Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pun Dog

Channel

Pun Dog

@pundog_ton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002028977264
TypeChannel
Username@pundog_ton
DescriptionIt's time for the greatest Pun Dog in the history of memes! $PUN will win your heart with puns! https://pundog.io Community: https://t.me/pundogchat
Created28 March 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pundog_ton

Growth

1597 Aug 2026, 12:33 — 159 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:30 — 159 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:338 Aug 2026, 17:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:30159no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:33159first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

521 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥24547.0%
😁13726.3%
👍7414.2%
519.79%
🥰142.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 521reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2024 to 3 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 May 2024, 09:48 UTC≈1,270 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Yo fellaz! How was your "It's so over" week of blood and liquidations? We're still here and barking loud! RUFF RUFF! $PUN on TON EN chat | RU chat | X.com

😁82👍1🔥1

26 Apr 2024, 09:15 UTC≈1,270 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

mmmm.. I like that basket of shitcoins🥰 $TON $PUN $DUREV $ANON $REDO And what about you?🐶 EN chat | RU chat | X.com

😁65

25 Apr 2024, 09:13 UTC945 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Memes, nfts or bluechips, sir, what do you prefer?😃 EN chat | RU chat | X.com

😁101🔥1

23 Apr 2024, 15:02 UTC904 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Not for $PUN, is it? 🐶😎 EN chat | RU chat | X.com

😁9👍31

21 Apr 2024, 03:23 UTC767 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wait! Is it already 04.21 ? EN chat | RU chat | X.com

8🔥3

20 Apr 2024, 04:00 UTC698 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM or not GM?😀 EN chat | RU chat | X.com

🔥6😁2

19 Apr 2024, 04:34 UTC648 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We're starting! Looks like we got some momentum going on $TON before Pavel Durov speech 😎 Go #PUN #DUREV #ANON #REDO ! EN chat | RU chat | X.com

🔥10👍31

19 Apr 2024, 03:56 UTC566 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ladies and gentlemen, it is with great pleasure that I invite you... Plunge into the world of dog puns, enthusiastic paws and a tailed community! (You're still PUNtastically early) EN chat |RU chat

🔥112

18 Apr 2024, 13:37 UTC548 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM punners, dog lovers and funsters! We’re on coingecko ! Check it here ⚡️ Be ready to hear more this week 🐶 $PUN #TON

🔥125🥰3

15 Apr 2024, 07:01 UTC710 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wuf wuf 🐶 EN chat | RU chat | X.com

😁13👍3

12 Apr 2024, 15:12 UTC726 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pun Durev thinks about how to make people even richer after #TON drop for meme traders What can you offer more?😜

😁204👍4

12 Apr 2024, 10:11 UTC698 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM🐶 - 2.5 mln $ MC reached 🔥 - #15 trending #TON coin on dexscreener - 320 + holders and growing ⚡️ - trading on @dedust and @stonfidex EN chat | RU chat | X.com

🔥21👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pundog_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,273,016 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pun Dog” (@pundog_ton), 159 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pundog_ton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.