then k!ll me before the sun 🤩

Channel
◜ ͡ ㅤ𝓎ui !ㅤveritykisser ,𝄞
@puppysavior
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001930026722 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @puppysavior |
| Description | ╰┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ ┄ 𓈒₊𖥔 ࣪˖ ㅤㅤ➧ㅤ @adoringnelil ㅤя со ㅤㅤсмxртью сросся ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤне было ㅤㅤㅤни дня, ㅤчтоб я ㅤㅤㅤㅤо ней не думал。 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤи до сих пор ㅤㅤменя охватывает какой-то животный ужас。 ㅤㅤㅤㅤдумал хоть так выйти, ㅤпотом я 𝗽𝗮𝗰п𝗮л𝗰я。 |
| Created | 19 September 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/puppysavior |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 9 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 19 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
790 reactions across 14 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 249 | 31.5% | |
| custom 5283144167348794134 | 85 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5420354963568098686 | 63 | 7.97% | |
| 🤗 | 56 | 7.09% | |
| custom 5420094027124997800 | 50 | 6.33% | |
| custom 5357202975628485867 | 47 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5420095307025252939 | 30 | 3.80% | |
| 👻 | 28 | 3.54% | |
| custom 5258205078967314470 | 24 | 3.04% | |
| 🐳 | 21 | 2.66% | |
| custom 5255950758007824132 | 19 | 2.41% | |
| ⚡ | 19 | 2.41% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 2.28% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 2.15% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 1.65% | |
| 👾 | 11 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 1.39% | |
| custom 5420321621736975883 | 10 | 1.27% | |
| custom 5460659477839621594 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| custom 5420579010537095560 | 7 | 0.886% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.38% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 790reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2023 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 10
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @puppysavior. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 September 2023 to 21 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
ᅠ ›› ♡゙ᆢ RESULTS ⇅ @MAINIRL ↴ ꞈ ⋮ подводя итоги, главным ирл даня кашин становится ! ! ↓ ᅠ ↳ @ : @puppysavior набрав 1996 голосов !
ㅤ﹝ ♡ ⋮ WIN [⇅] fr. - @BESTIRL ↴ ⥂ . . z Z ⋮ главным ирл хан замай становится . . ⇊ ↳ @› – @zamaykisser набирая 777 голосов
👻4🕊4
File, posted without a caption
custom 528314416734879413413custom 542035496356809868613custom 542009530702525293912custom 54200940271249978005🕊1
в душе темно,но я знаю,как звать рассвет...🤍 😀➖𓏲ּ𝄢ㅤ﹫𝓀olya,yui,kiwihu🤩 😀😀😀😀he > any prns . 🌟♾️♾️diagnosed! dni ꕀ fandoms◞ games◞ kinnlist◞ selfsona◞ credits◞ playlist◞ wishlist◞ luvlist◞ dmㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩 ...чиркни зажигалкой,и с неба придет ответ🤍
custom 542035496356809868617custom 542009402712499780010custom 52831441673487941349custom 54203216217369758833custom 54200953070252529392
File, posted without a caption
custom 528314416734879413414custom 54200953070252529399custom 54200940271249978007custom 54203216217369758832🕊1
и когда я признаюсь,я душою не кривлю...🤍 😀😀😀ㅤ🎀ames : :😀😀ㅤ₍ online⸝co-op ⁾ ㅤ ◜ ᵎ⌇ ₍roblox⁾ ⦂ sewh,minesweeper,regretevator,pressure,write a letter,animal hospital,some silly places etc😻😻also minecraft,pony⸝ashes town,tomoland,дурак онлайн,sekai etc😻😻 🤩🤩🤩🤩ㅤ𝓈ingle play : :😀 ㅤ ◜ ᵎ⌇ my tamagotchi forever😀😀,nyan cat,shoujo city,mazm,slime rancher,pocket love,cooking mama,itst,sekai 😻😻 ...идеалист и дуралей,молодой герце
custom 542009402712499780017custom 542035496356809868613custom 528314416734879413410custom 54203216217369758833🕊1
я подавно горюю,недососанный чупик...🤍 😀😀😀ㅤ🎀andoms : :😀ㅤ₍ main only ⁾ ㅤ ◜ ᵎ⌇ ₍ru⁾twitch⸝rave😀😀 dispatch😀😀 verity&creator😀😀 desperate housewives😀😀 popee the performer😀😀 chiikawa😀😀 ninah😀😀😻😻 🤩🤩🤩🤩ㅤ 𝓈econdary : in here !☺️ ...засыхает без губ твоих,да,я эгоист🤍
custom 542035496356809868620custom 528314416734879413412custom 542009402712499780011🕊2custom 54205790105370955601
😍🧑🦳ㅤ🤩🤍ovelist 🥹 👱♂️🧡talk to me! o-u-o-uh,talk to me! ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌸🌸ㅤ𝓃elilㅤ🌸🌸 😀😀😀😀 𝓂y 😱 for 𝓂y 😱 😀😀😀😀𝓂y ❔ for 𝓂y ❔ 😀😀😀😀 𝓂y ❔ for 𝓂y ❔ 🌸🌸 and i dont deserve u,u deserve the world . . ⭐ though it feels like we were built from the same . . ᛝ ᛝㅤ dirt 🌟🌟
custom 528314416734879413419🕊12custom 535720297562848586712custom 54205790105370955603👻1
ꕀㅤ⤹ tap here if y͟u͟i͟d͟a͟n͟y͟a͟s͟ c͟a͟n͟o͟n!
custom 535720297562848586735👻17🕊16💔11custom 54200953070252529394custom 52831441673487941343custom 54205790105370955602
это не мой кн саша дрейк, выдающая свои бредни за мои, сдохнет🥹
⚡9🕊7custom 52831441673487941345custom 52559507580078241323custom 52582050789673144702
ㅤㅤㅤ⭐️
🕊7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @puppysavior. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 561,824 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“◜ ͡ ㅤ𝓎ui !ㅤveritykisser ,𝄞” (@puppysavior), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puppysavior.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.