Channel
@dlel7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,460subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001612723060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dlel7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dlel7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 1,460 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 1,462 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:47 | 1,462 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
المسحوب علية في السفتجة يجب إن يكون شخصا
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
Signed Hussein Mohammed
اشترط قانون ذكر اسم المسحوب علية كبيان الزامي سؤالي هل حدد القانون موضع معين في الورقة لكتابة اسم المسحوب علية
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
ماهو الحكم إذا كان القانون الاجنبي ينص على عمر اقل من الثامنة عشر لاكتساب الاهلية التجارية ووقع الاجنبي حوالة تجارية في العراق هل يستطيع ان يدفع ببطلان الورقة لان القانون العراقي يقر سن اكبر
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
الحكم ببطلان الورقة التجارية لانعدام الاهلية هل يستوجب أثبات الضرر
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
لفاقد الاهليه او من يمثلة قانونا التمسك بالبطلان ضد كل شخص حتى وأن كان هذا الشخص حسن النيه بين صحة العبارة
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
هناك شروط معينه يجيب إن تتوافر لثبوت حالة النيابة الكاذبة او النيابة المتجاوزة
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
إذا كتب مبلغ الحوالة بالحروف والأرقام معا فالعبره عند الاختلاف
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
من البيانات الاختيارية في الحوالة التجارية
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
العوض في الورقة التجارية ممكن ان يكون
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
سؤال هل يجوز ان يأمر الساحب بأن يتم دفع مبلغ الحوالة بحدود القدرة والاستطاعة
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
الورقة التجارية محرر شكلي يكون قابل للتداول
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
يشترط في المحل أن يكون مبلغ من النقود
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Hussein Mohammed
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dlel7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
المسحوب علية في السفتجة يجب إن يكون شخصا
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اشترط قانون ذكر اسم المسحوب علية كبيان الزامي سؤالي هل حدد القانون موضع معين في الورقة لكتابة اسم المسحوب علية
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ماهو الحكم إذا كان القانون الاجنبي ينص على عمر اقل من الثامنة عشر لاكتساب الاهلية التجارية ووقع الاجنبي حوالة تجارية في العراق هل يستطيع ان يدفع ببطلان الورقة لان القانون العراقي يقر سن اكبر
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الحكم ببطلان الورقة التجارية لانعدام الاهلية هل يستوجب أثبات الضرر
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
لفاقد الاهليه او من يمثلة قانونا التمسك بالبطلان ضد كل شخص حتى وأن كان هذا الشخص حسن النيه بين صحة العبارة
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هناك شروط معينه يجيب إن تتوافر لثبوت حالة النيابة الكاذبة او النيابة المتجاوزة
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 10 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سوال قانوني ؟؟” (@dlel7), 1,460 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dlel7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.