репостик работ 💅

❤‍🔥9326🔥191🍓1

25 Feb 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,440 views97 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

ооооочеень милая коллаба с нашими зайками Дисс, Ёлка и Клюква, который пошёл на стендик ☺️💞💞 Также очень хайповый принт на кружку !!! Который я делала вместе с милой клюквой 😍 И такой же хайповый дизайн на брелок😛 и это всё было в посылке санчеза от нашей незабываемой немо!!!!👋👋👋

🍓68🔥1791🎄1💋1

2 Feb 2026, 20:37 UTC≈1,120 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ImDisssPhoto

мои два часа на астрасмп 😱

267

2 Feb 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,090 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

астру обязательно запустят 🐈

50🙏12🎄83

31 Dec 2025, 16:52 UTC≈1,530 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

и лично слова от меня, я очень извиняюсь за такое долгое отсутствие ((( я про вас не забывала мои любимые!!! я очень много работала,но все работы я не могла выкладывать (((( но надеюсь в 2026 году всё станет ярче, и вы не будете видеть тут только одни коллабы)) т.к скоро они будут выкладываться не сюда 🔔 С НАСТУПАЮЩИМ 2026 годом!🔴🔴🔴

❤‍🔥39💋83

31 Dec 2025, 16:43 UTC≈3,880 views113 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍭С НАСТУПАЮЩИМ НОВЫМ ГОДОМ МОИ ДОРОГИЕ!!!🍭 💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡 сегодня мы приглашаем вас на утренник в детском саду !🍷🍷🍷 встречайте наших деток: DISS Клюква Ritsze СмЭшик Elluka Haazish REEEX Все детки очень старались! поддержите их!!!🎁 💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡💡

❤‍🔥76custom 596065907485599806921💘94💋2🎉1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @qqDEEBshik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 724,815 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Eda ot DEEBshik” (@qqDEEBshik), 339 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqDEEBshik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.