Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сповідь тестувальника

Channel

Сповідь тестувальника

@qa_confession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

592subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002644470932
TypeChannel
Username@qa_confession
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qa_confession

Growth

5926 Aug 2026, 21:03 — 592 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 592 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:037 Aug 2026, 21:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 21:02592no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:03592first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.4%
avg views ÷ 592 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,216
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6429.2%
👍5424.7%
😁3616.4%
💯219.59%
🔥156.85%
👏52.28%
😢52.28%
🙏52.28%
🤔52.28%
👀41.83%
🐳10.457%
😐10.457%
🤗10.457%
🤝10.457%
🤯10.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qa_confession. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC201 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁161

Signed Олекса Мащиць

26 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC357 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привіт, мій щоденнику... Зазвичай це я, той, хто каже, що треба піти почитати та дізнатися перед тим, як скаржитися. Це я про софт. Та випадки, коли він нього очікують чогось просто тому, що ось так хочеться і через те він має саме так і робити. А він не робить й ніколи не робив. Але сам потрапив у ситуацію. Але... Так, я міг піти почитати про те, що Codex тепер інтегрували у ChatGPT. Міг також почитати про те, що

👍83

Signed Олекса Мащиць

24 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC293 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А ви знаєте, що я разом з колегою створив вже 6 випусків подкасту? Якщо вам довподоби дописи тут, то дуже ймовірно, що сподобається й MRG podcast. Він також доволі нетиповий, як на мене. Ми кажемо, що це вдумливий подкаст про технології, софт та тестування. 📱 🎵 📱 Доступний на YouTube (наживо), а також на Spotify та Apple Podcasts. Зазирніть, підписуйтеся, якщо цікаво. Підтримуйте, якщо корисно. ➡️ https://linktr.

12👍4

Signed Олекса Мащиць

18 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC365 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привіт, мій щоденнику... Контекст. контекст... ми так багато знаємо про контекст... у контексті роботи з мовними моделями а також і так мало! Ось свіжий приклад, який потрібно екстраполювати на інші сценарії роботи з LLM. Роблю простий запит у гуглі: - Confluence analog Що може бути простіше, що може бути не так з контекстом цього елементарного запитання? Вбудована модель починає мені казати про аналоги, а також

11👍4

Signed Олекса Мащиць

1 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC402 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А ось реальний випадок з моєї практики на тему сертифікатів. Якось на проєкті ми дискутували з колегою про структуру для організації текст кейсів у тест менеджмент системі. Вічна тема, бо існує декілька підходів і я б не сказав, що є лише один правильний. Наприклад, основою структури можуть бути фічі, а можуть бути розділи в інтерфейсі. Проблема вибору у тому, що розділи є зрозумілими людині, бо вона їх бачить: дома

14😢5🐳1😐1

Signed Олекса Мащиць

1 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC300 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привіт, мій щоденнику... Читаю статтю, де, цитую, "ШІ директор в EPAM Україна", розповідає про сертифікацію від Anthropic. Ставиться до неї позитивно, і вже в назві першими словами є "Знак якості", що сертифікат є саме таким знаком. Це експозиція. А допис лише про один нюанс, який мене зачепив. У статті Вадим зазначає, що на іспиті є питання, де Антропік дає сувору відповідь, від якої не можна відійти, бо це вва

11👍1

Signed Олекса Мащиць

30 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC266 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привіт, мій щоденнику... В топах технологічних новин традиційно — нові версії мовних моделей від гігантів ринку. Новини ж, що у певному сенсі протистоять їм — ігноруються (я певен, що часто півсвідомо, but still). Це новини, на тлі яких багато досвідчених інженерів могли б говорити зараз: "А я казав!" про свої застереження починаючи вже з 2023 року (2022 залишимо на суцільний вау ефект). Так ось. Ford за останні т

👍9

Signed Олекса Мащиць

19 Jun 2026, 08:45 UTC356 views5 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Друзі, дякую за ваші відповіді! 33% це багато чи мало, щоб робити в цьому каналі більше сповіщень про події (що я поки намагався мінімузувати тут)? Поки не знаю, особливо якщо враховувати, що йдеться про мою особисту участь, а не якусь сторонню рекламу. То ж, буду міркувати далі, щоб тут превалював стиль щоденнику. Це, все ж, головне.

🙏5

Signed Олекса Мащиць

18 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC383 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Чули про AI-meetup від Бетельгейзе?

  1. Так64%
  2. Ні36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Олекса Мащиць

18 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC378 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Друзі, прошу допомогти мені з невеличким аналізом. Я тут нічого не писав про прийдешній AI-meetup від Бетельгейзе. Але про нього в інших джерелах було багато. Мені цікаво, чи є серед вас тут ті, до кого не дійшла інформація про цю подію? Бо я або обділив вас цікавим, або напроти — зберіг від спаму. Нижче кину просту голосовалку. Дякую.

👀3

Signed Олекса Мащиць

14 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC518 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Цікаве побачив у мережі. Як відомо, Андрей Карпати з недавніх пір працює в Antropic. Відомо також, що США заборонили використовувати Claude Mythos та Fable не громадянам США. Так ось, наче у Андрея лише грінкарта, а отже він не громадянин США, а отже не може користуватися цими версіями Claude. Над якими від й має працювати в Antropic.

😁15🔥2

Signed Олекса Мащиць

8 Jun 2026, 10:35 UTC638 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Привіт, мій щоденнику... Що таке продуктове мислення у дуже спрощеній формі, але на прикладі. Один конструктор сайтів мав опцію для блоків сторінок: показувати або ні на мобільних пристроях та на десктопі. Дві опції, які можна вмикати незалежно. І ось оновлення. Додали третю опцію — окремо для планшетів. Тепер всі блоки мають цю опцію і вона для всіх них увімкнена. Навіть якщо блок було приховано раніше на мобільни

4👍3

Signed Олекса Мащиць

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qa_confession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTCAnonymous Poll84 voters

Чули про AI-meetup від Бетельгейзе?

  1. Так64%
  2. Ні36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 806,876 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сповідь тестувальника” (@qa_confession), 592 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qa_confession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.