Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нажимаем кнопки

Channel

Нажимаем кнопки

@pushing_buttons

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002259310887
TypeChannel
Username@pushing_buttons
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pushing_buttons

Growth

210213211.56 August 2026 — 210 subscribers7 August 2026 — 210 subscribers13 August 2026 — 213 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 210–213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:18213+3
7 Aug 2026, 03:45210no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:45210first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
322.5%
avg views ÷ 213 subscribers
Avg views / post
687
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held13 (17 September 20252 August 2026)
Views total3,435
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11158.7%
6433.9%
👍63.17%
🐳52.65%
❤‍🔥10.529%
😁10.529%
🤩10.529%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оставляем нашего сотрудника работать, а сами идём спать

1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,710 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6316👍6

21 May 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В первой версии квиза в режиме multiple choice была проблема с качеством вопросов. Предложения генерировались на ходу дешёвой моделью Qwen Flash. Было заметно несколько проблем: * Вопросы часто повторялись. Это известная проблема в изучении языков в целом – грамматические конструкции часто демонстрируют одними и теми же предложениями * Среди вариантов ответов можно было найти несколько правильных, а иногда ни один не

2

20 May 2026, 21:38 UTC969 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что нового Если кто-то подумал, что я полгода прокрастинировал, то вы ошибаетесь! Я просто ждал, когда AI прогрессирует достаточно, чтобы можно было не писать код самому. На самом деле я прокрастинировал AI действительно стал заметно лучше, и на код уже можно практически не смотреть. В программирование теперь главное – это архитектура и UX. Я пару дней пообщался с Cursor-ом. Кстати, их новая модель Composer 2.5 = 🔥

1

3 Jan 2026, 19:17 UTC986 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возвращаюсь к нажиманию кнопок Недавно начал делать сервис для студентов из Беларуси, изучающих английский язык. Хочу сделать сайт, на котором можно будет практиковать грамматику, общаясь с языковой моделью и получая от неё обратную связь. В Беларуси недоступны языковые модели вроде Gemini и ChatGPT. Чтобы избежать проблем с условиями пользовательского соглашения, я решил использовать Qwen – популярную китайскую мо

6

24 Oct 2025, 20:18 UTC888 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно, чтобы починить индикатор уровня топлива, пришлось купить дров

🐳5

24 Oct 2025, 20:14 UTC698 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Машина на ходу и все функции работают без каких-либо проблем. Я уже проехал на ней около 800 км – ничего при этом не сломалось. Как я к этому пришёл... Двигатель Напомню, чтобы завести двигатель, достаточно было зарядить аккумулятор. Но вскоре оказалось, что в баке было полно воды, поэтому через несколько минут работы машина снова заглохла. Пришлось ещё раз заказать эвакуатор и отвезти машину в сервис, где весь загр

7

24 Oct 2025, 20:14 UTC772 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Индикатор уровня топлива Это самая обидная часть ремонта. Изначально индикатор работал, через какое-то время перестал. Я откладывал решение этой проблемы до последнего, и даже съездил в Манчестере с неработающим индикатором. Всё потому что индикатор является частью топливного насоса. Чтобы заменить индикатор, нужно заменить весь насос. Я убедился в том, что проблема действительно в насосе, отключив его разъём и поста

🔥61❤‍🔥1

17 Sept 2025, 16:53 UTC482 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Диск оказался зашифрован Все диски на маках шифруются секретным ключом - Volume Encryption Key (VEK). Ключ этот сам хранится в зашифрованном виде несколько раз - по одному разу на каждого пользователя. Для того, чтобы получить ключ расшифровки содержимого диска, нужно знать пароль любого из пользователей. Пароль хешируется по определённому алгоритму, из чего получается так называемый Key Encryption Key (KEK). Этим кл

🔥8🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @pushing_buttons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 213,976 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нажимаем кнопки” (@pushing_buttons), 213 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pushing_buttons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.