Channel
@pulvisetumbresumus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
341subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001634737852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pulvisetumbresumus |
| Created | 10 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pulvisetumbresumus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 341 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 344 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 346 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 345 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 347 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 347 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
148 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 66.9% | |
| 🕊 | 46 | 31.1% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pulvisetumbresumus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#этимология Если вы не готовы делиться вкусняшками со своими друзьями, то задумайтесь друзья ли они вам после этого. Слово compagnon восходит к двум латинским корням: cum и panis, что дословно переводится как "с хлебом". То есть это человек, с которым вы делите свой хлеб. Во французском языке также существует слово copain, то есть приятель. Там мы более отчетливо видим слово pain (хлеб). Признавайтесь, когда в пос…
❤14🙏3
Волк в овечьей шкуре или что общего у Солтбёрна и Под маской Луизы Мэй Олкотт часть II Похожим приемом пользуется Эмеральд Феннел, создавая персонаж Оливера. Он буквально паразитирует на семье Каттон. Подобно термиту, выгрызающему дом до основания, он находит слабые места в сердцах каждого члена семьи. Метафорична и сцена с поглощением менструальной крови, где Оливер буквально находится в образе вампира. А во время…
❤8
Волк в овечьей шкуре или что общего у Солтбёрна и Под маской Образ волка в овечьей шкуре далеко не нов, его истоки можно найти у всех народов от ирландского фолклора до библии. Связано это может быть с подсознательным страхом перед чужаками. ____ В мифологии и преданиях чужак появлялся в виде странника, являясь на деле дьяволом или нечистью. Позднее, образ был переосмыслен. Сейчас довольно тяжело отследить первоис…
❤8
Моя любимая новость этой недели Корейская художница Dajai Yusanmu угорела с Леонида Коневского и начала рисовать мемы с его участием.
❤23
Девочки говорят "то, что надо", буквально подразумевая дружбу с магическим лесным созданием
🕊14❤2
Как французский эпос менял язык "Роман о лисе" («Roman de Renard») это сатирическая средневековая эпопея, написанная на старофранцузском языке о хитреце Ренаре (Рейнеке), олицетворяющем коварство. Первоисточником скорее всего служит индийский фолклор, но особую популярность эпос получил среди европейских народов. Цикл историй является слепком своей эпохи, изображающим такие реалии, как судебные процессы (которые в…
🕊11❤6
Воздух в отпуске опьяняет...
🕊7❤4
Кто я такая, чтобы противостоять трендам. Если бы я была: месяцем, едой, местом, букетом, домом, одеждой, песней
🕊14❤8
В связи со своим недавним походом, спешу поделиться новым словом. Курумник или курум. От древнетюркского qorum, что обозначает "каменные россыпи". В научный оборот этот термин был внедрен геологом Я. А. Макеровым в 1913 году. Курумник -это естественное скопление остроугольных глыб, образовывающих единый покров на поверхности земли. Появляются же они благодаря резким перепадам температур и постоянному замерзанию и …
❤11
Польский художник Петр Стахевич (Стасевич) и несколько картин из его цикла BOŽY ROK (Божий Год). Каждая картина олицетворяет месяц. Важно отметить, что в своих произведениях художник намеренно стремился к слиянию историй святых и сцен из жизни обычных крестьян. На картинах изображены: Июнь. Святой Иоан с кувшином малины. Июль. Святая Анна просит своего внука, чтобы одно поле дало втрое больше урожая (святая Анна- …
❤15
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pulvisetumbresumus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мы прах и тень” (@pulvisetumbresumus), 341 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pulvisetumbresumus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.