Channel
@psyzaum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
568subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054118946 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyzaum |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyzaum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 568 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 565 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 565 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,158 |
| Reactions total | 243 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
243 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 64.2% | |
| custom 5300779290181262152 | 35 | 14.4% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5300935755839854273 | 13 | 5.35% | |
| custom 5220069080798611448 | 5 | 2.06% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| custom 5307504504592159894 | 1 | 0.412% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.412% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psyzaum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Никто так сильно не сопротивляется своей успешной судьбе, как невротичный мужчина. Вот для кого неудовлетворение другого превыше собственных удовольствий. #психоанализ #психоаналитикМосква #неврознавязчивости
❤6💯5
И о том, как страдание пресечь: Из книги Андрея Терентьева «Беседы о пустоте»
❤2
Будда о том, откуда берется страдание: Из книги Андрея Терентьева «Беседы о пустоте»
❤4
Любовь не спасает от внутренних демонов, но она придает смелости, позволяет увидеть их, признать, что они - часть души и попытаться с ними ужиться. Благодаря инаковости другого, как любящего, так и любимого. #психоаналитикМосква #психоанализ
❤8
Истеричка тогда учиняет подрыв Господского авторитета, когда сталкивается с нехваткой в себе самой. И, конечно, речи быть не может о том, чтоб взращивать упорным трудом достоинство в себе, проще лишить его другого. Проблема только в том, что тот, кто на самом деле достоинством обладает, его просто так не лишается, а вот с истеричкой обходится по заслугам. А тот, кто его [достоинство] так легко отдает истеричке, ус…
custom 530077929018126215214custom 53009357558398542733
Я и есть собственно продукт, получаемый в результате внедрения субъекта нехватки в цепочку означающих. Я и продукт, Я и объект, Я и сам себе определенный другой, который под именем представлен Другому - здравствуйте 🤝 #Лакан17чтениеscriptum #психоаналитикМосква #психоанализ
💯4
«Мы хватаем через край вовсе не потому, что хватает через край, по отношению к нам кто-то другой. Беда происходит, когда мы одновременно переходим границу» Жак Лакан, семинар XVII Можно ли лучше описать ситуацию, в который происходит нарастающий накал страстей и разрядка в виде разыгрывания?! Когда юноша в своем молчании получает нескончаемый поток слов от возлюбленной, оба неспособны остановиться, пока не дойдут …
❤5
Большая роскошь жить по сердцу и делать что-то по любви. К сожалению, мы часто останавливаемся на долге, страхе и насилии, от того и страдаем, будто в жизни ничего кроме этого и нет. #психоаналитикМосква #психоанализ
❤16💯5
«Он [мужчина] переносит на нее [женщину] все, чего желает и чего боится, все, что любит и что ненавидит. О ней потому так трудно говорить, что мужчина ищет в ней себя целиком; она - Все. Только это Все лежит в плоскости несущностного; она - все Другое. А будучи другим, она другая и по отношению к себе самой, и к тому, чего от нее ждут. Она - все, а потому никогда не бывает в точности тем, чем должна была бы быть; она…
❤17
Сегодня снился сон, в котором я уговариваю себя, что мне нравится водяной. Прям такой склизкий, непривлекательный, навязчиво бредущий за мной, а я говорила себе: «- посмотри, ты же ему нравишься, стОит и в нем разглядеть что-то привлекательное; - но я же не могу жить с водяным, только потому что он проявил ко мне симпатию» - парировала я сама себе. И сразу после этих раздумий лужа, в которой мы с ним находились, ст…
❤12
Женщины, записавшие себя в «главные бывшие» мужчины, и думающие, что после отношений он ищет в других именно вас, напомню, что и в вас он никого, кроме своей матери, не видел. Даже, если вы совсем на нее не похожи. Так что успокаиваемся и занимаемся собой прекрасной, а не преследованием бывшего. #психоанализ #психоаналитикМосква
❤12custom 53007792901812621525custom 53009357558398542734custom 52200690807986114483
«Женщина есть позитивное воплощение той нехватки, какую существующий носит в сердце, и мужчина надеется реализоваться, стремясь через нее обрести самого себя». Симона де Бовуар «Второй пол. Том 1. Факты и мифы»
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psyzaum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 281,614 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психоаналитическая заумь” (@psyzaum), 568 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyzaum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.