Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ꑭ Потікша Фляга ꑭ

Channel

ꑭ Потікша Фляга ꑭ

@qch1p

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

279subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787808813
TypeChannel
Username@qch1p
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qch1p

Growth

27928128028 August 2026 — 281 subscribers28 August 2026 — 281 subscribers5 September 2026 — 279 subscribers28 August 20265 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 279–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:38279-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:23281no change
28 Aug 2026, 08:15281first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

247 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8835.6%
7229.1%
😁3715.0%
💯124.86%
🤯124.86%
😢114.45%
😭52.02%
😎41.62%
👾20.81%
🕊10.405%
🤔10.405%
🤣10.405%
🤨10.405%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC307 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Цей канал я більше вести не буду. За «офіційний» можна рахувати цей https://t.me/potikshaflyaga

😢101

Signed ПФ

6 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC381 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @potikshaflyagaPhoto

Воно?

🔥312

Signed ПФ

4 Jul 2026, 03:14 UTC372 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Прикольно фінтанули.

2🤔1😢1

Signed ПФ

3 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC339 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Якась дивна повернутість у розробників дронів на «цікаві» назви😂 Є-бали - хіханьки-хаханьки P1-sun - окей, прикол Тепер peace duck і yell duck. З одного боку це жарти пʼятикласників. З іншого - уявіть собі, що весь світ буде воювати українськими пісюнами і єлдаками😂

😁27🤣1

Signed ПФ

30 Jun 2026, 17:49 UTC377 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

З божой допомогою😮‍💨

1

Signed ПФ

30 Jun 2026, 09:28 UTC367 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Не люблю коли люди починають нити про справедливість. На війні її не існує. Ось приклад: Є дві суміжні позиції, на одній сидять тіпи, які тримаються зеленки, коли переміщуються, зупиняються/ховаються, коли чують дрон, не маячить без необхідності. На другій тіпи просто нехтують усіма можливими правилами безпеки. В результаті перші сидять спокійно, а інших кріплять. Одні собі тішаться своєю професійною роботою, про яку

10

Signed ПФ

25 Jun 2026, 21:32 UTC337 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @potikshaflyaga

Можна слухати🫡 https://ffm.to/pfm_yak_zavjdu

2

Signed ПФ

24 Jun 2026, 20:12 UTC411 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Зараз оце знову несеться переможна перемога, бо на рашку майже кожного дня летять дрони і ми бачимо кадри палаючих нпз, виробництв і так далі. Вже бачу чергову хвилю вкраїнчиків, що попустили ремені і це чергова помилка. Скільки разів треба наступити на граблі, щоб засвоїти, що війна так просто не скінчиться. Це початок камбеку, якщо хочете, але точно не перемога. Скільки по нам прилітало і ми не здались. Чому думаю

🔥1710

Signed ПФ

24 Jun 2026, 18:14 UTC314 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZ-Mz6bq7v5/?igsh=Zm14bW54czZ5M2Vm Мама, я в тєлєку😂

11

Signed ПФ

17 Jun 2026, 00:49 UTC348 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @potikshaflyagaPhoto

Загальна кількість прослуховувань сягнула 2 мульта🎉 Завжди робив щиро, як відчуваю і не гнався з цифрами, але приємно, що людям відгукується. Коли щось роблю довгий період освідомлено і цілеспрямовано, то завжди зʼявляються певні амбіції. В даному випадку це намагання покращити звук, зведення, не зловживати з римами на дієслова і квадратами, щоб було приємніше слухати. Буду працювати і далі, війна йде, політики довбо

16🔥7😁1

Signed ПФ

10 Jun 2026, 23:25 UTC434 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ох і єбане😈

🤯12🔥6

Signed ПФ

3 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC516 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Нравиця дуже мені в армії 😂

17😭5😎4👾2🕊1

Signed ПФ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qch1p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

тремба
@thetremba · 44,309
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ꑭ Потікша Фляга ꑭ” (@qch1p), 279 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qch1p.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.