Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @pwrettis21

Channel

@pwrettis21

@pwrettis21tt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

95subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001875500222
TypeChannel
Username@pwrettis21tt
Descriptionmamacita
Created4 March 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pwrettis21tt

Growth

9512 Aug 2026, 07:32 — 95 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:45 — 95 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:3212 Aug 2026, 07:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:4595no change
12 Aug 2026, 07:3295first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Videos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 3 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5237853286240902507615.8%
custom 5237838112121441304513.2%
custom 5417982226065282195410.5%
custom 528324991373857554237.89%
custom 528327116094179159037.89%
custom 528955571170812694337.89%
custom 547213547583571473137.89%
custom 532831517162447429525.26%
custom 534376597287445872825.26%
custom 534392599047099425525.26%
custom 537772272305099731725.26%
custom 522228160313638086112.63%
custom 522239787649101676512.63%
custom 533465139514233710412.63%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2024 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Mar 2026, 10:58 UTC123 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤩Wẽłcøme tø my cħañnéł🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤kirą 🔤ákaħaśhï⭐⭐ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 blõg | pr!v@t | anōn oŵner | t!k łøk | mý słiçk mŷ pẽrş

custom 54179822260652821953custom 52223978764910167651custom 52832499137385755421custom 52895557117081269431custom 53283151716244742951custom 53777227230509973171

4 Mar 2026, 10:56 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔤y cħarącťėrs Suzuka Kanazawa; Kim Jennie; Milly Bobby Brown.

custom 52895557117081269432custom 53437659728744587282custom 52832711609417915901custom 53283151716244742951custom 53777227230509973171custom 54179822260652821951

5 Nov 2024, 15:03 UTC686 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

дорогие мью/вз, прошу вас отметиться под этим постом. Пример: Юз — тгк прошу вас не игнорить этот пост.

custom 52378532862409025076custom 52378381121214413045custom 54721354758357147313custom 52832499137385755422custom 52832711609417915902custom 53439259904709942552custom 52222816031363808611custom 53346513951423371041

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pwrettis21tt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 356,253 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@pwrettis21” (@pwrettis21tt), 95 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwrettis21tt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.