👋👋👋

Channel
❤️一站查找全国城市外围女❤️
@q08880
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,455subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001395134625 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @q08880 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/q08880 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 6,455 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 6,457 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 6,452 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 6,462 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 6,467 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 6,473 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 6,468 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 6,467 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.68%
- avg views ÷ 6,455 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 108
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.33%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,276 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
👋👋👋
🫰🫰🫰
👋👋👋
💖💖💖
😍😍😍
👋👋👋
👋👋👋
🫰🫰🫰
👋👋👋
⬆⬆⬆
👋👋👋
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @q08880. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 5,451 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@H08880 · 1513 posts江西南昌云南昆明全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@JX08880 · 1733 posts八字命理专题
@M08880 · 1563 posts上海魔都全区模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@sh08880 · 1,4883 posts山西太原贵州贵阳遵义模特空姐学生高端外围专题号
@YY08880 · 1543 posts北京上海广州深圳一线外围女资源联系方式公布
@b08880 · 2,3052 posts北京首都学生模特空姐中高端资源外围专题号
@bt08880 · 7932 posts重庆全区模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@CC08880 · 3782 posts四川成都全区中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@cq08880 · 1,2452 posts东北黑龙江吉林辽宁高端外围专题号
@DB08880 · 2712 posts全国二线各大城市外围女资源联系方式公布
@f08880 · 2,3452 posts福建厦门福州泉州甘肃兰州宁夏银川中高端外围专题
@FJ08880 · 4192 posts广东东莞佛山珠海中山中高端外围专题号
@gd08880 · 1,0042 posts广州全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@gz08880 · 1,7662 posts全国外围实拍验证视频模特学生空姐中高端专题号
@HH08880 · 7002 posts全国视频信息资源合集模特学生空姐高端外围专题号
@HK08880 · 4152 posts湖南长沙全区中高端模特空姐学生外围专题号
@HN08880 · 2562 posts江苏南京苏州常州南通扬州中高端外围专题号
@Js08880 · 5132 posts广西南宁桂林柳州中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@km08880 · 5742 posts陕西西安中高端模特外围专题号
@NN08880 · 1912 posts山东济南青岛烟台模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@SD08880 · 3422 posts深圳全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@sz08880 · 2,1312 posts湖北武汉中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@wh08880 · 8012 posts河南郑州洛阳开封中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@xa08880 · 8252 posts全国城市中高端资源汇总链接
@zz08880 · 3,5762 posts蘑菇头的反馈对话截图红榜黑榜模特空姐学生外围专题号
@XJ08880 · 1361 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️一站查找全国城市外围女❤️” (@q08880), 6,455 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/q08880.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.