😍😍😍

Channel
北京上海广州深圳一线外围女资源联系方式公布
@b08880
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,305subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001347798195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @b08880 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/b08880 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 2,305 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 2,307 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 2,310 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 2,308 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 2,314 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 2,321 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 2,318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 2,318 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.06%
- avg views ÷ 2,305 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24.5
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 417 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
👋👋👋
👋👋👋
👋👋👋
👋👋👋
😍😍😍
👋👋👋
💗💗💗
👋👋👋
⬆⬆⬆
👋👋👋
👋👋👋
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @b08880. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 11,065 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bt08880 · 7931 post重庆全区模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@CC08880 · 3781 post四川成都全区中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@cq08880 · 1,2451 post东北黑龙江吉林辽宁高端外围专题号
@DB08880 · 2711 post全国二线各大城市外围女资源联系方式公布
@f08880 · 2,3511 post福建厦门福州泉州甘肃兰州宁夏银川中高端外围专题
@FJ08880 · 4191 post广东东莞佛山珠海中山中高端外围专题号
@gd08880 · 1,0041 post广州全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@gz08880 · 1,7661 post海南三亚海口全区中高端模特空姐学生外围专题号
@H08880 · 1511 post全国外围实拍验证视频模特学生空姐中高端专题号
@HH08880 · 7001 post全国视频信息资源合集模特学生空姐高端外围专题号
@HK08880 · 4151 post湖南长沙全区中高端模特空姐学生外围专题号
@HN08880 · 2561 post江苏南京苏州常州南通扬州中高端外围专题号
@Js08880 · 5131 post江西南昌云南昆明全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@JX08880 · 1731 post广西南宁桂林柳州中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@km08880 · 5741 post陕西西安中高端模特外围专题号
@NN08880 · 1911 post❤️一站查找全国城市外围女❤️
@q08880 · 6,4551 post山东济南青岛烟台模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@SD08880 · 3421 post上海魔都全区模特学生空姐中高端外围专题号
@sh08880 · 1,4881 post深圳全区模特空姐学生外围专题号
@sz08880 · 2,1311 post湖北武汉中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@wh08880 · 8011 post河南郑州洛阳开封中高端模特学生空姐外围专题号
@xa08880 · 8251 post蘑菇头的反馈对话截图红榜黑榜模特空姐学生外围专题号
@XJ08880 · 1361 post山西太原贵州贵阳遵义模特空姐学生高端外围专题号
@YY08880 · 1541 post全国城市中高端资源汇总链接
@zz08880 · 3,5761 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京上海广州深圳一线外围女资源联系方式公布” (@b08880), 2,305 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b08880.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.