Channel
@pvtlockernews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001784109612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pvtlockernews |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 14 December 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pvtlockernews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 33 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 33 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
Hey Guys! I kindly remind all private sale investors who would like join the testphase for the product and be part for a short discussion on how we should move forward to DM me in private so i can send you over the privategroup invitation link! Here my DM link: https://t.me/pvtlockeradmin Thank You guys. Also we will close this group as it looks botted now and we need to make a new fresh group and re-do the call…
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hey Guys! I kindly ask all private sale investors who would like join the testphase for the product and be part for a short discussion on how we should move forward to DM me in private so i can send you over the privategroup invitation link! Here my DM link: https://t.me/pvtlockeradmin Thank You 🚀
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hey PVTLocker Family! We apologize for having a bit of delay on the testing phase, we had some issues on the backend part which we didnt saw coming and needed to fix it before beeing able to share it with you guys. The plan was to share the testing phase with all our private sale investors by today but it seems like the claim function has some bugs on it - so we are working on this and once its solved we are happy t…
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hey Guys! First of all, we hope each one of you had some great and blessed quality time with their families and a blast going into the new year so far! We surely did 🙂 but we used this time also to go deeply into the work we needed to! Lets make this Update quick and informative for everyone: ✅Contract is ready. (Platform Smart Contract) ✅Frontend is close to finish, and we are now working on the backend. I think…
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hello Everyone, thanks for being patient and voting on the last poll. We Appreciate it. ✅ For now, we have decided as follows: We will move on with the product development and re-schedule a new presale in combination with the finished product somewhere around the second week in january. This will help increase investor's confidence and a lot of people will realize how important this product is meant to be in this m…
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hey Guys, thanks to anyone for participating today including the poll! We will cancel for now the presale so everyone is able to clam their BNB’s back and come up with a new plan 💪
Signed PVTL ADMIN
Hey Guys, sad that such a great utility didnt get the traction on the market yet! Which option would you prefer?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PVTL ADMIN
🔥🔥PRESALE IS PUBLIC NOW🔥🔥 OFFICIAL LINK: https://www.pinksale.finance/#/launchpad/0x673Fa4869F6C1a0784296f58a6ded47A01f3c338?chain=BSC
Signed PVTL ADMIN
🔥🔥PRESALE IS LIVE🔥🔥 LFG! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 OFFICIAL LINK: https://www.pinksale.finance/#/launchpad/0x673Fa4869F6C1a0784296f58a6ded47A01f3c338?chain=BSC
Signed Amy
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pvtlockernews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hey Guys, sad that such a great utility didnt get the traction on the market yet! Which option would you prefer?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2021 to 29 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,271,243 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pvtlockernews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PVTLOCKER ANNOUNCEMENT” (@pvtlockernews), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pvtlockernews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.