Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Паплуша×РЕСТ

@pupl0py

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

81subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001841567123
TypeChannel
Username@pupl0py
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pupl0py

Growth

8111 Aug 2026, 04:47 — 81 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:18 — 81 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:4712 Aug 2026, 03:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1881no change
11 Aug 2026, 04:4781first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51926577705868668513821.5%
custom 54201965995339541713720.9%
custom 52985983487380319653117.5%
custom 53458286094435099062111.9%
custom 52873509203114903841910.7%
custom 53461081989295769781810.2%
custom 5386805599629483823137.34%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟Вот я придумала опять какую-то историю с этими чувачками можете попридумывать им имена (я очень сильно пытаюсь байтить вас на комменты)

custom 53458286094435099066custom 51926577705868668511custom 54201965995339541711

2 Jun 2026, 07:44 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я оживаю🤩

custom 53458286094435099067custom 51926577705868668515custom 54201965995339541713

27 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Больше нечем похвастаться, я вообще к рисованию не притрагивалась

custom 53461081989295769784custom 53868055996294838232

27 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Мама я в телевизоре

custom 53458286094435099065

27 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @zecafild1Photo

😙🤞😈😅😙 МОЗАИКИ челленджа✏️✏️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Авторы и их получившиеся адопты : 1. @nora_roxyan 2.@thesifymaster 3. @wyleymip 4.@Sienasan19 5.@daiko_o0o 6.@pupl0py 7.@voncewwr 8. @artbox03 Полные версии адоптов можете посмотреть у них на каналах. А их конечности увидите в полном ролике на ютуб 🌐 НАЖМИ ЧТОБЫ ПОСМОТРЕТЬ 🐾 Я была невероятно рада провести этот челлендж. Он для меня первый, но все художники такие лап

custom 52985983487380319653custom 52873509203114903842

6 Feb 2026, 13:30 UTC226 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Реквест для @Kiarra1502 💐💐💐

custom 51926577705868668518custom 53461081989295769785custom 52873509203114903844custom 52985983487380319651

5 Feb 2026, 19:34 UTC167 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Чучуть похвастаюсь

custom 542019659953395417110custom 52873509203114903845custom 53461081989295769785

5 Feb 2026, 11:01 UTC324 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

👑А у кого это сегодня день рожденияя У МЕНЯЯЯ🎀

custom 529859834873803196511custom 51926577705868668517custom 52873509203114903846

5 Feb 2026, 10:03 UTC131 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔸🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🔸 -➕🅰️🅰️🅰️➕- - от Коти - - Не знаешь, где найти интересный арт -интерактив❓ Или хочешь опубликовать свой, чтобы привлечь больше участников ❓- Добро пожаловать в... -⏬⏬ИНТЕРАКТИВ-ЧАТ⏬⏬- @BakeryUnderTheSun2 -🆙Здесь вы можете опубликовать свой ивент, а также поучаствовать в ранее опубликованых нашими участниками 😀- -❗️Чат исключительно для публикаций Интерактивов❗️- #ИнтЧат

custom 54201965995339541713custom 51926577705868668512custom 52985983487380319652

5 Feb 2026, 07:09 UTC144 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мой артик на тайного санту🤩🎧

custom 54201965995339541719custom 51926577705868668514custom 53461081989295769784

3 Feb 2026, 13:44 UTC116 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓😉 💛 Хэд.........300₽ Халф.......500₽ Фулл.......1000₽ Предоплата 50% Доп.персонаж +100% Не рисую: нсфв, гуро 💛 дедлайн до 2 недель ОПЛАТА по номеру карты, Тбанк 💛ЛС @mle8eow

custom 52985983487380319654custom 54201965995339541713custom 53458286094435099062

3 Feb 2026, 10:37 UTC106 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Коммишка для @mamoka_chan 🙏

custom 52985983487380319657custom 53868055996294838232custom 54201965995339541712

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pupl0py. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 914,106 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паплуша×РЕСТ” (@pupl0py), 81 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pupl0py.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.