Channel
@qa_ai_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004431301923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qa_ai_news |
| Created | 29 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qa_ai_news |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 120 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 121 | +3 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:57 | 118 | +3 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 115 | +16 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 99 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 97 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 97 | +5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 92 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
61 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 17 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AI ускоряет разработку. Но это не значит, что продукт начинает создаваться быстрее. Microsoft описала интересный вывод из своего перехода к AI-native разработке: рост производительности отдельных разработчиков почти не дал роста производительности команды. Причина - старый процесс разработки. AI может быстро генерировать код, тесты и документацию. Но если требования неоднозначны, он просто быстрее масштабирует эту…
👍4💯4🔥1
Мои бывшие коллеги замутили комьнити Quality Minded. На первой встрече, которая состоится 11 сентября в 17:00 GTM+3 будут разговаривать про то как меняется тестирование, когда код пишет AI. https://www.meetup.com/quality-minded/events/316459037/ #qa #qa_ai_news #quality_minded #ai
❤6👀4
24 августа ATSQA выкатили довольно существенное обновление своего глобальный списка инструментов тестирования и автоматизации В апдейте явно виден новый всплеск AI‑ориентированных решений для качества. В базе у них уже 642 инструмента в 25 категориях, включая отдельную секцию AI‑assisted testing, а свежий апдейт принес сразу 17 JSON‑утилит - от генерации и форматирования до валидации, сравнения и мокирования данных,…
🔥6
Posted without readable text
🤔6🤣1
Posted without readable text
👀3🤔1
Posted without readable text
❤5💯5🔥1
Posted without readable text
💯3🤔2
Posted without readable text
👀2🤔2
Кажется чем дальше тем больше важна роль QA — не тестировщика, а именно инженера, который понимает архитектуру, умеет процесс деливери засетапить, и спеки написать или проанализировать (хоть сам, хоть с помощью AI - но имхо сам лучше), код может быть полностью написан AI (пофигу на самом деле - ведь черный ящик он и есть черный ящик), навесить Quality Gates везде где это необходимо, захеджировать риски, сделать ревью…
💯5
QA & AI pinned «Резервное место для первого прикрепленного сообщения, в котором будут ссылки и теги.»
Резервное место для первого прикрепленного сообщения, в котором будут ссылки и теги.
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @qa_ai_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QA & AI” (@qa_ai_news), 120 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qa_ai_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.