Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for در جستجوی خوشبختی

Channel

در جستجوی خوشبختی

@qohappiness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

390subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001032621184
TypeChannel
Username@qohappiness
Descriptionکانال دکتر آروین آذرگین پژوهشگر علوم انسانی، نویسنده، مشاور و روانشناس موضوع مطالب: سلامت روان، خوشبختی و معنای زندگی (با نگرش فلسفی فراطبیعی) هماهنگی جلسات در واتساپ: 09382722145 تماس با مدیر: https://telegram.me/arvin_azargin [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/qohappiness

Growth

3905 Aug 2026, 22:09 — 390 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:05 — 390 subscribers5 Aug 2026, 22:096 Aug 2026, 20:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 389–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:05390no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:09390first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 390 subscribers
Avg views / post
115
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 December 20255 August 2026)
Views total574
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
530
Videos
41
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4969.0%
👍1825.4%
👏34.23%
🤯11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹میزان هوشبهر متعارف یا آی‌کیو (IQ) از نوزادی تا حدود ۲۰ سالگی افزایش پیدا می‌کند و از حدود ۳۰ تا ۳۵ سالگی تا پایان عمر کاهش می‌یابد. این هوش بیشتر یه جنبه‌های تحلیلی، منطقی و ریاضی مغز ما برمی‌گردد. 🔸اما به گفته‌ی دانشمندان، هوش هیجانی (EQ) که بیشتر راجع به خلق‌وخو، احساس‌ها و روابط ما است، و تاثیر بیشتری هم بر موفقیت و بهزیستی ما دارد، خوشبختانه می‌تواند حتی تا پایان عمر با افزایش آگاهی و تمرین ارتقا پیدا کند. 🔹ب

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

شگفتا که تفکر سطحی رایج، باورهای معنوی (مانند باور به خدا؛ زندگی بعد از مرگ؛ وجود ارزش‌های واقعی؛ و ارزشمندی زندگی به‌سان پرورشگاه روح) را نامعقول دانسته، به مسخره می‌گیرد، اما پوچی، زوال و تباهی اخلاقی ناشی از باورهای ماده‌گرایانه را نامعقول و فاجعه‌بار تلقی نمی‌کند! زیستن باری به هر جهت، دست‌شستن از زندگی مسئولانه، یا پناه جستن به لذت‌جویی سطحی یا مواد روان‌گردان، اغلب حاوی نوعی احساس بی‌معنایی نسبت به ذات زندگی ا

👍6

29 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC104 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هیچ‌جا، هیچ خبری نیست؛ مگر بعضی جاها! @Qohappiness

🤯1

27 Jul 2026, 03:22 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

به مناسبت درگذشت اکبر عبدی دوست‌داشتنی که خاطرات خوبی برای ما بجا گذاشت. @Qohappiness

4👏2

23 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC201 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

شناسایی ارزش‌های زندگی‌مان و تلاش برای زیستن مطابق با آنها به زندگی بامعنا می‌انجامد. آیا شما ارزش‌هایتان را می‌شناسید و بر اساس آنها زندگی می‌کنید؟ این فایل به شما کمک می‌کند! دکتر آروین آذرگین @Qohappiness

4

15 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC200 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

روانشناسی سوگ: 🔸بسیاری از روان‌درمانگران اصرار دارند که فرد داغدار باید پیوندهای عاطفی با عزیزان از دست رفته را کنار بگذارد و دلبستگی به متوفی را با افراد و علایق دیگر جایگزین کند (مانند شغل، همسر جدید یا حیوان خانگی). 🔸با این حال، برخی درمانگران سوگ اکنون متوجه شده‌اند که افراد به سادگی از نظر روانی از عزیزان از دست رفته خود جدا نمی‌شوند. آنها همچنان به فکر کردن، احساس کردن، صحبت کردن و حتی درخواست مشاوره از آنها

3

13 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC154 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @khanehekmat_officialPhoto

خانهٔ حکمت برگزار می‌کند: 🔸مدرسه تابستانه فلسفه و‌ زندگی ۲ فلسفه چگونه بر زندگی ما موثر است؟ 🔹با ارائه: 👤دکتر آروین آذرگین 👤دکتر مرضیه پیراوی‌ونک 👤خانم نازنین جمشیدیان 👤دکتر مهدی شهابی 👤دکتر رضا کورنگ بهشتی 👤دکتر محمدعلی منانی 👤دکتر علیرضا منجمی 👤دکتر علی ولی‌زاده 📅 چهارشنبه و پنجشنبه ۳۱ تیرماه و ۱ مردادماه ۷ و ۸ مردادماه 📌 کارگاه به دوصورت حضوری در محل خانهٔ حکمت اصفهان و مجازی (اسکای روم) برگزار خواهد

5

10 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

راه آشنایی با ویژگی‌ها و تمایلات ناهشیار، خودشناسی است. استفاده از مشاوره و روانکاوی می‌تواند خیلی کمک کند. در صورت تمایل به مطالعه در مورد ناخودآگاه یا ناهشیار کتاب زیر از دکتر آروین آذرگین توصیه می‌شود (بخش روانکاوی): https://ketabrah.com/go/b60301

👍2

10 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC140 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

یونگ می‌گوید: به‌عنوان یک قانون، تصمیمات مهم زندگی، بیشتر از غرایز و عناصر ناشناخته و مرموز ناهشیار ناشی می‌شوند تا اراده‌ی هشیار و منطق معنادار. حالا از نظر شما بیشتر تصمیمات مهم زندگی‌تون (مثل انتخاب شغل، ازدواج یا مهاجرت) بر چه اساسی بوده؟

  1. از روی آگاهی، اراده و تدبیر16%
  2. از روی علایق و عناصر پنهان ناهشیار58%
  3. نمی‌دونم واقعا، تشخیصش سخته!26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC211 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

《تیم ملی فوتبال ایران قربانی سامانه VAR شد!》 😢 ⚽️چند روز پیش این جمله را جایی خواندم. نمی‌دانم شما قبولش دارید یا نه؟ واقعا چند تا گل قشنگ زدیم و VAR (سامانه داوری مجهز به دوربین) مردودش کرد. خیلی ناراحت شدم و دوست داشتم تیم‌مان نتیجه‌ی بهتری می‌گرفت. ⚽️ اما این فکر که ما قربانی VAR شدیم اگر احساسات را کنار بگذاریم از واقعیت دور است! چرا؟ سه داور مخصوص این کار نشسته‌اند و با دوربین‌های دقیق، خطاها و به‌خصوص آفساید

👍43👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qohappiness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

یونگ می‌گوید: به‌عنوان یک قانون، تصمیمات مهم زندگی، بیشتر از غرایز و عناصر ناشناخته و مرموز ناهشیار ناشی می‌شوند تا اراده‌ی هشیار و منطق معنادار. حالا از نظر شما بیشتر تصمیمات مهم زندگی‌تون (مثل انتخاب شغل، ازدواج یا مهاجرت) بر چه اساسی بوده؟

  1. از روی آگاهی، اراده و تدبیر16%
  2. از روی علایق و عناصر پنهان ناهشیار58%
  3. نمی‌دونم واقعا، تشخیصش سخته!26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

اگر تجربه شخصی دارید، آیا این نظر را تایید می‌کنید که اوج عشق محدود و نهایتا حدود دو سال است؟

  1. بله، همین حدوده23%
  2. نه، به نظرم از این هم کمتره23%
  3. نه، بیشتره و می‌تونه به‌‌مرور زمان بیشتر هم بشه55%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“در جستجوی خوشبختی” (@qohappiness), 390 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qohappiness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.