Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пазл | Канал об отношениях

Channel

Пазл | Канал об отношениях

@puzzle_dating_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,916subscribers

+2,574 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002735863139
TypeChannel
Username@puzzle_dating_channel
DescriptionОфициальный канал сервиса Пазл❣️Знакомства Наш телеграм-бот: t.me/puzzle_dating_bot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/puzzle_dating_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3429,9168,6296 August 2026 — 7,342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,342 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,346 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,392 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,459 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,475 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,469 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,449 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,524 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,614 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,643 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,622 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,643 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,662 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,759 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,896 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,954 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,947 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,097 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,144 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,124 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,107 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,794 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,342 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,601 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,916 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +2,574. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,956–10,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 02:479,916+315
6 Nov 2026, 05:489,601+259
2 Nov 2026, 23:289,342+548
30 Oct 2026, 15:068,794+687
27 Oct 2026, 08:548,107-17
23 Oct 2026, 23:508,124-20
21 Oct 2026, 07:198,144+47
18 Oct 2026, 15:398,097+150
15 Oct 2026, 08:187,947-7
12 Oct 2026, 15:567,954+58
5 Oct 2026, 19:017,896+137
28 Sept 2026, 03:007,759+97
18 Sept 2026, 23:217,662+19
14 Sept 2026, 07:357,643+21
10 Sept 2026, 06:197,622-21
5 Sept 2026, 00:577,643+29
1 Sept 2026, 02:597,614+90
28 Aug 2026, 17:467,524+53
25 Aug 2026, 20:347,471+22
22 Aug 2026, 10:137,449first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.3%
avg views ÷ 9,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,100
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held57 (14 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total94,299
Reactions total1,478
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 10:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
327
Videos
27
Links
136

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,041 reactions across 55 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,041100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,041 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (52.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC799 views17 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Говорят, второй брак крепче, потому что супруги уже знают, как не надо. Но это не точно. 😄 🎙 Сегодня в 18:00 (МСК) обсуждаем: «Второй брак: как сделать его другим, а не просто попыткой номер 2» Наши гости — Александра и Егор Анфимовы, психологи, гештальт-терапевты и супруги. Поговорим о любви со второго раза, семейных традициях, отношениях с детьми и о том, как из нескольких разных историй сложить одну счастливую…

❤17

9 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,590 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Как не потерять свой мэтч Всем привет! На связи Анастасия Широкова, управляющая Пазла. Хочу поделиться небольшим лайфхаком, возможно не все пользователи о нем знают. Мы стараемся, чтобы наш бот не спамил вас бесконечными уведомлениями. Автоматически чистим диалог, удаляя неактуальные сообщения, типа вчерашних приглашений в подборку. Но все равно в потоке сообщений легко потерять самое ценное - ❤️ваши мэтчи ❤️ По…

❤45

7 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC≈3,570 views149 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

10% самых привлекательных мужчин получают в 30 раз больше лайков 🧠 Это результаты математического моделирования классических больших дейтингов типа Тиндера. Их сделал проект Memable Data, сопоставив 1000 мужских профилей и 1000 женских. Привет, на связи Никита Словиковский, основатель сервиса 👋 Сегодня хочу немного посвятить вас в мир сурового мужского опыта использования классических дейтингов. И о того, почему…

❤149

6 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC≈3,770 views90 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

♟️ Шахматы были. Но не всем пригодились. 😄 Вчера в баре YOLO мы устроили быстрые свидания с шахматами. Играли, знакомились, смеялись, иногда забывали, чей ход, а иногда вообще забывали про шахматы. Кто-то впервые взял в руки шахматную фигуру, кто-то уверенно ставил мат, а кто-то так увлёкся разговором, что шахматная партия закончилась, не успев начаться. В общем, шахматисты, возможно, остались бы недовольны. А во…

❤90

5 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈4,220 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Почти каждый третий брак в России — повторный. По данным за 2024 год, 32% зарегистрированных брачных союзов заключали люди, для которых это был не первый брак. Казалось бы, во второй раз мы уже опытнее. Знаем, чего хотим, какие ошибки совершали и с чем точно больше не готовы мириться. Но почему тогда в новых отношениях возникают старые конфликты? А если в семье появляются дети от предыдущих браков, бывшие супруги …

❤45

4 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC≈4,140 views104 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Нам невероятно повезло с нашими пользователями 🥰 Привет, на связи Никита Словиковский, основатель сервиса. И я правда считаю, что у нас лучшая аудитория из всех дейтингов России, а возможно и мира. Вы не просто уважительно и открыто общаетесь в комментариях. Не просто помогаете нам создавать пространство, в котором приятно находиться. Вы делитесь этим пространством и нашими идеями с другими 🤲 На мою просьбу поде…

❤104

3 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈5,910 views58 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Кто именно ставит больше лайков: мужчины или женщины? Спросили вы у нас недавно в комментариях. Всем привет! На связи Анастасия Широкова, управляющая Пазла, с ответом на этот вопрос. На картинке цифры за неделю. Что видим здесь мы: 💜 Мужчины лайкают чаще Среди всех реакций мужчины ставят лайк в 25% случаев, женщины — в 15,2%. То есть мужчины в среднем лайкают каждую 4ю анкету, женщины - каждую 6 или 7 анкету. …

❤58

2 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈3,820 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026

⭕️Мы начинаем прямой эфир с командой Пазла и психологом Ильей Калининым. 🎙 Тема эфира: «Опыт первых свиданий: что считать кринжем, от чего случаются бабочки и когда стоит идти на второе» Для вашего удобства мы ведем трансляцию на нескольких платформах: 🌱 Telegram Прямо в этом канале: https://t.me/puzzle_dating_channel?livestream 🌱 YouTube Смотреть по ссылке: https://youtube.com/live/BGoBQt2TXfk?feature=share …

❤4

2 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC≈4,060 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

А вы знаете, почему вас не позвали на второе свидание? Может, дело было вовсе не в вас? Или, наоборот, вы сделали что-то такое, о чём даже не подозреваете? 😏 Уже сегодня в 18:00 (МСК) будем обсуждать первые свидания. 🎙 Тема эфира: «Опыт первых свиданий: что считать кринжем, от чего случаются бабочки и когда стоит идти на второе» В гостях — Илья Калинин, психолог и предприниматель. Сегодня не будет теории. Будем …

❤18

1 Nov 2026, 08:47 UTC≈4,060 views96 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

У нас залетела карусель 🎯🥳 И привела больше 1200 человек новой аудитории в сервис 😎 Привет, на связи Никита Словиковский, основатель сервиса. Новенькие, добро пожаловать 🤗 Мы всей командой очень рады здесь каждому из вас 🥰 И этот новый приход людей в сервис – он достаточно большой. Мы приросли на 10% ко всей базе. Прошли отметку в 12.000 пользователей. Плюс, мы начали расти по всей России, а не только по Екатер…

❤96

30 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC≈4,110 views60 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Я в Эрмитаже такой красоты не видел, как в ваших комментариях к этому посту: https://t.me/puzzle_dating_channel/503 Всем привет, на связи Никита Словиковский, основатель сервиса. И сейчас я хочу подвести итоги небольшого конкурса на лучшую историю о свидании из Пазла с перечислением гринфлагов. Мои фавориты 😌 🥹 https://t.me/puzzle_dating_channel/503?comment=11996 Прекрасная история знакомства, вынес ее даже на с…

❤60

29 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC≈3,870 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Первое свидание — это всегда немного лотерея. Иногда за полчаса понимаешь, что встретил человека мечты. А иногда уже через 15 минут мысленно ищешь пути эвакуации. 😄 🎙 2 ноября в 18:00 (МСК) приглашаем на прямой эфир: «Опыт первых свиданий: что считать кринжем, от чего случаются бабочки и когда стоит идти на второе» В этот раз решили отказаться от привычного формата! Никаких лекций, презентаций и теории. Только ж…

❤40

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @puzzle_dating_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@puzzle_dating_channel edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTCAnonymous Poll787 voters

Вам нужна функция "Показывайте мне только тех людей, у кого есть дети"?

  1. Да, я ищу ТОЛЬКО партнера с детьми и мне нужен такой фильтр7%
  2. Меня текущие фильтры устраивают, не вижу смысла в этом изменении69%
  3. Просто посмотреть ответы24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пазл | Канал об отношениях” (@puzzle_dating_channel), 9,916 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puzzle_dating_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.