Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

九九家 🍧萌新須知喝茶規則

@pz3956

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

262subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002467125884
TypeChannel
Username@pz3956
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pz3956

Growth

247262254.57 August 2026 — 248 subscribers8 August 2026 — 247 subscribers8 August 2026 — 247 subscribers14 August 2026 — 262 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 245–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:33262+15
8 Aug 2026, 09:34247no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:56247-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:07248first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.5%
avg views ÷ 262 subscribers
Avg views / post
397
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held18 (20 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,191
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC434 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyfc6699Photo

為什麼第一次只能約飯店?熟了才能去家裡? 九九來幫大家解答! 經常有哥私訊問我: 「九九,為什麼第一次約一定要在飯店或汽旅?不能直接去我家嗎?」 其實不是我們不願意去,這真的是為了保護哥 也保護妹妹的貼心規定啦! ✨第一次約飯店,大家最安心 安全第一: 第一次見面大家都還不熟悉,飯店或汽旅有櫃檯、有監視器,對妹妹來說是個安全的環境;對哥來說,也不用擔心自家住址曝光,大家見面都沒有負擔! 省時省力: 哥不用特地花時間整理房間,直接去飯店放鬆享受就好~ ✨ 熟客解鎖住家,才是專屬福利 等我們約過一兩次 知道哥超有禮貌 人又超好,信任感直接拉滿! 這時候解鎖「住家服務」 哥可以在自己最舒服的房間放鬆 妹妹去得也放心~ 這就是只留給「自己人」的貼心服務啦! 第一次先在外面「浪漫約會」 等熟了再帶回家~這樣大家都放心 體驗才會最好嘛!😉 想放鬆了嗎?快私訊我安排今晚的精選妹妹吧! 🤍・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🤍

30 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC453 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

為什麼九九會跟哥哥要電話?📞 很多哥哥第一次都會問: 「不是用 LINE 或 Telegram 就好了嗎?」 其實留電話只有三個原因: ① 緊急聯絡 如果 LINE、Telegram 當機 或妹妹到了聯絡不上你 電話可以第一時間通知 避免彼此錯過 ② 建立 VIP 紀錄 方便幫你記錄優惠 消費紀錄與喜歡的類型 下次預約更快速,也能享有熟客福利 ③ 保障彼此權益 九九以前也遇過客人預約後突然失聯 妹妹空出時間卻白跑一趟 沒有電話就完全聯絡不到人 最後只能由九九承擔損失 也會影響妹妹之後願不願意配合預約 九九完全理解大家重視隱私,我也一樣 所以客人的資料只會用於預約聯絡 不會做其他用途,更不會打電話騷擾 其實就跟訂旅館、訂飯店一樣 都會留下聯絡電話作為預約確認 而九九一直堅持 見到妹妹才現金付款 不需先匯款、不買點數,保障大家的安全 希望大家互相理解、互相信任,謝謝每一位支持九九的哥哥❤️ 🤍・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧

3 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC361 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyfc6699Photo

🚨【重要提醒|台灣外送茶防詐騙公告】🚨 台灣外送茶,一律見面現金消費。 台灣外送茶,一律見面現金消費。 台灣外送茶,一律見面現金消費。 凡是要求: ❌ 先匯款 ❌ 收 USDT(U) ❌ 收虛擬貨幣 ❌ 要求先付訂金、保證金、認證金、開通費 請直接提高警覺! 最近市面上許多冒用茶莊名義的詐騙,都是利用「先付款」的方式騙錢。一旦轉帳或轉 U,對方往往直接失聯,錢也很難追回。 📢請各位同仁與客人務必記住: ✅ 正常流程就是「見面確認,人到付款,現金交易」。 ✅ 不要相信任何要求先付款才能安排妹妹的說法。 ✅ 保護自己的荷包,不要讓詐騙有機可乘。 ⚠️ 謹防假冒、謹防詐騙、謹慎交易! 保護好自己的荷包,比什麼都重要。 正規渠道: 🤍・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🤍 ⭐️ Telegram: @tnt699 💗 Gleezy:fc6699 ⭐️ line:52fc2

30 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC295 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

很多人都是這樣 一聽到價格,轉身就走 開始到處比價、找更便宜的 結果呢? 不是照片與本人落差太大 就是遇到各種套路、先付費、甚至直接被騙 繞了一大圈,最後還是回來找我 所以我一直想告訴大家一句話: 不怕你嫌貴,只怕你為了便宜付出更大的代價 市場上永遠有人比我便宜 但真正值得的,從來不是最低的價格,而是穩定的品質 真實的資源,以及安心的服務 價格可以比較 但體驗、效率與保障,往往只有真正遇過的人才知道差別 如果你在乎的是一次愉快、安心、不踩雷的體驗 那就請尊重專業,也尊重它應有的價值 便宜,不一定省錢;選對,才是真的划算💕

1

21 Jun 2026, 07:52 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyfc6699Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 約妹格式如上⭐ 🤍・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🤍 ⭐️ Telegram: @tnt699 💗 Gleezy:fc6699 ⭐️ line:52fc2

4 Jun 2026, 13:16 UTC367 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

九九家專屬VIP制度: https://blog.udn.com/yang123.../189682973 (點擊有詳細內容) 🤍・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🤍 ⭐️ Telegram: @tnt699 💗 Gleezy:fc6699 ⭐️ line:52fc2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pz3956. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“九九家 🍧萌新須知喝茶規則” (@pz3956), 262 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pz3956.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.