Готовая совулечка для Ситх она такая слэйная епттттт🫦 Спасибо за звёздочки любимие 🥹
❤28🍓8custom 54494693485718057904
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis

Channel
@qawserzt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
246subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001541272393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qawserzt |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qawserzt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 246 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 245 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
679 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 267 | 39.3% | |
| custom 5418153603850328469 | 185 | 27.2% | |
| 🍓 | 98 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5449469348571805790 | 52 | 7.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 4.12% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 2.80% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 2.65% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.18% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.589% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 679reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qawserzt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 February 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Готовая совулечка для Ситх она такая слэйная епттттт🫦 Спасибо за звёздочки любимие 🥹
❤28🍓8custom 54494693485718057904
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
работаю над заказиками йоууу Приехал в Москву, до этого досрочно сдал экзамены, чтобы уехать со спокойной душой, и отлично полежал недельку дома после операции. Наконец-то можно отдыхать и рисовать🥹 СПАСИБО ЗА ЗВЕЗДОЧКИ😭🌟
❤24custom 54181536038503284699🍓8
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
❌❌➖❌➖➖➖➖ ❌➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 Нежнейшие бебисы для @Bloodycornf4ower заказанные Мирой<3
❤27custom 544946934857180579012custom 54181536038503284698
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
Мой любимейший Фаязаль💋
❤4
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
Трейд с Каузером !!:3 Невероятно кайфанула пока рисовала А КАКУЮ ИМБУ ВЗАМЕН ПОЛУЧИЛА…
❤24
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
трейд с крутейшей Джаспет !!!🥺🥺 жоска к ней заглядывайте вы видели какие шедевры она рисует??? НУ ПОСМОТРИТЕ ЧТО ЗА ГУД БОЙ я бы его чухал и чухал и чухал и чухал и чух...
💘19🔥10custom 54181536038503284696❤2❤🔥1
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
Я влюбился, пока рисовал, очень красивый мужчинка🥺 В коммах чибибка гифт ему же✏ Очень люблю формат халф с фоном, хочу в ближайшие пару недель взять слотик-два хехе ➡️Арт за перса🤍 На подходе ещё чибики!! Перезалив потому что тг дал ёбу и отключил комментарии
custom 541815360385032846932custom 544946934857180579015🍓10❤4
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
🥽🥽🥽 🥽🥽 🥽🥽 неакт<3 Только антро! Нач– 2к Мин– Авто– При ставки до 5к будет скетч с лёгким рендером, после 5к– фуллрендер Дд две недели Конец аукциона через 48 часов ппс или досрочно Оплата тбанк, бронь неделя, максимум 2
custom 541815360385032846914❤9🍓2
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
❌⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ещё один чибосик, но уже моему малышу Фаязалю💭💭 очень доволен результатом, хоть и, мягко говоря, я устал возиться с его детальками💭
❤34custom 541815360385032846913🍓8
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
В перерыве между 🥯🥯 коммишками сделал 🥯🥯 артик сыночке Хекарро 🥹 Заодно сделал ючик, он будет в коммах, увед по 🥹ссылке
🍓18❤13custom 54181536038503284698
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
❌❌❌❌🥀🥀🥀🥀 ❌❌❌Кастом для @GrFsk Очень красивый молодой человечек, долго с ним работал, но зато какой вышел Разбираюсь с долгами, завтра будет прям лютый завозище...🥺
custom 541815360385032846917custom 54494693485718057908❤6🍌1
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
Коммишка<3
custom 541815360385032846927❤10🍓6❤🔥2🍌1custom 54494693485718057901
Signed C A U S E R (radiculitis) Jasper Mantis
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @qawserzt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,096,014 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qawserzt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Q A W S E R Z T 18+” (@qawserzt), 246 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qawserzt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.