Channel

روان پنهان, هوشیاری پس از آگاهی

@psyramin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

740subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001503729932
Type	Channel
Username	@psyramin
Created	Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	7 August 2026
Measurements held	2
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/psyramin

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted first	Then	Overlap	Gap
@psyramin/545 · this entry21 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC	@RaminDMT/342721 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@psyramin/547 · this entry17 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC	@RaminDMT/342917 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@psyramin/545 · this entry21 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC	@PaChidiM/44021 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@psyramin/547 · this entry17 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC	@PaChidiM/44217 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC	1.00	under a minute

Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
Channel	Matching posts	Text overlap	Typical gap	Published first
@RaminDMT	13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)	1.00	under a minute	this entry (9–4)
@PaChidiM	13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)	1.00	under a minute	this entry (10–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 September 2025 to 23 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @psyramin — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

DMT In The Mind
@RaminDMT · Channel684 subscribers Pachidim
@PaChidiM · Channel444 subscribers

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 739–741 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
7 Aug 2026, 11:24	740	no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31	740	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Nov 2025, 15:47 UTC346 viewsread 6 August 2026

Voice message

چرا با مصرف روانگردان‌ها احساس یکی شدن با جهان میکنیم؟ @PsyRamin

23 Nov 2025, 07:58 UTCviews —

روان پنهان, هوشیاری پس از آگاهی pinned «مقالات آموزشی هیپنوتیزم و روانشناسی: 1, کنترل احساسات و رفتار خود و دیگران حتی در حین مکالمه‌های روزانه با تکنیک‌های هیپنوتیزمی. 2, فقط با خواندن متن خودتان را هیپنوتیزم کنید و باورهای مخرب را از ناخودآگاه حذف کنید و چگونه برای هر موضوعی متن هیپنوتیزمی…»

22 Nov 2025, 11:32 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 6 August 2026

مقالات آموزشی هیپنوتیزم و روانشناسی: 1, کنترل احساسات و رفتار خود و دیگران حتی در حین مکالمه‌های روزانه با تکنیک‌های هیپنوتیزمی. 2, فقط با خواندن متن خودتان را هیپنوتیزم کنید و باورهای مخرب را از ناخودآگاه حذف کنید و چگونه برای هر موضوعی متن هیپنوتیزمی بنویسیم 3, ایجاد خارش شدید بدن در افراد مختلف با تکنیک های هیپنوتیزمی 4, چگونه در یک گفتگوی روزمره، افراد را هیپنوتیزم کنید؟ 5, رازهای پنهان و ممنوعه روانشناسی که…

15 Nov 2025, 16:52 UTC275 viewsread 6 August 2026

تا حالا شده یه نفر جوری باهات حرف بزنه که انگار انتخاب‌هات «بچگانه» یا «غیرمنطقی» هستن… بدون اینکه مستقیم بگه؟ همون لحظه بفهمی یه چیزی خرابه، اما نتونی دقیق دست بذاری روش؟ 🔍 این تکنیکو من اسمشو گذاشتم کوچیک‌سازی هوشمندانه. یعنی طرف مستقیم تحقیرت نمی‌کنه، اما با یه سری واکنش‌های ظریف، حس «بی‌عرضه بودن» یا «خام بودن» رو تو وجودت فعال می‌کنه. یه بار توی یه بحث کاری، یه نفر خیلی خونسرد گفت: «خب… اینم یه جور نگاهه.» همون…

12 Nov 2025, 08:57 UTC263 viewsread 6 August 2026

تکنیک «کلافگیِ کنترل‌شده» (Controlled Overwhelm) یه چیز خفن و خاص که کمتر کسی ازش خبر داره. 🧲 تاحالا یکی رو دیدی که یهویی انقدر حرف می‌زنه یا اطلاعات می‌ده که مغزت قفل می‌کنه و آخرش همون کاری رو می‌کنی که خودش می‌خواست؟ 😐🔥 🔍 «کلافگی کنترل‌شده» یه تکنیکیه که طرف مقابل تو رو توی چند دقیقه با حجم اطلاعات، سوال، احساس، یا جزئیات ریز غرق می‌کنه… تا مغزت نتونه تحلیل کنه و مجبور بشی تسلیم پیشنهادش بشی. یه بار یکی از دوست…

1 Nov 2025, 20:47 UTC663 viewsread 6 August 2026

تا حالا یکی بهت گفته: «فلانی ببین چقدر بهتر از توئه!» و حس کردی خورد شدی؟ 😤 🔍 اینجا با یه ترفند روبه‌رویی به اسم مقایسه‌ی ناعادلانه. یعنی طرف عمداً تو رو با کسی مقایسه می‌کنه که شرایطش زمین تا آسمون با تو فرق داره… فقط برای اینکه احساس کنی کافی نیستی. مثلاً میگه: «ببین همکارت چقدر مسئول‌تره!» یا «اون دوست‌پسر قبلی من همیشه فلان کارو می‌کرد…» هدفی جز تخریب اعتمادبه‌نفست نداره. 🚫 راه دفاع: یادت باشه هر آدمی مسیر خاص…

24 Oct 2025, 19:36 UTC681 viewsread 6 August 2026

تا حالا حس کردی یکی داره از مهربونیت، سکوتت یا ترس‌هات به نفع خودش استفاده می‌کنه؟ 😒 🔍بهره‌برداری یعنی یکی ضعف یا احساساتت رو می‌شناسه و ازش مثل ابزار استفاده می‌کنه. مثلاً وقتی یه نفر می‌دونه “نه” گفتن برات سخته، همیشه ازت کمک می‌خواد و اگه ردش کنی ناراحت میشه. یا کسی که از ترس تنهاییت سوءاستفاده می‌کنه تا هر کاری بخواد انجام بدی. 🚫 راه دفاع: مرز بکش! هر کسی که “می‌خواد” ازت کمک بگیره، “حقش” نیست که همیشه بگیره. …

22 Oct 2025, 18:43 UTC201 viewsread 6 August 2026

File

این منبع، راهنمای جامعی برای درک و پرورش عشق و روابط انسانی ارائه می‌دهد و تأکید می‌کند که عشق یک نیاز اساسی انسان برای بقا و رفاه است. این پادکست، موضوع را از دریچه‌های روان‌شناختی، زیست‌شناختی و عملی بررسی می‌کند و پیوند حیاتی بین کیفیت رابطه و سلامت جسمی را مورد بحث قرار می‌دهد و به تحقیقات در مورد کاهش استرس و طول عمر اشاره می‌کند. چارچوب‌های روان‌شناختی کلیدی مورد بررسی شامل سلسله مراتب نیازهای مازلو و نظریه مثل…

17 Oct 2025, 05:52 UTC239 viewsread 6 August 2026

تا حالا شده یکی کاری کنه که احساس کنی «بدهکاری احساسی» داری؟ اون‌قدر ظریف و حساب‌شده که حتی خودت هم نفهمی چطور وارد بازی شدی؟ یه چیزی هست به اسم بدهی عاطفی ساختگی — یعنی طرف یه لطفی، محبت یا فداکاری نشون میده، اما تهش ازت انتظار داره که جبرانش کنی… نه با محبت، بلکه با اطاعت. من خودم یه بار توی یه همکاری تجربه‌اش کردم. یه نفر وسط یه بحران بزرگ کاری، کلی کمکم کرد. اون موقع واقعاً ممنونش بودم، ولی بعدش دیدم هر بار یه ک…

10 Oct 2025, 19:58 UTC640 viewsread 6 August 2026

تکنیک سایه‌ی موازی (Shadow Mirroring) تاحالا شده حس کنی یکی خیلی شبیه توئه… انگار آینه‌ته؟ ولی بعداً فهمیدی اصلاً اون آدمی که فکر می‌کردی نیست؟ 😶 تکنیک «سایه‌ی موازی» یعنی طرف مقابلت ناخودآگاه احساس کنه تو دقیقاً مثل خودشی! از حرف زدن گرفته تا حرکات، لحن، ارزش‌ها و حتی رؤیاهاش. یه بار یه آقایی رو دیدم که توی سه دقیقه کاری کرد دختری که تازه دیده بود، باهاش احساس نزدیکی کنه. چطور؟ هر چیزی که دختر گفت، یه نسخه‌ی ظریف …

21 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC278 viewsread 6 August 2026

هیچ‌وقت حس کردی یکی اونقدر "دلسوز" باشه که انگار داری تو قفسِ مهربونیش خفه می‌شی؟ من اسمشو میذارم مهربونی سمی. ظاهرش قشنگه: نگرانی، دلسوزی، مراقبت… ولی زیر پوستش کنترل خوابیده. یادمه یکی از نزدیکام همیشه می‌گفت: «من فقط می‌خوام بهترین چیزا برات اتفاق بیفته.» اوایل دلم گرم می‌شد، اما بعد متوجه شدم هر تصمیمی می‌خواستم بگیرم، فوری می‌گفت «این کارت به ضررته، نکن.» کم‌کم دیگه حتی جرئت نمی‌کردم چیزی که دلم می‌خواستو امتح…

21 Sept 2025, 12:07 UTC562 viewsread 6 August 2026

✨ دوختن حقیقت با قصه‌ها تا حالا حس کرده‌ای که یه نفر با چند تا قصه کوچیک داره هویتت رو آروم آروم عوض می‌کنه، بدون اینکه خودت حتی متوجه بشی؟ یه تکنیک خیلی زیرپوستی هست که من اسمش رو گذاشتم «دوختن حقیقت با خرده‌داستان‌ها» — یعنی طرف مقابل به جای آوردن یک استدلال بزرگ، هزار تا قصه کوچیک، اشاره‌، تعریف و «یادت هست وقتی…» می‌پاشه جلوِت. یادمه یکی از آشناها این کار رو رو باهام کرد: اول یه تعریف ساده از یه اشتباه قدیمی م…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psyramin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 254,792 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Pachidim
@PaChidiM · 4449 posts DMT In The Mind
@RaminDMT · 6849 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Pachidim
@PaChidiM · 44415 posts DMT In The Mind
@RaminDMT · 68415 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روان پنهان, هوشیاری پس از آگاهی” (@psyramin), 740 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyramin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.