Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PublicPolls

Channel

PublicPolls

@publicpolls0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

260subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001168819807
TypeChannel
Username@publicpolls0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/publicpolls0

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2602782697 August 2026 — 278 subscribers7 August 2026 — 278 subscribers13 August 2026 — 276 subscribers20 August 2026 — 271 subscribers27 August 2026 — 268 subscribers5 September 2026 — 265 subscribers13 September 2026 — 267 subscribers26 September 2026 — 266 subscribers7 October 2026 — 260 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 62 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 257–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 23:40260-6
26 Sept 2026, 18:56266-1
13 Sept 2026, 02:21267+2
5 Sept 2026, 10:36265-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:44268-3
20 Aug 2026, 13:12271-5
13 Aug 2026, 14:05276-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:13278no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:03278first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2357.5%
👌1435.0%
👏25.00%
👎12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📊 JSP 📝 CJP ki sena Jharkhand Students Protest mein kyun interest nahi le rhi? 🔒 Anonymous poll Votes: 10 Wahan kya faayda hai? — 1 (10%) CJP ne student protest kiya tha? — 4 (40%) Students ki chinta to kisi ko bhi nahi hai Bhai Bharat desh mein — 5 (50%)

👍3

Signed PublicComments1

26 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📊 Law 📝 Jin andolankariyon ne kanoon toda, police aur surakshabal per haath uthaya, sarvajanik sampati ka nuksaan kiya, desh virodhi naare lagaye, pradhan mantri ke liye apshabd bole, gande aur ghinone poster dikhaye, unko sarkar dwara, sirf is kutark per ki in sabka ka bhavishya kharab ho jayega is kaaran/aadhar per, maaf kiya jana chahiye? 🔒 Anonymous poll Votes: 23 Haan, maaf karna chahiye — 7 (30%) Na, maaf n…

👌5

Signed PublicComments1

26 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👏1

Signed PublicComments1

21 Jul 2026, 03:02 UTC360 viewsread 7 August 2026

📊 BJP #1 📝 आपके विचार में क्या सीजेपी आंदोलन को BJP भाजपा सरकार ने सही तरीके से संभाला है? Does the central government handle this protest aptly? Votes: 23 हां, सख्ती जरूरी है Yes, action is ok — 4 (17%) न, सरकार को बात सुननी चाहिए No, government should listen — 13 (57%) देश के विरुद्ध किसी भी बात को समर्थन नहीं है I don't support anything anti-india — 6 (26%)

Signed PublicComments1

21 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026

📊 Delhi 20/07/26 📝 सीजेपी वाले नागरिकों को खूब चुतिया बना रहे हैं? CJP provoking common people? Votes: 21 हां Yes — 15 (71%) न No — 5 (24%)

Signed PublicComments1

21 Jul 2026, 02:44 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClubOfExclusiveMedia1Video

जंतर मंतर पर बेचारे कॉकरोच लठ्ठ खा रहे थे और मेट्रो स्टेशन पर ये विजेता दहिया बर्गर खाते हुए पकड़ा अब कॉकरोचों को भी शर्म आएगी ऐसे लीडर को सपोर्ट करने की Vijeta Dahiya, CJP aur unke supporters ki MKB #VDKMKB #CJPkMKB #CJPSupportersKMKB

Signed PublicComments1

18 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📊 Poll 4 📝 CJP ki MKB? Votes: 29 Haan — 20 (69%) Na — 9 (31%)

👌2

Signed PublicComments1

16 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📊 Poll 3 📝 #@CnGPollRoBot released by CnG PNT. Use this bot and review by voting below. Votes: 4 Working Ok — 2 (50%) Not working — 2 (50%)

👍4

Signed PublicComments1

16 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC178 viewsread 7 August 2026

📊 Sonam Wangchuk 📝 Sonam Wangchuk's action and support to CJP etc makes him reliable? Votes: 14 Yes ✅ 5 ❌ 0 🤷 0 No ✅ 1 ❌ 7 🤷 0 Maybe ✅ 1 ❌ 0 🤷 0 Click on an option to vote ✅/❌/🤷

Signed PublicComments1

23 Jun 2026, 01:31 UTC≈1,600 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Kyaa aap apne messages edit kar pa rhe ho?

  1. Haan32%
  2. Na68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4

Signed PublicComments1

23 Jun 2026, 01:29 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kya kisi aur indian telegram user ko bhi "message edit karne mein problem aa rhi hai??? Vote karo

Signed PublicComments1

15 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC203 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CnG_Promotions_Network_Paid

Hey everyone! We built a AI chatbot on Telegram with image generator. Features: ✨ Chat with Llama 3.3 (latest AI model) 🎨 Generate AI images 🎁 20 free credits to start 🔄 Daily bonus + referral rewards No signup needed, just open Telegram: t.me/PMAiRo_bot Would love feedback! DM us @Donate2UsBot

👍2

Signed PublicComments1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @publicpolls0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2026, 01:31 UTCFinal Results87 voters

Kyaa aap apne messages edit kar pa rhe ho?

  1. Haan32%
  2. Na68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jun 2026, 03:27 UTCAnonymous Poll122 voters

कल दिल्ली में तिलचट्टा पार्टी की असलियत का खुलासा हो गया?

  1. हां58%
  2. न11%
  3. समझ नहीं आया30%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jun 2026, 01:36 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

क्या आपको अपने पुरुष होने पर गर्व है? महिलाओं को भी वोट देना है, ताकि वे अपने पिता, भाई, पति इत्यादि पर अपने विचार व्यक्त कर सकें। कमेंट करने के लिए pinned message देखें।

  1. हां, मैं अपने परिजनों के लिए बहुत मायने रखता हूं83%
  2. हां, मैं अपने परिजनों के लिए बहुत मायने नहीं रखता हूं8%
  3. न, मैं अपने परिजनों के लिए कुछ भी नहीं कर रहा हूं25%
  4. न, समाज के अधिकतर जुर्मों में पुरुष ही जिम्मेदार हैं0%
  5. समझ नहीं आता गर्वित हूं या नहीं।8%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 May 2026, 14:24 UTCAnonymous Poll133 voters

कॉकरोच जनता पार्टी पर आपके विचार क्या हैं? What is your opinion about the Cockroach Janta Party?

  1. "आप" की दूसरी पार्टी, "AAP"'s B Party33%
  2. असली जनता की हितैषी है, Really concernd about people25%
  3. बीजेपी की दूसरी पार्टी, BJP's B Party3%
  4. जनता को झूठा भड़का कर मूर्ख बना रहे, Agitating public by lies46%
  5. कुछ और, NOTA11%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 May 2026, 02:05 UTCFinal Results257 voters

Proven Rape punishment?

  1. Death54%
  2. Genital Mutilation31%
  3. Death for Rapists with family who tried to save Them34%
  4. No punishment. I will give my daughter, sister, wife and mother to Rapists to play again.5%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 May 2026, 03:04 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने कहा है कि तेल, गैस, सोना इत्यादि का कारोबार कम करो। क्या लगता है आपको?

  1. सही कहा है71%
  2. गलत कहा है29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PublicPolls” (@publicpolls0), 260 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/publicpolls0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.