Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⫍ 𝗣𝖤𝖮𝖯𝖫𝖤 ፞ ፞ 𝙼. ©

@pzinerp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004354754758
TypeChannel
Username@pzinerp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pzinerp

Growth

3510 Aug 2026, 21:15 — 35 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:31 — 35 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:1510 Aug 2026, 23:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:3135no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:1535first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
207.3%
avg views ÷ 35 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total798
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Videos
1
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC94 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📰𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺📰𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 📰 𝖾𝗆 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲.𝖼𝗈𝗆 📰 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 📰𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂. 📰 📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰 📰𝗢𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗮 𝗥𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗼 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗎́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈. 📰 📰𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗮𝗿𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗼📰𝗿𝗼𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗼𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 📰𝖬𝗎𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺📰𝖮𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈📰𝖥𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅

4 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC97 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📰 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 📰 𝖠𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲.𝖼𝗈𝗆 📰𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌📰 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 📰𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗲 𝗔𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺. 📰 📰𝖦𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖠𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗌📰𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺📰𝖣𝖥𝖧📰𝖤𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾 . 📰𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗮𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗺𝘀📰𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗵𝗾

4 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC93 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📰𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 📰 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 📰 𝖺𝗈 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲.𝖼𝗈𝗆 📰 𝖾𝗆 𝟬𝟰 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨 📰𝖫𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌. 📰 📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰 📰 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 '𝖱𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗒 𝗈𝗋 𝖭𝗈𝗍 𝟤: 𝖧𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖨 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾', 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗧𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋. 📰 𝖤𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 📰 📰𝘁𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿𝘀𝘄𝗶𝗳𝘁📰𝘁𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 📰𝘁𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀📰𝘇𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻 . 📰𝖳𝖺𝗒𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖲𝗐𝗂𝖿𝗍📰𝖢𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗆𝖺📰𝖤𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾

4 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC74 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📰 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 📰 𝖠𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 📰𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾. 📰𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌. 📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰 📰 𝗘𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝗯𝗲𝘁𝗵 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗂́𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖳𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺. 📰📰📰 📰𝖯𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗓𝗂📰𝖤𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗍𝗁 📰𝖭𝖾𝗐𝗌 📰𝖤𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾📰𝖥𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖮𝗇𝖾 📰𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝗯𝗲𝘁𝗵𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻 📰𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗀𝖾𝖽 .

3 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC117 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📰𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲.𝖼𝗈𝗆 📰 𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗮 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 📰 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾. 📰 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 📰 📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰📰 📰 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗮𝘀 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝟤𝟣𝗁, 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 📰𝖩𝟧📰𝖢𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖻𝖺𝖼𝗄📰𝖩𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗌📰𝖬𝗎𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 📰𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮📰𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pzinerp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 68,961 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⫍ 𝗣𝖤𝖮𝖯𝖫𝖤 ፞ ፞ 𝙼. ©” (@pzinerp), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pzinerp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.