Channel
@pyala123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
362subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001767581956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pyala123 |
| Description | эта сладкая жизнь, как клубника в шоколаде |
| Created | 28 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pyala123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 362 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 362 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (19 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,518 |
| Reactions total | 222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
222 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 61.3% | |
| custom 5463391863018915730 | 15 | 6.76% | |
| 🍓 | 14 | 6.31% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 6.31% | |
| custom 5220026667996571951 | 13 | 5.86% | |
| custom 5465172346006439295 | 12 | 5.41% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 4.95% | |
| custom 5219790534989606875 | 6 | 2.70% | |
| custom 5249391866205468544 | 1 | 0.45% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
fire cover fest 🤩 &TEAM “Big suki” (николас) 🪽 Hearts2Hearts “Focus” (иан) я очень скучала по фаеру, там такие крутые номера были, это надо было видеть💔💔
❤13custom 54651723460064392958💘3
😝 завтра выступаем на фаер кавер фесте в каааааааззаааани 1 блок 🌟 [13:50] SADASS - &TEAM - Big Suki [лиля] —————————————————————— 3 блок 🌟 [17:51] Never Mind - TripleS - Girls Never Die [элина] ✨ [19:02] 4tune - FOCUS - Hearts2Hearts [we] до встречи завтра в ДК. Ленина!!!
❤18custom 54651723460064392953custom 54633918630189157302
фокус почти все... МЫ СЧАСТЛИВЫ
custom 546339186301891573012❤6custom 52200266679965719513
ТАКОЕ ПРОПУСКАТЬ ТОЧНО НЕЛЬЗЯ ‼️ ЖДЕМ ВСЕХ И КАЖДОГО НА КАСТИНГ В НАШИ K POP ПРО КОМАНДЫ SWAGA CREW и GG CREW 🌟 14 АВГУСТА 15:00 🕒 Кастинг пройдет в формате мастер класса от 2 топовых педагогов нашего города- Лили 😎и Амины 😎 ВАЖНО ☝🏻 КАСТИНГ ПРОХОДИТ НА БЕСПЛАТНОЙ ОСНОВЕ 😉 ДЕРЗАЙТЕ РЕБЯТКИ- это хорошая возможность попасть в самую сильную команду Челнов💪🏻
💋8❤4
Video, posted without a caption
❤8💋3
пока что только до что получится в итоге, глянем на фаере, дай бог 😛
🍓11❤3
ой пофиг смотрите так короче
❤12💘3
💍🌸🐱 moonstruck я в депрессии с вот таким лицом 😐😐
❤14💘5
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
🖇️🩶🩶🩶 🖇️🩶🩶🩶🖇️ 📎 затащили с ребятами сегодня первое место в male всех любим, оссобено другу друга, до встречи на фаере огромное спасибо хотим сказать лие и лукасу за этот крутой проект, за участие, за танец, за то, что мы сделали это вместе!
❤14💘3🍓2custom 52200266679965719511
🤩🤩 ####
❤25custom 52200266679965719519custom 52197905349896068756🍓1custom 54633918630189157301custom 54651723460064392951
🩶🖇️🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶 ▫️ LILI - 1 место solo ▫️ 4tune - 2 место male ▫️ Taeyang - 2 место solo ▫️ ELINA & LILI - 2 место duo 🖇️вот такие рузультаты прошедшего фестиваля в казани! всем большое спасибо, очень гордимся друг другом, благодарны, что у нас есть такая возможность участвовать и радовать себя и остальных в том числе 🖇️
❤15custom 52493918662054685441
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @pyala123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 320,351 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лиля чанбиновна” (@pyala123), 362 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pyala123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.