Channel
@pwgood_smc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003855836708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pwgood_smc |
| Description | Сотрудничаю : @shieldmedia_com |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pwgood_smc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 27 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 27 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 275 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 58.3% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как предпочитаешь отдыхать? [ 🤩🤩🤩] :: #NEWPOST ⬜️Как и все обычные люди, лёжа в мягкой кроватке или же заниматься домашними делами, но чаще всего я начинаю работать над видео или же делать схемат для очередного МЕГА КРУТОГО И ВАЖНОГО ПРОЕКТА, к этому относятся дела и на сервера Майшилда. ⬜️Я ну знаете о-о-очень занятой.
❤1
Почему у тебя на стримах иногда слышно секби? Будет объяснения? [ 🤩🤩🤩] :: #NEWPOST ⬜️Мне кажется у вас уже мозги и мысли всеми забиты пейрингом меня и Секби! Иначе я не могу объяснить этот вопрос, вам уже ве-е-езде Секби мерещится, уже вопросы к вам чатеры. ⬜️Не удивлюсь если вы и секби задаете похожие вопросы!
❤1
[ 🤩🤩🤩] :: #NEWPOST Йооу, вы бы знали чат КАК ЖЕ МНОГО, я работаю в последнее время, просто не представляете! Вы так сильно забили мою почту своими сообщениями, что мне теперь это все разгребать и разгребать! Но не переживайте я отвечу на все ваши вопросы, арты и ссылки я оставлю уже на стримы.
❤1
[🌟🌟] — время я на тебя всегда найду. Не волнуйся.
❤1
Signed [РЕСТ ] • SecB. . channel
[ 🌟🌟 ] — Ты... Полный идиот. Вот невозможно просто!
❤1
Signed [РЕСТ ] • SecB. . channel
[ 🤩🤩🤩] :: #NEWPOST У меня нет слов одни эмоции, как вы так быстро разбираете все на Эдиты и фанфики с Артами. От этого уж не отвертишься.. Да и я люблю ваше творчество, я уверен секби тоже
✍1❤1
[ 🌟🌟] — После одного такого стрима про нас столько видео пошло...
Signed [РЕСТ ] • SecB. . channel
Будут еще ирл стримы как было с секби? [ 🤩🤩🤩 ] :: #NEWPOST А вот я даже не знаю, знаете у нас Секби о-о-очень занятой ящер, хотя можно было бы и с модди проводить такие стримы, но до Модди ехать как до Китая! Поэтому такие стримы под вопросом.
Пугод, объясни один момент. 🫤 Вы с Секби «просто коллеги», почему ты на последнем стриме так взбесился, когда его в чате начали шипперить с Кэтрин? Откуда столько агрессии на ровном месте? Ревнуешь? [🤩🤩🤩 ] :: #NEWPOST Это все отыгрыш как вы не понимаете, ха-ха. Все ведь просто шутка, не больше! Вы и до этого меня считали агрессивным, забыли? Персона я такая, что уж поделать! Но вам я погляжу очень нравится совать нос…
❤2🍾2👌2
Пугод, почему у тебя в последнем сторис на фоне точно такая же плюшевая черепашка, как у Секби? Он на недавнем стриме рассказывал, что выиграл ее в тире 🤔🤔 [ 🤩🤩🤩 ] :: #NEWPOST Всем вам расскажи, да покажи! Просто точно такая же игрушка, в прошлый раз просто оставил ее у меня в квартире и вот, теперь эта черепаха моя.
❤2👨💻2
Шляпник, как тебе вообще работается в холдинге? Кураторы сильно душнят по поводу контента или тебе, как главному гению, дают полную свободу? [ 🤩🤩🤩 ] :: #NEWPOST Пфф, конечно же мне как гению, у меня полная свобода! Ах ладно, шучу конечно же, меня не сильно душат по поводу контента, ведь я сдаю все в сроки и у меня полно-о-о идей. Вы ведь знаете меня.
❤2🕊2
[ 🤩🤩🤩 ] :: #NEWPOST По ощущениям моя техника будет скоро плавиться от того как же жарко! Сидеть работать просто невыносимо, каждый раз клонит в сон, хоть два вентилятора ставь к кондиционеру, может так жарко не будет.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pwgood_smc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,253,603 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᏢᎳᏀᴏᴏd” (@pwgood_smc), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwgood_smc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.