星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區) pinned a photo

Channel
星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區)
@ptgfstar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
421subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001880673797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ptgfstar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ptgfstar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 421 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 422 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 423 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 421 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 421 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
星探事務所05: Joey.T好評 Age:25歲 Height:165cm Weight:114lbs 👙32B 23 34👙 Miss Lam囡囡分析: 對於平時好鍾情對頭髮有Highlight 既哥哥仔 可以約一約 迷人既骨感 港女既氣質 加上Highlight 左既mk金 只可以講香港女仔係多 但唔係個個Highlight 😏 Cs Miss Lam💯 @Misslamhk http://wa.me/+85262734297 聯絡🤟🏻 #星探事務所JOEY.T好評
星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區) pinned a photo
星探事務所23:地產Agent 嘉怡好評 Age:25歲 Height:168cm Weight:108lbs 👙32B 24 32👙 Miss Lam囡囡分析: 細心留意每位客人所需,懂得客人床上的需求點😏重可以追加Full set OL Suit, 又可以角色扮演做你秘書,真正體驗做老闆比人服侍既感覺🫵🏻 Cs Miss Lam💯 @Misslamhk http://wa.me/+85262734297 聯絡✌🏻 #星探事務所地產經紀嘉怡好評
❤1
星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區) pinned a photo
星探事務所07: ABC&超級GFABLE凱晴好評 Age:24歲 Height:162cm Weight:109lbs 👙32B 23 31👙 Miss Lam囡囡分析: 經常都以ABC Outfit會見我地尊貴既男客人😊較為其次Outfit係以半Vintage,甜美性感風。凱晴係一位好善解人意既女士,希望各位男士好好錫住佢🥰 Cs Miss Lam💯 @Starupmisslam http://wa.me/+85262734297 聯絡✌🏻 #星探事務所Gfable凱睛好評
星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區) pinned a photo
星探事務所21: 素人大學生Year4-曈曈 好評 Age:23歲 Height:163cm Weight:110lbs 👙34C 24 33👙 Miss Lam囡囡分析: 現今素人大學生應該各位先生都知道玩得開又放啦🤭曈曈以我觀察喜歡穿著緊身衣物,夏天更加喜歡著三點式Bikini🔞各位先生有興趣可以追加喔🩷 Cs Miss Lam💯 @ptgfhkmiss http://wa.me/+85262734297 聯絡✌🏻 #星探事務所素人大學生曈曈好評
❤2
星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區) pinned a photo
星探事務所20: 輕熟女人妻系-Denise好評 Age:29歲 Height:163cm Weight:113lbs 👙34D 25 32👙 Miss Lam囡囡分析: 大波人妻Denise充滿著陀地港女既母愛🥹既溫柔又體貼,只係唔經常向外展現出黎😇對手唔多只有ex同現任老公但擁有豐富性經驗😜敬請預約,一般只有平日下午有時間偷跳偷跳🔞 Cs Miss Lam💯 @ptgfhkmiss http://wa.me/+85262734297 聯絡✌🏻 #星探事務所輕熟女人妻Denise好評
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ptgfstar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 449,699 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ptgfstar named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“星 探 事 務 所💞(VIP好評區)” (@ptgfstar), 421 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptgfstar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.