Channel
@puteshestviya_kukuhoj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002938926889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @puteshestviya_kukuhoj |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/puteshestviya_kukuhoj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 65 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 64 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 62 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 62 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 37.5% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Неидеальная работа неидеального психолога была сегодня на демосессии. Обсуждали обсессивно-компульсивную динамику. У меня случайно получился незапланированный мастер-класс по границам в терапии (как раз в тему недавнего поста). Сделали запись с согласия клиента и других участников, приобрести ее можно за 300 рублей (под постом или в личку @psycholog_dlya_rolevikov). Будет полезно тем, кто интересуется типами личност…
👍2
#психомем да в нем намек. Потому что экологично выражать нужно именно ту эмоцию, которую чувствуешь. Хотите, кстати, экологичных и безопасных способов проживания эмоций?
👍4🔥3
Напоминаю, что уже завтра в 14.00 состоится очередной эфир по определению типа личности. Клиент и психолог (я) уже есть, но можно заявиться наблюдателем: здесь в комментариях, в личку @psycholog_dlya_rolevikov или через Яндекс-формы https://forms.yandex.ru/u/6a70bad349363917deda9b95 Цена 700 рублей.
👍1
#психомем прям до слез
😁6💯2
#пятничное_нытье
😁5🤣3
https://disk.yandex.ru/d/4ixyiocSX6ZZxA Запись сегодняшней камерной встречи. Хоруса, кстати, не обсуждали))
🔥2
Ну и тут, кстати, сразу, конечно, много можно упомянуть уточняющих нюансов: например, при случайной личной встрече психологу не рекомендуется демонстрировать личное знакомство с клиентом. Есть разночтения по сроку давности, когда можно было бы вступить в приятельские отношения после окончания терапии (но, кстати, в романтические или сексуальные никогда, тут сообщество едино во мнениях).
👍2
Задавайте свои вопросы, кстати, давно что-то вопросов не было)
#вопрос_психологу Знаю, что психологи не работают с друзьями, родственниками и т.д., какова допустимая степень знакомства? Тут, как обычно, нет однозначного ответа, но скажу, на что я ориентируюсь. 1) Не должно быть "двойных отношений" и конфликта интересов (товарно-денежных, рабочих, дружеских, родственных). 2) Не должно быть смешения контекстов (например,если я беру клиента из ролевого комьюнити, мне теперь надо пр…
👍3🤔1
А помните у нас тут была рубрика #дифференциальная_диагностика? В ней можно почитать про различия между типами личности. А я вот после последних демосессий (есть в закрепе, кстати) я думаю про различие между диссоциацией и изоляцией. Диссоциация - это это защитный механизм, при котором человек временно отделяется от собственных чувств, воспоминаний или происходящего с ним события, воспринимая происходящее «не со мной…
👍2🔥1
Тем временем пока вы записываетесь на ближайшие демосессии с реальными клиентами, уже сегодня в 20.00 мы будем обсуждать персонажей несуществующих, зато трехметровых. Ссылка вот https://telemost.yandex.ru/j/37535552183126 Персонажи из вселенной Вархаммер (30к), эфир проведём совместно с https://t.me/warhahammer
👍1
Путешествуйте с сиром Адрианом 2.0 pinned «Для начала представлюсь. Меня зовут Лункина Мария и я психолог. Почему обратиться ко мне хорошая идея? - У меня фундаментальное образование. Психфак МГУ, клиническая психология, кандидатская диссертация. А значит я за доказательный подход, без эзотерики и…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @puteshestviya_kukuhoj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Демонстрационная сессия с разбором
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путешествуйте с сиром Адрианом 2.0” (@puteshestviya_kukuhoj), 65 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puteshestviya_kukuhoj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.