Channel
@qiuzhi1188
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003056252256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qiuzhi1188 |
| Created | 24 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qiuzhi1188 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 64 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 63 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 63 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (24 August 2025 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 31 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
28 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 78.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
聊手薪资待遇：聊手固定800美金底薪 1万以下7%提成 5万以下8%提成 5万以上9%提成 8万以上10%提成 15万以上提成12% 30万以上提成15% 1000美金以下无抽成 0-3万业绩底薪800+抽成 3万以上业绩底薪800+抽成 10万以上业绩底薪800+抽成 组长待遇： 人均5000以下：底薪1000+无抽成 人均5000以上：底薪1000+抽成0.5% 人均1万以上： 底薪1000+抽成1% 人均2万以上：底薪1200+抽成2% 人均3万以上：底薪1500+抽成3% 人均5万以上：底薪1500+抽成4% 主管待遇： 1500美金加抽成 人均业绩必须达到5000美金抽成1% 人均业绩达到11000美金按照2% 人均业绩人均22000美金以上3% 人均业绩人均33000美金以上4% 5000以下无抽成 业务员：做满一年以后，续签1年（底薪涨：200 ） 管理：奖励1000 底薪不变
招聘岗位 招聘要求： - 中国籍 - 年龄：18—40岁 - 工作地点：巴基斯坦 · 伊斯兰堡 - 岗位职责：具体工作内容私信 薪资待遇： - 底薪：10000元人民币/月 - 提成：另算 - 综合月收入：30000—50000元人民币（底薪+提成） 有意向者欢迎咨询，具体工作内容、福利待遇及发展情况可详细沟通。 联系：- @dididiwo 订阅：- @qiuzhi1188
❤1
求职三个人在柬埔寨 国籍：- 巴基斯坦 目前所在地：柬埔寨 1. Taj 在美国平台担任客户开发（客户寻找）工作，拥有 1 年经验。 2. Sami Ullah 在美国平台担任客户开发（客户寻找）工作，拥有 1 年经验。 3. Mahi 拥有 2 年经验，曾在多个平台开展客户开发和指导工作，包括美国、欧洲、印度和沙特阿拉伯市场，并担任导师（Mentor）。 联系：- @dididiwo 渠道：- @qiuzhi1188
伊斯兰堡需要中国籍跟越南籍，资金盘 底薪10000左右，抽成6-12 @dididiwo
求职： 模特会印地语,英语, 之前约会盘有经验 @nidedidi 合作：- @dididiwo 订阅：- @qiuzhi1188
❤3
群主求职 国籍：中国 经验：幸运商城快杀，综合幸运盘客服+小额出入款 年龄：39 人在哪：斯里兰卡，可去巴基斯坦 @WDF2026 合作：- @dididiwo 订阅：- @qiuzhi1188
❤5👍1
求职： 巴基斯坦内 江西，女 现在主打ws实卡接码 TG ，复接稳定 28岁 @xr2025130 订阅： @qiuzhi1188
❤3👍1🔥1
招聘岗位：印度精聊主管 工作地点：巴基斯坦 · 伊斯兰堡 招聘要求： 必须是 中国籍人员。 有 印度精聊相关经验至少6个月以上。 带过团队，有团队管理经验。 会使用电脑和基本办公软件。 最好会英语，能够与巴基斯坦员工进行正常沟通。 有一定学历，需要基本文化水平（不接受完全没有文化基础的人员）。 岗位职责： 负责印度精聊团队的日常管理与培训。 指导团队工作，提高团队整体业绩。 与本地员工进行沟通协调，保证团队正常运作。 @dididiwo @nidedidi 订阅：- @qiuzhi1188
❤5👏1🔥1
求职： 巴基斯坦内 湖南，男，以前做过风控，主流游戏玩法，套利都理解 33 岁 @ying1827 订阅： @qiuzhi1188
❤4🔥1
底薪：10000 RMB 提成：10% 起，最高 20% 工作地点：巴基斯坦 伊斯兰堡 联系方式： @dididiwo @nidedidi 订阅：- @qiuzhi1188
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @qiuzhi1188. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,192,346 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qiuzhi1188 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中东求职招聘|法弟” (@qiuzhi1188), 64 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiuzhi1188.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.