Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قانونجي

Channel

قانونجي

@qanonchi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,531subscribers

+306 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827531053
TypeChannel
Username@qanonchi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qanonchi

Growth

28,22528,53128,37812 August 2026 — 28,225 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,246 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,257 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,265 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,273 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,287 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,340 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,363 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,380 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,419 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,424 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,436 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,451 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,458 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,466 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,489 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,496 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,512 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,514 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,531 subscribers12 August 20265 September 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net +306. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,179–28,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 15:2128,531+17
3 Sept 2026, 18:0228,514+2
2 Sept 2026, 13:4828,512+16
1 Sept 2026, 14:3528,496+7
31 Aug 2026, 15:0828,489+23
30 Aug 2026, 13:1128,466+8
29 Aug 2026, 11:0828,458+7
28 Aug 2026, 12:5828,451+15
27 Aug 2026, 10:1128,436+14
26 Aug 2026, 08:5528,422-2
25 Aug 2026, 09:2228,424+5
24 Aug 2026, 12:2828,419+39
22 Aug 2026, 21:3728,380+17
21 Aug 2026, 14:4928,363+23
20 Aug 2026, 10:1328,340+53
19 Aug 2026, 12:3528,287+14
18 Aug 2026, 14:4328,273+8
17 Aug 2026, 12:0528,265+8
16 Aug 2026, 03:3528,257+11
14 Aug 2026, 17:0728,246first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.35%
avg views ÷ 28,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.744%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held70 (1 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total152,479
Reactions total1,134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,358 reactions across 70 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67549.7%
👍53139.1%
😱664.86%
👏342.50%
🤔251.84%
👎181.33%
👌70.515%
🎉10.074%
🙏10.074%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,358 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 01:56 UTC429 views1 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

لان المحضون توليد ٢٠٢٠/٤/٤ قد بلغ السابعة من عمره بتاريخ(( دفع الرسم عن الدعوى)) في ٢٠٢٦/٥/٧ بإكماله سن السادسة ودخوله سن السابعة وحيث ان المادة (٨١) من مدونة الأحكام الشرعية أشترطت #بلوغ السابعة وليس #اكمالها مما كان يقتضي بالمحكمة إجابة دعوى المدعي / المميز بشأن ولده المذكور

👍1

3 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTC≈1,680 views14 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

إن المدعية مطلقة أثناء فترة حملها لطفلها من المدعى عليه، وعليه يكون المدعى عليه ملزمًا #بتسديد جميع ما أنفقته المدعية من مبالغ تتعلق بالحمل والولادة

👍104

3 Sept 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,640 views10 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

ان الحضانة من المسائل المتجددة وفقاً لمصلحة المحضون ولا يسري سبق الفصل في الموضوع طبقاً لأحكام المادة (١٠٥ إثبات) كما ان البنت ( تولد ٢٠١٤ ) لم تكمل الثامنة عشر من عمرها ولم يتحقق رشدها لعدم بلوغها السن المذكورة ولا عبرة باختيارها وبحسب ما استقر عليه قضاء هذه المحكمة بقرارها بالعدد ٩٣/الهيئة الموسعة المدنية/٢٠٢٦ في ٢٠٢٦/٣/٣١ ولبلوغها سن السابعة مما كان يقتضي بالمحكمة إجابة دعوى والدها المدعي/المميز استناداً لأحكام ال

👍81👎1

2 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,130 views14 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

ان كون المميز منتسب في((وزارة الدفاع)) وان دوامه يتطلب المبيت خارج المنزل لا يترتب عليه انه قد فقد شروط الحضانة طالما ان زوجته قد أبدت استعدادها لرعاية المحضونين والاهتمام بشؤونهما خلال فترة غيابه عن المنزل ، وإذ ان محكمة الموضوع قد خالفَت وجهة النظر المتقدمة مما اخل بصحة حكمها لذا قرر نقضه وإعادة الدعوى الى محكمتها لاتباع ما تقدم

11👍3

1 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC≈2,350 views18 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

قرار مهم: رُدَّت دعوى الأب بإسقاط الحضانة عن الأم؛ لكون الأب المدعي يسكن في دار شقيقته المتزوجة وليس في دار مستقلة، وبالتالي فإن استقرار المحضونين في السكن الذي يحقق الاستقرار النفسي لهم غير متحقق في دعوى المميِّز. بالتالي تكون دعواه واجبة الرد للسبب المذكور أعلاه

15👍3

1 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,970 views8 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

إلغاء حق اصطحاب المحضونين، وبقاء حق المشاهدة فقط للأب، بسبب أن المدعى عليه أضر بالمحضونين ضررًا واضحًا، كونه يقوم "بالتعنيف الذي يتجاوز حدود التأديب"

👍52👎1

1 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,630 views8 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

قرار مهم بخصوص دعوى ترك النشوز: لأن المدعي غير متعسف عند طلبه إلزام المدعى عليها (الزوجة) بترك النشوز وأداء الحقوق الزوجية؛ كونه هيأ دارًا صالحة للسكن وتحتوي على أثاث زوجي غير متنازع عليه. أما مسألة وجود خلافات بين المدعى عليها وشخص آخر من أقارب المدعي، تبعد داره عن الدار المهيأة مئتي متر، فإن ذلك لا يعتبر سببًا لرد الدعوى، وبذلك يكون لدعوى المدعي سند من الشرع والقانون. وحيث إن المحكمة قضت برد الدعوى خلافًا لوجهة الن

6👍2

1 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,770 views9 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

الكفيل الضامن عن المدين لا يُشترط أن يكون موظفًا حصرًا. والعبرة بالمقدرة المالية؛ إذ أجاز القانون تقديم كفيل ضامن دون تقييده بصفة وظيفية، على أن يتحقق المنفذ العدل من المقدرة المالية للكفيل وأمواله قبل قبول الكفالة، استنادًا إلى أحكام المادة (32/ثانيًا) من قانون التنفيذ والمادة (1008) من القانون المدني

👍81

1 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,810 views9 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

الحكم بالإعدام شنقًا حتى الموت؛ لكفاية الأدلة المتحصلة عن الجريمة، قيام المتهم بقتل زوجته ووالده بواسطة(( سكين ))أخذها من الثلاجة، بعدة طعنات في منطقة الرقبة وأماكن متفرقة من جسمها عندما كانت نائمة في دارها؛ لحصول الشك لديه بممارسة((السحر والشعوذة) ووجود علاقات((مشبوهة))لها مع أشخاص غير والده

👍81

31 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈2,220 views16 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

لأن تطبيق احكام المادة (٩٣) من قانون رعاية القاصرين رقم ٧٨ لسنة ١٩٨٠ المعدل يكون على المفقود وهو من ثبت فقدانه بموجب حجة صادرة من محكمة الأحوال الشخصية المختصة او اعلن عن فقدانه بقرار من وزير الدفاع او وزير الداخلية ان كان من افراد القوات المسلحة بموجب احكام المادة (٨٧) من القانون المذكور وذلك لا ينطبق على ابن المدعية فتكون دعواها بالمطالبة بوفاته وفق احكام المادة (٩٣) من قانون رعاية القاصرين واجبة الرد

👍124

31 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,300 views13 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

قرار مهم: رُدَّت دعوى الأب بإسقاط الحضانة عن الأم؛ لكون الأب المدعي يسكن في دار شقيقته المتزوجة وليس في دار مستقلة، وبالتالي فإن استقرار المحضونين في السكن الذي يحقق الاستقرار النفسي لهم غير متحقق في دعوى المميِّز. بالتالي تكون دعواه واجبة الرد للسبب المذكور أعلاه

9👍4

31 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈2,120 views11 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

إلغاء حق اصطحاب المحضونين، وبقاء حق المشاهدة فقط للأب، بسبب أن المدعى عليه أضر بالمحضونين ضررًا واضحًا، كونه يقوم "بالتعنيف الذي يتجاوز حدود التأديب"

7👍3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @qanonchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة الفكر القانوني العراقي
@iraqilegal2018 · 38,381
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قانونجي” (@qanonchi), 28,531 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qanonchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.