Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 精彩数据号(官方频道)

Channel

精彩数据号(官方频道)

@qi717nb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

741subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002880009569
TypeChannel
Username@qi717nb
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qi717nb

Growth

7417597508 August 2026 — 759 subscribers8 August 2026 — 759 subscribers15 August 2026 — 752 subscribers22 August 2026 — 743 subscribers30 August 2026 — 741 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 738–762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:35741-2
22 Aug 2026, 15:03743-9
15 Aug 2026, 03:04752-7
8 Aug 2026, 07:30759no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:20759first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
🌚125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Nov 2025, 11:28 UTC301 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZCLF666Video

无线授权使用教程 太多小学生不会使用我们家的无线授权数据号了 今天给大家出个详细教程 在学不会坐牢吧 嘎嘎质量 全网最低价 授权地址http://103.99.106.48:8081/index.html

29 Nov 2025, 11:26 UTC310 viewsread 8 August 2026

授权网站以恢复 可以正常授权 还是授权不了的来找我补号

29 Nov 2025, 09:50 UTC317 viewsread 8 August 2026

授权不了是因为授权网站的问题 等授权网站好了就可以授权了 售后全部是授权不了的反馈 我不敢看太多了

29 Nov 2025, 05:36 UTC304 viewsread 8 August 2026

无限授权网站有bug 授权不了 等待修复 修复好了会通知 客服家里死人了有点事晚点回复大家信息

26 Nov 2025, 19:22 UTC222 viewsread 8 August 2026

授权号 全网最低价 高等级均补货👍 如此前购买退游号的可以来找我用授权号补售后 如果希望要退游号 可耐心等待 感谢各位支持❤️

26 Nov 2025, 16:27 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

兄弟们这咋办啊没号售后了😭只能等有库存在补了、售后暂时不看、别说我跑路不回信息啊就是没库存了

🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @qi717nb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 614,094 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“精彩数据号(官方频道)” (@qi717nb), 741 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qi717nb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.