Channel
@purecoder_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
769subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001581234271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @purecoder_ir |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/purecoder_ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 769 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 769 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
228 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 115 | 50.4% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 28.9% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 10.5% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 3.95% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.19% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥شیائومی توی HyperOS 4 از فلاتر برای توسعه ی اپلیکیشن های بومی خودش استفاده میکنه. لینک مبنع: https://www.gizmochina.com/2026/02/05/xiaomi-hyperos-4-self-developed-os-ai-framework/ Xiaomi is also experimenting with rewriting core system apps using Google’s Flutter framework and the Rust programming language. @purecoder_ir
🔥17👍2❤1
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🔥Abstraction نقشه ی ایستگاه های مترو یه abstraction عه!!! فاصله ی بین همه ی ایستگاه ها توی نقشه یکسانه، در حالیکه در عمل اینجوری نیست. در حالیکه در عمل بین ایستگاه ها پیچ و خم های زیادی وجود داره، ایستکاه ها روی نقشه روی خطوط صاف چیده شده. ایستگاه ها عمق متفاوتی نسبت به هم دارن، بعضی ها عمیق ترن، بعضی ها به سطح زمین نزدیکترن و بعضی ها روی سطح قرار گرفتن. ولی این مساله توی نقشه اصلا مهم نیست و نقشه هیچ اطلاعاتی از…
🔥11👍2
Signed Mohammad Taheri
این elif توی پایتون باحاله. قشنگ و راحت تلفظ میشه: الیف. خیلی راحتره تا اینکه بگی: الز ایف. اگه با دید سرسختانه که همش دوس داریم پایتون رو بکوبیم بهش نگاه نکنیم. بنظر من syntax پایتون زشت نیس و در کل خیلیم خوبه. @purecoder_ir
👍11👎3
Signed Mohammad Taheri
این لیست ناقصه و این پست تاحدودی طنز بود. زبان های زیادی رو اصلا بهشون اشاره ای نکرده، مثل Go, Rust, zig. یا متلب زبان برنامه نویسی به حساب نمیومد، یه اسباب بازی بود که بچه های برق و مکانیک بیشتر ازش استفاده میکردن. هر زبانی توی شرایط خودش کارایی و سودمندی خودش رو داره. ولی به طور کلی زبانی مثل JS رو کسی نمیتونه نادیده بگیره، بالاخره کار هر کسی بهش گیر میکنه و کامیونیتی قوی ای هم داره. زبان هایی مثل جاوا، سی شارپ…
👍7❤2🔥1
Signed Mohammad Taheri
پایتون همه جا هست. جاوا به جز یک جا همه جا هست. سی شارپم به جز دو جا بقیه جاها هست. پی اچ پی و دارت و سوییفت فقط یه جا هستن!!! حتی روبی هم دو جا هست. حالا هی از پایتون بد بگید🤬🤬 ولی روبی از همشون اصیل تره.😳 و جاوا اسکریپت شتریه که در خونه ی همه میخوابه، چه بخوای چه نخوای.🐫 @purecoder_ir
👍3☃2👏1🤔1🤣1
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🔥یک نکته ی کوچیک public class AuthorDto { [Key] public Guid Id {get; set;} [Required] [MaxLength(50)] public string FirstName {get; set;} [Required] [MaxLength(50)] public string LastName {get; set;} [Required] public DateTimeOffset DateOfBirth {get; set;} [Required] [MaxLength(50)] public string MainCategory {get; set;} public ICollection<Course> Courses …
🔥8❤4👍1
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🍁وقتی که توی یه web cotroller همه دپندسی ها رو به کانستراکتور inject میکنیم، همه چیز خوشکل و گوگولی به نظر میاد. ولی ممکنه بعضی از action ها از بعضی دپندنسی ها استفاده نکنن. 👈برای مثال توی کلاس CustomersController چند تا متد زیر رو داشته باشیم: ✔️Search ✔️GetById ✔️Add ✔️EditPersonalInfo ✔️Remove دپندنسی هایی که هر کدوم از این اکشن متد ها نیاز دارن ممکنه متفاوت باشه. ❓حالا اگه همه دپندنسی ها رو به کانستراکتور inj…
🔥7❤2
Signed Mohammad Taheri
واقعن هیچ شرکتی کار درست تر از Jet Brains نیست... این یه دونه رو بذارید متعصب باشیم😂😂
👍14🔥5👎2
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🔥Fluent Validation ✅پکیج Fluent Validation یه پکیج محبوب توی سی شارپ هست که برای input validation استفاده میشه و امکانات زیادی داره. 🔥داشتم دنبال چنین چیزی توی دارت میگشتم که یه پکیج با اسم مشابه پیدا کردم که به طور کامل از نمونه ی سی شارپش الهام گرفته. https://pub.dev/packages/fluent_validation class UserValidator extends AbstractValidator<User> { UserValidator() { ruleFor((user) => user.age, key: 'age').isNo…
🔥13❤1
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🔥سطح مهندس های نرم افزار ایران از نگاه کسی که توی گوگل بوده و سال ها خارج از ایران بوده. 😱کسایی که میگن توی ایران سطح فنی همه پایینه و مرغ خارجیا غازه، مشکل از خودشونه!!! ❓خودمون چه قدمی برای بهبود برداشتیم؟ پ.ن: من این فرد رو نمیشناسم و به صحبت هاش استناد نمیکنم. ولی حرفی که میزنه رو قبول دارم و اصلن قبول ندارم که توی ایران سطح فنی افتضاحه و پات رو که از ایران بیرون بگذاری، سطح فنی و عمق دانش سر به فلک میگذاره. ب…
👍15
Signed Mohammad Taheri
🔥Configurations in .NET توی دات نت میتونیم تنظیمات برنامه رو توی سطوح مختلف به برنامه پاس بدیم. 1️⃣appsettings.json 2️⃣appsettings.[Environment].json 👉appsettings.Development.json 👉appsettings.Production.json 3️⃣OS Environment variables 4️⃣Command Line Args 1️⃣پایین ترین سطح appsettings.json هست. 2️⃣بعد از اون تنظیمات مربوط به environment خاص هست. مثل 👉appsettings.Development.json 👉appsettings.Production.json تن…
🔥6👍2
Signed Mohammad Taheri
هدف استفاده از Repository Pattern چیه؟(نظر و تحلیل خودت رو بگو)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5
Signed Mohammad Taheri
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @purecoder_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هدف استفاده از Repository Pattern چیه؟(نظر و تحلیل خودت رو بگو)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آیا اصل Dependency Inversion توی زبان های داینامیک تایپ که چیزی به اسم اینترفیس ندارن هم مطرحه یا این اصل فقط یه مساله مربوط به زبان های استاتیک هست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
به طور کلی دامنه ی تغییرات توی کدوم یک از لایه های زیر بیشتره؟(کوییز نیست، نظر و تحلیل خودت رو بگو)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 8 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 759,657 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pure Coder” (@purecoder_ir), 769 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/purecoder_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.